The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 42 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DJUBO se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Visitor se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 42 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 19 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #31 3 avis | #37 3 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) | #43 0 avis | #30 3 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #25 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #31 2 avis | #42 0 avis |
| Luxe | #31 2 avis | #33 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #39 0 avis | #28 2 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #31 0 avis | #22 2 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #33 0 avis | #31 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 23 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | #10 3 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing between DJUBO and Visitor hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently—DJUBO consolidates an extensive suite of features into one platform, while Visitor emphasizes simplicity with core functionalities. Your decision should factor in your hotel size, segment, and whether you need advanced integrations or straightforward operation. Are you ready to dive into the finer details to see which suits your team best?
DJUBO, with its 19 recent reviews and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5, stands out as the more proven and comprehensive option. Visitor, while also highly rated and praised in customer support, has fewer recent reviews (22 total, no reviews in the last six months) and lacks the same level of feature breadth. For most hoteliers looking for a robust, all-in-one platform, DJUBO offers a more reliable choice backed by more recent user feedback.
DJUBO and Visitor both target hotel management, tackling reservation, channel distribution, and guest engagement, but they diverge sharply in scope and complexity. DJUBO integrates a PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office tools, creating a unified environment for larger or multi-property hotels. Visitor focuses on essential functions like bookings, channel management, and guest communication, suitable for smaller or boutique properties.
The main difference is the level of feature depth: DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, such as group booking, automated night audits, and digital registration, designed for scalability. Visitor’s 7 unique features include website development, guest CRM, and online checkout, emphasizing ease of use and quick deployment. Do you need a full-stack management system or a straightforward, guest-centric tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management solution capable of handling multi-channel distribution, detailed revenue analysis, and operational automation, DJUBO is the clear winner. Its broad feature set and integrations support complex workflows for independent hotels and groups alike.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick setup, and core functionalities such as online bookings and guest management without extensive customization, Visitor fits better. It’s especially ideal for properties like bed & breakfasts, hostels, or budget hotels that value straightforward operations and strong customer service.
Hoteliers with a focus on growth, automation, and detailed reporting should lean toward DJUBO, while those seeking an easy-to-deploy, user-friendly platform for basic needs should opt for Visitor. Which profile aligns with your hotel’s current and future needs?
DJUBO scores a high 4.95/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and supportive onboarding process. Its comprehensive dashboard consolidates multiple functions, which might initially seem overwhelming but is designed for straightforward navigation once familiar.
Visitor slightly edges out with a 4.91/5 rating, praised for its simplicity, fast setup, and accessible online platform. Customers highlight how intuitive the booking and channel management features are, making onboarding smoother for small teams.
Edge: DJUBO, thanks to its highly rated user experience combined with extensive feature depth, particularly for larger hotels or groups requiring more complex management.
DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including group booking engine, automated night audits, guest communication via SMS, digital registration, and integrated CRS. It supports real-time status updates, task management, and ancillary revenue tracking—capabilities that cater to complex, multi-layered hotel operations.
Visitor comes with 7 unique features, such as website development, guest CRM, online checkout, and GDPR compliance, focusing on core operations. While its features cover essential booking and communication needs, it lacks the automation and advanced modules DJUBO provides.
For hotels requiring extensive automation, detailed revenue management, and operational control, DJUBO’s feature set is superior. If your needs are basic, Visitor’s streamlined features may suffice.
Edge: DJUBO, with 20 exclusive features that support scalable, multifaceted hotel management.
DJUBO’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews highlighting its supportive staff and quick issue resolution. Customers mention ongoing upgrades and a responsive onboarding experience, reinforcing confidence in their support system.
Visitor’s reviews, though limited, give it a perfect 5/5 score, with feedback emphasizing friendly, helpful customer service and quick problem-solving. However, the smaller review base means less data to assess consistency.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its larger review count and more recent feedback indicating strong support for hotel teams at all levels.
DJUBO connects with three verified partners, including Tripadvisor, Simplotel, and its own booking platform. These integrations can expand your reach and streamline data flow across channels and platforms.
Visitor currently has no verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools or expand its ecosystem. This may challenge hotels that rely on multiple platforms for operations.
Edge: DJUBO, with established partnerships that enhance connectivity and operational flexibility.
DJUBO’s review count (15 in the last six months) and near-perfect overall rating of 5/5 make it the more trusted choice for hoteliers. It is especially popular among independent hotels and multi-property groups, consistently rated highly across segments.
Visitor, with 22 reviews but no recent feedback, receives uniformly positive praise for customer service but lacks the same level of recent validation. Its niche appeal is more prominent among bed & breakfasts and small properties.
Edge: DJUBO, owing to more recent reviews and higher overall ratings among diverse hotel types.
Neither DJUBO nor Visitor provides explicit pricing details; both follow a custom pricing model without freemium options or monthly flat fees. Your hotel will need to contact each provider for tailored quotes.
This lack of transparent pricing emphasizes the importance of evaluating value and features during demos rather than initial costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only needs basic booking and guest management.
Not ideal if your hotel requires automation, advanced revenue management, or extensive reporting features.
DJUBO delivers a comprehensive management experience, suited for hotels aiming to scale or operate multiple properties with complex needs. Its broad feature set, integrations, and recent positive reviews make it a dependable choice for larger or growing hotels.
Visitor offers a simplified, user-friendly platform that works well for small hotels, B&Bs, and properties focused on guest experience over automation. Its high customer service ratings speak to its value for properties valuing simplicity and personal support.
If your hotel demands a full-suite management system with automation and detailed analytics, DJUBO is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is ease of use, quick setup, and core functionalities, Visitor is worth considering.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich solution supported by recent, extensive user reviews, DJUBO stands out as the more reliable, proven option.
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Djubo et Visitor App partagent 22 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Conforme au RGPD | ||
| Développement de sites Web | ||
| Entretien ménager | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Module d'achat de taux | ||
| Moteur de réservation de groupe | ||
| Paiement en ligne | ||
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Ruban graphique par glisser-déposer |
Affichage des principales differences. 15 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Djubo et Visitor App partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Djubo propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visitor App en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Djubo est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.9/5 contre 4.9/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Djubo : Non. Visitor App : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DJUBO a un HT Score de 0 et Visitor a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits