The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 57 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Counter se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Hogatex se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 57 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 57 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 57 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Counter apprecient surtout interface utilisateur et convivialité, service client, fonctionnalités automatisées, tandis que ceux de Hogatex mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et convivialité
▾
|
|
|
+
Service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Fonctionnalités automatisées
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration de la plateforme
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Problèmes de bugs
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et gestion des revenus
▾
|
|
|
−
Tarification
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #26 28 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) | #46 4 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #32 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #31 1 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 avis | — |
| Luxe | #44 4 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #43 4 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #32 5 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #25 8 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 4 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #11 2 avis | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hogatex PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more extensive feature set make it the more complete solution. Hogatex, with no current reviews or ratings, offers a broader but less proven platform. Which system will truly elevate your hotel’s operations?
Counter’s comprehensive, user-rated platform offers a proven track record, whereas Hogatex remains untested in recent deployments. Are you prioritizing reliability and community feedback or exploring new options?
Counter excels in supporting hostel operations with an intuitive interface, automation features, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for budget accommodations and hostels. Hogatex claims to be a full-scale PMS but has no recent reviews or user feedback to verify its effectiveness.
Counter’s 54 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong user confidence, especially in ease of use and support. Hogatex’s absence of recent reviews suggests it’s either less adopted or less active in customer engagement, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 and customer support 4.96/5, praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hogatex’s lack of publicly available ratings means you have no recent data on user satisfaction, support quality, or ease of onboarding.
Counter features 19 distinct functionalities, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and automated night audits. Hogatex’s feature set remains undefined, with no publicly listed capabilities, making Counter’s offering the more transparent and proven choice.
Support-wise, Counter’s support team is highly rated, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hogatex’s support details and customer feedback are unavailable, indicating uncertainty in service quality.
Counter’s integrations include seven verified partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds—covering key channels and payment solutions. Hogatex has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for now.
Hoteliers rate Counter highly across segments, especially in hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hogatex’s lack of reviews prevents any assessment of user satisfaction, making Counter the safer bet for assured positive feedback.
Pricing details for Counter are unavailable, but its no-cost model for core features, plus optional paid integrations, suggests flexibility. Hogatex’s pricing remains undisclosed, which complicates direct cost comparisons.
Counter is ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, city-center properties, and independent inns—particularly those needing a straightforward, feature-rich system that supports mobile management. Not recommended if your property requires extensive automation or a broader property type beyond hostels.
Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger or needs a full PMS, but the absence of reviews makes this uncertain. It’s not ideal if you prioritize proven customer support, recent user feedback, or robust integrations.
Counter vs Hogatex: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter’s large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its reliability and effectiveness in hostel management and small hotel operations. Hogatex, with no recent reviews or community feedback, remains an untested option in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use PMS with built-in automation, integrations, and strong support, go with Counter. Its extensive features and positive user feedback make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Choose Hogatex if you are exploring new vendors and are willing to accept the risk of limited real-world validation. Its lack of recent reviews and unknown support quality make it a less certain investment.
In conclusion, Counter clearly stands out as the more dependable, reviewed, and feature-rich choice, especially for hostels and small hotels. Hogatex’s potential is unverified, and without recent customer insights, it’s harder to recommend confidently.
Counter by Counter offers a feature-rich, user-rated platform with recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels looking for proven operational tools. Hogatex PMS, with no recent feedback or ratings, remains an untested option that lacks demonstrated support and integrations.
Counter’s strong community feedback, multiple integrations, and ease of use make it the top choice. Hogatex’s lack of recent customer reviews and unknown capabilities place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking reliable, current solutions.
Counter’s intuitive interface simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and reporting, helping your team manage operations efficiently with minimal training. Its automation features—like automatic night audits and integrated POS—reduce manual work, freeing staff to focus on guest interactions.
Hogatex claims to streamline reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but provides no recent user feedback to confirm these efficiencies. Without current reviews, it’s unclear if Hogatex reduces workload or improves guest satisfaction like Counter does.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage the property from anywhere, offering flexibility that’s especially valuable for small or busy hotels. Hogatex’s platform lacks publicly available usability data, making it uncertain whether it can deliver similar operational gains.
Support at Counter is highly rated, with quick responses and proactive problem-solving. Hogatex provides no recent support reviews, so your team might face challenges in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Counter’s integrations with key partners like SiteMinder and Stripe facilitate daily operations by consolidating bookings and payments. Hogatex’s integrations are nonexistent in available data, limiting its immediate usefulness for integrated workflows.
Overall, if your staff values ease of use, automation, and reliable support, Counter will likely improve your daily operations. Hogatex’s untested platform leaves its impact on daily management uncertain.
Counter’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their quick, friendly assistance. Testimonials highlight staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts who resolve issues promptly, boosting team confidence.
Hogatex offers no recent review data on support quality. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether their support team is responsive or provides effective onboarding, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, and its user interface is praised for being clean and intuitive. Hogatex’s onboarding process and usability remain unverified due to lack of recent reviews.
Support features like 24/7 online assistance and dedicated account help set Counter apart. Without recent Hogatex customer feedback, its support quality remains unknown, posing a potential risk for new users.
In terms of staff adoption, Counter’s straightforward interface and positive onboarding ratings lead to faster staff training and higher user satisfaction. Hogatex’s unreviewed support and usability leave its ease of adoption in question.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features are well-documented, with many praised for their practicality and ease of use.
Hogatex’s feature set remains undisclosed, and no recent reviews or detailed descriptions are available. Without verified features, it’s impossible to compare comprehensively, but Counter’s transparent feature list makes it a safer, more predictable choice.
Counter’s integrated POS and revenue tracking modules support a broader range of operational needs. Hogatex, lacking public feature details, does not currently demonstrate the same level of functional depth.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s customer support is rated 4.96/5, with users consistently praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Positive reviews cite quick solutions to issues and proactive communication, especially during onboarding.
Hogatex offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality and responsiveness unverified. Without community feedback, your hotel risks uncertain assistance, which can be critical during system issues or training.
Counter’s support team is known for addressing bugs swiftly and providing ongoing assistance, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Hogatex’s lack of recent support reviews and data makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s service needs.
Support quality is crucial for smooth daily operations; with Counter’s proven record, your team will likely experience fewer disruptions. Hogatex’s support remains an unknown factor, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for streamlined bookings, payments, and access control, making daily operations smoother.
Hogatex currently has no verified integrations publicly listed. This limits its connectivity to essential third-party tools, potentially requiring manual processes that counteract efficiency.
Counter’s open partner ecosystem helps expand your hotel’s market reach and operational flexibility. Hogatex’s limited connectivity reduces its appeal for properties relying on multiple channels or payment providers.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s user base, primarily hostels and small hotels, rates it at 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Hogatex lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its absence from community feedback implies it’s less proven or less adopted in today’s hotel market.
Counter’s recent feedback confirms its strengths in usability, support, and feature set, especially for budget and hostel accommodations. Hogatex’s unverified reputation means it cannot be confidently recommended based on current user experiences.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but its free core features and optional paid services suggest a flexible, scalable approach for small to medium-sized properties.
Hogatex does not list any pricing information, leaving hoteliers to guess about costs or negotiate directly. The absence of transparent pricing may complicate budgeting decisions.
Counter’s lack of upfront costs and modular pricing make it suitable for properties seeking predictable investments. Hogatex’s undisclosed fees mean you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or lack of affordability.
Counter is best for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation without complex customization needs. It’s not suited for larger, enterprise-level hotels seeking highly tailored systems.
Hogatex might fit larger-scale operations, but the current lack of community feedback makes it a risky choice for hoteliers requiring proven support and functionality.
Counter’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for small hotels and hostels. Its broad feature set, integrations, and support infrastructure directly address the needs of properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Hogatex, without recent reviews or community feedback, remains an unverified contender. Its unknown support quality and features make it a risky option, especially when reliable service and proven results are critical.
If you need a trustworthy, well-supported platform with proven results, Counter is the clear winner. Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger, but it’s advisable to wait for more validation before choosing it.
Counter’s community-backed success and recent positive reviews give you confidence that it will meet your property’s operational needs. Its strong ecosystem of integrations and support makes it the safer, more strategic investment for your team.
Hogatex remains an unconfirmed candidate, with no recent user feedback to validate its claims. For now, Counter’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores make it the preferred option for hoteliers looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest experiences.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision toward a system that’s not only feature-rich but also trusted by your peers. Prioritize proven support, community reviews, and real-world functionality — Counter currently leads in all these areas.
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Counter et Hogatex PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier |
Affichage des principales differences. 7 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Les hôteliers apprécient l'interface de Counter, claire, intuitive et conviviale, facilitant ainsi la formation rapide des nouveaux employés. Les inte... Les hôteliers apprécient l'interface de Counter, claire, intuitive et conviviale, facilitant ainsi la formation rapide des nouveaux employés. Les interfaces mobiles et de bureau sont performantes, permettant aux responsables de gérer leurs tâches à distance. Counter se distingue notamment par sa simplicité de gestion du calendrier.
L'équipe d'assistance de Counter est régulièrement saluée pour sa réactivité et sa serviabilité. Des employés comme Evelyn et Max sont particulièremen... L'équipe d'assistance de Counter est régulièrement saluée pour sa réactivité et sa serviabilité. Des employés comme Evelyn et Max sont particulièrement reconnus pour leur professionnalisme. Cependant, des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la lenteur de l'assistance dans certains fuseaux horaires.
Les utilisateurs apprécient les fonctionnalités automatisées de Counter, notamment l'enregistrement sans contact, l'automatisation des paiements par c... Les utilisateurs apprécient les fonctionnalités automatisées de Counter, notamment l'enregistrement sans contact, l'automatisation des paiements par carte de crédit et la gestion des réservations sur plusieurs plateformes. Cette automatisation réduit la charge de travail du personnel et améliore l'efficacité opérationnelle.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Plusieurs hôteliers signalent des bugs persistants dans le système, notamment des problèmes de surréservation, d'affichage des disponibilités et d'err... Plusieurs hôteliers signalent des bugs persistants dans le système, notamment des problèmes de surréservation, d'affichage des disponibilités et d'erreurs système lors des annulations de réservation. Ces bugs ont un impact négatif sur les opérations quotidiennes et l'expérience client.
Les hôteliers apprécient les capacités de reporting de Counter, mais soulignent que ces rapports peuvent être améliorés pour une meilleure compréhensi... Les hôteliers apprécient les capacités de reporting de Counter, mais soulignent que ces rapports peuvent être améliorés pour une meilleure compréhension. Les fonctionnalités de gestion des revenus sont jugées insuffisantes, notamment pour les entreprises utilisant plusieurs formules tarifaires ou une tarification dynamique.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Counter et Hogatex PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Counter propose 7 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Hogatex PMS en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Counter est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Counter : Non. Hogatex PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Counter a un HT Score de 17 et Hogatex a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits