The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,265 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.6/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Payment processing.
PREVIO se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,265 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,265 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 1,265 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout ease of use and fast staff adoption, reporting and analytics, reservations and calendar workflow, tandis que ceux de PREVIO mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of use and fast staff adoption
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and calendar workflow
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel management and OTA synchronization
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Assistance clientèle et assistance humaine en direct
▾
|
|
|
−
Payments, billing, and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Housekeeping, room status, and operational workflow
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #1 592 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #4 212 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #5 42 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #13 4 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #4 228 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #6 116 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 93 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 435 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 226 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #7 11 avis | — |
When comparing Cloudbeds PMS and Previo, your team faces a choice between a highly-rated, globally recognized platform and a less-reviewed but regionally focused solution. Both tackle hotel management challenges by centralizing operations, but Cloudbeds offers a broader feature set, stronger user feedback, and more recent reviews. How do these differences impact your decision?
Cloudbeds aims to be an all-in-one hospitality engine, streamlining reservations, distribution, and revenue management. Previo, in contrast, provides a comprehensive cloud system tailored mainly for Central and Eastern Europe, emphasizing automation and simplicity. The question remains: which suits your property’s needs best?
Cloudbeds and Previo both serve hotel operators seeking operational control, but they diverge in scale, regional focus, and review credibility. Cloudbeds’s extensive review base—over 1,000 recent reviews with a 4.63/5 overall rating—makes it a more reliable indicator of current performance. Previo’s absence of recent reviews suggests less confidence in its current capabilities and market presence.
Cloudbeds’s high ratings across ease of use, support, and value for money demonstrate broad user satisfaction. In comparison, Previo has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings, making it hard to gauge its effectiveness or customer sentiment. Given Cloudbeds’s proven track record, does the lesser-known Previo meet your confidence threshold?
If your hotel operates internationally or seeks a flexible, feature-rich platform with proven customer support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its platform suits properties ranging from boutique hotels to hostels, with a focus on scalability, integrations, and automation.
Conversely, if your hotel is based in Central or Eastern Europe, prioritizes regional-specific tools like automated payments and local integrations, and prefers a simplified interface with fewer features, Previo might fit. But without recent reviews or a widespread user base, Cloudbeds’s more extensive experience and positive reputation make it the safer bet for most properties.
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.61/5 for ease of use, supported by a robust onboarding process rated 4.45/5 and positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface. Users praise its straightforward reservation workflows, mobile access, and centralized management, making daily operations smoother.
There are some reports of slow system performance during peak hours, but overall, users find Cloudbeds’s interface accessible and manageable. Previo offers a simpler, regionally tailored solution, but with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess its usability. Based on available data, Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides 33 features unique to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, automated night audits, guest CRM, and mobile apps. Its extensive integrations—190 verified partners—enable seamless connectivity with third-party systems, enhancing operational flexibility.
Previo offers a unified suite with PMS, booking engine, channel management, guest app, and payment automation but with no reported exclusive features beyond its core offerings. Given the feature count and integration depth, Cloudbeds’s feature set clearly surpasses Previo. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support is highly rated at 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, knowledgeable assistance and prompt support team responses. Customers appreciate their onboarding process and ongoing technical help, which are frequently cited as key benefits.
Since Previo has no recent or detailed review data, assessing its support quality is impossible. With Cloudbeds’s proven support reputation and extensive customer success stories, Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and management tools. It supports real-time two-way integrations and channel self-mapping, reducing manual updates and errors.
Previo, by comparison, integrates with just 7 verified partners, mainly regional or niche systems. This limited connectivity restricts scalability and automation, especially for properties looking to expand or diversify distribution channels. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4.5/5, with many praising its ease of use, responsive support, and feature richness. Hotels across segments—boutique, hostel, and independent properties—report satisfaction, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.
Previo has no recent reviews or ratings, making it challenging to determine user satisfaction. The data clearly favors Cloudbeds, especially given its active, engaged user community. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free trial or freemium model. It charges a flat fee, with additional costs possibly for premium features or integrations, offering transparency for budgeting.
Previo does not publicly disclose its pricing structure, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. This opacity can hinder budget planning, making Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing a significant advantage.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Previo (regionally focused).
Cloudbeds offers a robust, well-supported property management system with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and a large, active user base. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm it is a market leader, suitable for hotels wanting reliability and growth potential.
Previo may appeal to hotels in specific regions, particularly CEE, seeking a straightforward, regionally tailored solution. However, the lack of recent user feedback and limited integrations make it less compelling for properties aiming for scalability or advanced features.
For most hoteliers, especially those with ambitions beyond regional markets or seeking proven support and features, Cloudbeds remains the top choice. Its extensive review base and recent positive feedback support this position, ensuring your team invests in a future-proof platform that grows with your property.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Comptabilité et Finance
|
|
|
| Facturation directe | ||
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
|
▾
Marketing et commerce électronique
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration et configuration
|
|
|
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Basé sur le cloud | ||
| Sur place | ||
|
▾
Gestion de la clientèle
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Réception
|
|
|
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Gestion des groupes
|
|
|
| Fonctionnalité de groupe | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Expérience client
|
|
|
| Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Entretien ménager
|
|
|
| Module d'entretien ménager | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Paiements
|
|
|
| Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Gestion des réservations
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
La gestion des recettes
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes et conformité
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Assistance & Formation
|
|
|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
|
▾
nourriture et boissons
|
|
|
| Épopée | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Module Spa & Bien-être |
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that th... Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that the clean layout and low training burden help hotels save time and keep daily operations moving smoothly.
Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users... Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users want more flexible filters, better customization, and easier export/visualization because the current reports can feel limited or too complex.
A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewer... A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewers say this streamlines front-desk work, speeds check-in/check-out, and helps prevent operational mistakes during busy periods.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Le service client est l'un des sujets les plus controversés dans les avis. De nombreux utilisateurs louent une assistance rapide, compétente et réacti... Le service client est l'un des sujets les plus controversés dans les avis. De nombreux utilisateurs louent une assistance rapide, compétente et réactive, tandis que d'autres critiquent la lenteur du traitement des tickets, les chatbots et le manque de disponibilité d'une ligne téléphonique fiable en cas d'urgence liée à l'hôtel.
Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are... Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are used. However, users also request more gateway options, better invoice support, and smoother handling of local payment methods and long-stay billing.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds PMS et Previo partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds PMS propose 200 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Previo en propose 8. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Cloudbeds PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds PMS : Non. Previo : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et PREVIO a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété