The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,415 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en ROI — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Zonal se distingue en ease of use and customer support .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,415 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1,414 | 1 |
Apres analyse de 1,415 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, tandis que ceux de Zonal mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 675 avis | #42 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 235 avis | #48 0 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 51 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #4 5 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avis | #36 1 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 245 avis | #38 1 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 145 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 96 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 532 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 166 avis | #29 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 201 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #3 13 avis | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Zonal PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel management, but Cloudbeds’ comprehensive features and extensive global presence give it a significant edge, especially given its larger review base and recent user feedback.
Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one platform with robust integrations, automations, and a user-friendly interface, while Zonal’s cloud PMS emphasizes real-time OTA connectivity and operational simplicity. The key question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s current operations and future plans?
Cloudbeds and Zonal both serve as core management tools, but they approach hotel operations differently. Cloudbeds integrates reservation management, revenue tools, channel management, guest experience, and reporting into a single platform, aiming to reduce manual work and improve efficiency across diverse property types.
Zonal, on the other hand, focuses heavily on real-time OTA connectivity, front desk operations, and operational streamlining, primarily targeting independent hotels and multi-property groups. While Cloudbeds emphasizes automation and guest-centric tools, Zonal’s strength lies in its real-time distribution and simple management interface.
Do you need an all-in-one growth engine, or is a streamlined, OTA-focused system enough for your hotel?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that centralizes operations—especially if you operate multiple properties or want to automate revenue management—go with Cloudbeds. Its 1,219 reviews and recent 76 reviews in the last six months reinforce its credibility and ongoing user satisfaction.
If your hotel prioritizes real-time OTA distribution, easy front desk management, and minimal operational complexity—particularly if you’re a smaller independent property—Zonal might seem appealing. However, with only 1 review and limited recent feedback, Zonal’s community and product development appear more limited.
For growth-driven hotels, Cloudbeds’ broader feature set and global presence make it the stronger choice. Smaller hotels seeking straightforward OTA management may find Zonal sufficient, but the limited recent reviews reduce confidence in its current support and innovation.
Cloudbeds currently holds a high ease-of-use rating of 4.58/5, with positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive, user-friendly interface. New users report quick onboarding (average 4.41/5) and minimal training hurdles, with many praising its straightforward navigation.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, reflecting its simple, clean interface tailored for operational efficiency. Support and onboarding are also highly rated, with users appreciating the UK-based support team that facilitates quick setup.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds vastly outpaces Zonal in features, boasting over 90 unique functionalities—including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, automation tools, and integrated payment processing. These enable a holistic management environment adaptable to various hotel sizes.
Zonal offers essential features like real-time OTA channel management, a responsive booking engine, mobile check-in/out, digital room keys, and basic operational modules. While effective for streamlining day-to-day tasks, it lacks the extensive automation, detailed analytics, and revenue tools Cloudbeds provides.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ feature set is far more comprehensive, supporting scaling and advanced revenue strategies. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds holds a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews citing fast response times and attentive service, although some users report occasional delays during peak periods. Their support team is generally seen as responsive and friendly.
Zonal scores a perfect 5/5, with users praising their dedicated UK-based support, quick issue resolution, and smooth onboarding process. While Zonal’s support appears highly rated, the limited number of recent reviews restricts full comparison.
Edge: Zonal.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including popular OTAs, payment gateways, revenue management, and POS systems. This extensive network allows for a unified operation environment, reducing manual data entry and errors.
Zonal’s PMS offers just 2 verified integrations, primarily with its own F&B systems and a handful of external partners like OTAs. Its limited integration ecosystem restricts flexibility, especially for hotels seeking a fully connected tech stack.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ extensive integrations position it as the more adaptable, future-proof choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating of 4.62/5 is based on 1,219 reviews, with recent positive feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and Hostel properties, rate it highly, with an NPS of 8.94/10.
Zonal’s current rating is 0/5, with only 1 review, and no recent feedback available. This lack of community input makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction confidently.
Conclusion: Cloudbeds’ well-established reputation and recent reviews make it the favored system. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a fixed monthly fee of $500, with no additional implementation or trial costs. The pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and global support infrastructure.
Zonal’s base price is $600 per month, with similar no-trial policies. While slightly higher, Zonal’s pricing may be justified by its focused features for specific markets, but the lack of transparent additional costs limits precise comparison.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and Zonal serve different hotel management needs. Cloudbeds provides a full-featured, integrated platform with a strong customer base, ongoing innovation, and a global reach, making it ideal for growth-oriented and multi-property hotels.
Zonal delivers a straightforward, reliable solution with excellent support, best suited for independent hotels or properties that prioritize OTA connectivity and operational simplicity.
If your hotel aims to scale, optimize revenue, and benefit from automation, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If operational simplicity and local support are your priorities, Zonal could suffice, but limited recent community feedback is a concern.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’ larger review base, recent user satisfaction, and extensive feature set make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to grow and modernize.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS et Zonal PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 78 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds HMS et Zonal PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds HMS propose 189 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Zonal PMS en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Zonal PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds HMS : Non. Zonal PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et Zonal a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits