The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 251 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
EMS Software se distingue .
Tripleseat se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (5.0/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contact Management/CRM and PCI Compliant Payments.
Notes comparees basees sur 251 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 251 |
Apres analyse de 251 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de EMS Software apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Tripleseat mettent en avant onboarding and support, event management efficiency, user-friendly interface. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Event Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform Customization
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Proposal and Communication Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
Gestion documentaire
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion d'événements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 52 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 152 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 17 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 155 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #2 93 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 55 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #1 224 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 8 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #4 1 avis |
Choosing between EMS Software’s Event Management platform and Tripleseat for Hotels depends heavily on your hotel’s specific needs. EMS offers a broad, all-encompassing solution designed for complex, large-scale event planning, while Tripleseat emphasizes ease of use, sales, and catering management. Both platforms aim to streamline your event operations, but they target different hotel profiles with distinct strengths and weaknesses.
EMS’s comprehensive functionality caters to organizations that manage a high volume of intricate meetings and conference spaces, but it lacks recent reviews and user ratings. Tripleseat, by contrast, boasts over 219 reviews, highly recent feedback, and a stellar score of 96.7, making it the clearer choice for hotels seeking a proven platform. Do you need a feature-rich enterprise system or a user-friendly, well-supported solution?
EMS Software’s Event Management system has been around since 1986, claiming to help millions create effective meetings. However, its review score is 0/5 with no recent feedback or user ratings, indicating a lack of active user engagement or updates. Tripleseat, on the other hand, has a 4.78/5 rating based on 219 reviews, with 62 recent reviews in the last six months, showcasing ongoing customer satisfaction.
The core difference is that EMS emphasizes complex space scheduling and resource management, often used by educational institutions and large enterprises. Tripleseat excels at simplifying sales, client communication, and catering workflows, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties with high event volumes. Do you prioritize extensive functionality or ease of adoption and support?
If your hotel needs an intuitive platform focused on sales, client communication, and catering management, go with Tripleseat. Its strong review base, recent positive feedback, and 11 unique features—such as CRM, task management, and eSignatures—make it well-suited for properties seeking to boost revenue and streamline sales processes.
If your team requires detailed space planning, complex resource allocation, and large-scale event scheduling, EMS might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews and a stagnant rating of 0/5, its current user sentiment signals that it’s not the reliable option today. For most hotels, Tripleseat’s proven track record outweighs EMS’s extensive but unreviewed capabilities.
Tripleseat scores 4.53/5 in ease of use, based on user reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding experience. Multiple reviewers mention how easy it is for their teams to adopt and navigate, with support teams actively assisting during setup.
EMS, lacking recent reviews and user ratings, offers no current data on usability. Its outdated score of 0/5 and absence of recent feedback suggest that it might be difficult to learn and adopt. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat provides 11 features exclusive to its platform, including CRM, content management, client portals, task management, customizable BEOs, eSignatures, PCI payments, diagramming, and seating management. This breadth of features directly supports hotel sales, event planning, and operational efficiency.
EMS has no unique features listed and offers no shared functionalities with Tripleseat, indicating limited or outdated capabilities. Given Tripleseat’s richer feature set and active development, it holds a decisive edge here.
Tripleseat’s customer support scores 4.55/5, with reviews highlighting fast response times, helpful assistance, and ongoing support. Users describe the team as “quick to respond,” “educative,” and “responsive,” fostering smooth onboarding and issue resolution.
EMS’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, there’s no current evidence of support quality. Its lack of recent activity suggests that Tripleseat’s support is the more reliable choice. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat integrates with 15 verified partners, including property management systems, online booking tools, and payment processors like Stripe. It supports seamless data flow across platforms, which helps streamline operations and reduce manual work.
EMS, with no verified partners listed, appears isolated or outdated in its integration capabilities. For a hotel looking to connect with existing systems, Tripleseat’s extensive partner network offers a critical advantage. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat’s reviews are recent, with a high overall rating of 4.78/5 and a 91% likelihood to recommend among users in various segments, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. Hotels consistently praise its ease of use, support, and features, especially in the last six months.
EMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. The absence of feedback disqualifies it as a strong candidate, while Tripleseat’s active, positive reviews make it the clear leader. Edge: Tripleseat.
EMS does not publicly disclose its pricing, but it appears to lack a free trial or transparent fee structure. Tripleseat costs $400 monthly, with no free tier or setup fees, providing a predictable investment model.
For most hotels, transparent pricing and proven value matter more than theoretical capabilities. Tripleseat’s straightforward pricing combined with its active reviews supports better budget planning.
Hotels that manage multi-purpose conference centers, large educational institutions, or enterprise clients handling complex scheduling may consider EMS. The platform’s depth in space management and resource allocation aligns with large-scale event needs.
However, EMS is not ideal if your hotel is smaller or relies on quick, straightforward event sales and catering. Its outdated review status suggests it might not deliver the reliability needed for daily hotel operations.
Not ideal if:
Hotels that prioritize sales, catering, and event booking—especially boutique, conference, or city-center properties—should consider Tripleseat. Its ease of use, robust CRM, automation features, and recent positive reviews make it suitable for dynamic sales teams.
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Tripleseat is a proven, highly-rated platform currently supported by active user reviews, while EMS remains unreviewed for years and lacks recent feedback. For most hotels, Tripleseat offers a reliable, user-friendly, and feature-rich solution that drives better results.
Choose EMS only if your hotel manages highly complex, large-scale events and you have the resources to evaluate its older, less supported system. Otherwise, Tripleseat’s recent reviews, broad feature set, and positive customer feedback make it the better option.
If your hotel seeks a platform that enhances sales and simplifies event management, go with Tripleseat. Its active user base and extensive partner network give you confidence in its ongoing support and evolution.
For hotels requiring advanced space planning, resource management, or enterprise-grade scheduling, EMS may still appeal. But without recent reviews or active support, it’s a risky choice for today’s hotel environment.
In conclusion, Tripleseat’s proven track record, recent reviews, and feature set make it the clear, dependable choice for most hotels looking to optimize event operations today.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion d'événements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, EMS Event Management et Tripleseat partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| BEO personnalisable, documents de proposition et de contrat | ||
| Formulaires pour prospects | ||
| Gestion des contacts/CRM | ||
| Gestion des tâches (tâches et rappels) | ||
| Gestion du contenu et des fichiers | ||
| Portail de communication client |
Nous avons analyse 1 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing... Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing assistance throughout the setup process.
Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to... Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to time savings and better team alignment.
Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve use... Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve user experience for both clients and staff.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and... While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and billing to enhance overall workflow efficiency.
Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-ti... Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-time updates across platforms.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. EMS Event Management et Tripleseat partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Event Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. EMS Event Management propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Tripleseat en propose 15. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Tripleseat est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.5/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
EMS Event Management : Non. Tripleseat : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Event Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. EMS Software a un HT Score de 0 et Tripleseat a 97. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits