The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Clover se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Clover apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel often boils down to understanding the core capabilities, ease of use, and the support behind each product. Clover and Mews POS both aim to improve your operational workflows but target different hotel segments and feature sets. Your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic priorities will influence which system aligns best with your goals.
Clover offers a broad point-of-sale solution primarily designed for small to medium-sized retail and foodservice businesses, with limited hotel-specific features and a narrow regional presence. Mews POS, by contrast, is a purpose-built hotel restaurant POS with extensive integrations and a strong global presence, especially among boutique and branded hotels.
So, which one truly serves your hotel’s needs better? That’s the question we'll answer in this comparison.
Clover, owned by First Data, is a general-purpose POS primarily built for retail and small business owners. Its open-architecture platform supports myriad hardware options and simplifies payments, inventory, and basic sales reporting—ideal for independent hotels or small groups with straightforward needs.
Mews POS, developed specifically for the hospitality industry, combines POS, inventory, and guest data within a unified ecosystem. It offers deep integrations with property management and online ordering, streamlining operations across multiple hotel sizes and types.
Both systems aim to streamline transactions, but Clover’s focus is on flexible payments and hardware options, while Mews emphasizes hospitality-specific functions and integrations. Which one aligns better with your operational complexity and growth plans?
If your hotel needs a scalable, hotel-focused POS with deep integrations and automation features, Mews POS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (29 unique features) supports complex restaurant operations, real-time reporting, and guest data management, making it suitable for boutique, branded, and multi-property hotels.
If your hotel primarily requires a simple, standalone payment terminal with minimal integration needs—especially if you already use a broader POS or restaurant system—Clover might suffice. However, given Clover’s limited hotel-specific feature set and regional presence, it’s less suitable for hotels aiming to modernize or expand.
Considering the review data, Mews’ 156 recent reviews and a 9.32/5 NPS score demonstrate strong user satisfaction. Clover, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers little evidence of ongoing support or effectiveness.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS earns a high user rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hoteliers praise its cross-device accessibility, which simplifies staff training and daily operations across desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
Clover’s usability isn’t well-documented in hotel-specific contexts, and its general-purpose POS can be complex for non-retail users. Its hardware options can also be overwhelming, especially without dedicated hotel workflows.
Given the recent and detailed reviews, Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts an impressive 29 unique features tailored to hotel restaurant operations: PCI compliance, discounts & promotions, upselling, digital menus, inventory & ingredient management, mobile ordering, integrated kitchen display, rewards programs, and extensive reporting tools. These are designed to streamline guest interactions and backend management.
Clover, with zero hotel-specific features, focuses on payment processing, hardware flexibility, and basic sales reporting. While suitable for retail, it lacks the comprehensive operational functions needed for hotel restaurants and F&B services.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews’ user reviews consistently rate support around 4.43/5, citing reliable, solution-oriented service and effective onboarding, especially praised for its well-designed onboarding process. Clients mention that support is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial during implementation and growth phases.
Clover's support ratings are not available, but the absence of recent reviews or detailed user feedback suggests limited or less active customer support for hotel-specific needs. Its focus on retail implies support may not be tailored for hospitality.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including popular names like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and over 1,000 via Mews Marketplace. These cover PMS, online ordering, payment gateways, and more, providing a highly connected operational ecosystem.
Clover’s single verified partner indicates limited integration options, which restricts hotel-specific automation and data flow. Its ecosystem is more suited to retail environments.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews’ reviews, with 66 recent entries, reflect high satisfaction, especially in boutique, branded, and city center hotels. Its 9.32/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend underscore its strong reputation among hotel operators.
Clover lacks recent review data or ratings specific to hotels, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction. Based on available evidence, Mews clearly has the edge.
Edge: Mews POS.
Clover’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not seem to have a standard hotel-focused pricing model. It generally operates with hardware costs and transaction fees, which may vary significantly by use case.
Mews charges a base fee of $200/month, with no implementation or setup fees, and offers a transparent pricing model suitable for hotels. Its value is reflected in the extensive features and integrations that support scalable operations.
Given the available info, Mews offers a more predictable and aligned pricing structure for hotels.
Edge: Mews POS.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Mews POS is a dedicated, hotel-centric solution with a proven track record, extensive features, and strong recent reviews. Its deep integrations, automation, and ease of use make it well-suited for hotels aiming to elevate guest experience and streamline operations.
Clover, by contrast, is a generic POS system better suited for retail or small-scale venues not requiring hotel-specific workflows. Its limited hotel focus and lack of recent reviews make it less reliable for hospitality use.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a comprehensive, integrated, and scalable POS platform that can grow with your business. Opt for Clover only if your operations are minimal, retail-focused, and regionally supported, with no plans for expansion into complex hotel services.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Clover et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Clover et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Clover propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Clover : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Clover a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits