The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
E&S Kassensysteme se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de E&S Kassensysteme apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel hinges on several factors. Both E&S Kassensysteme Picasso and Mews POS aim to streamline sales, inventory, and operational management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market presence. With the overwhelming number of options, your decision should favor the product backed by recent, positive reviews and broader adoption.
Mews POS, with over 150 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend, currently stands out as the more trusted solution. Does your hotel prioritize a proven, well-supported platform, or are you open to a more niche, less-reviewed option?
E&S Kassensysteme Picasso is tailored as a retail and hospitality POS, focusing on transaction and inventory management. Its core strength lies in its straightforward, robust transaction handling, primarily suited for hotels that need a reliable, no-frills system with simple sales processing.
Mews POS, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with property management, offering extensive features like digital ordering, inventory management, and guest engagement tools. It’s designed for hotels seeking a unified platform that boosts operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
While E&S Kassensysteme provides a basic, functional POS, it lacks the modern, feature-rich environment that Mews offers. The question becomes: do you need a dependable transaction system or a comprehensive, all-in-one operational platform?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, physical POS designed mainly for retail transactions and inventory control, E&S Kassensysteme may meet your needs. It’s suitable for small hotels or those with minimal F&B requirements, focusing on basic sales.
However, for hotels looking to offer digital menus, online ordering, integrated guest profiles, and advanced reporting—especially with a desire for multi-device usability—Mews POS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set and high user ratings make it ideal for mid-sized to large properties or those planning to scale.
For hoteliers prioritizing quick deployment with minimal complexity, E&S Kassensysteme may suffice. But if your goal is to provide a modern guest experience and detailed operational insights, Mews is more aligned with your ambitions.
E&S Kassensysteme’s review profile indicates a lack of recent data, but its core design suggests a focus on basic functionality, which can be simple for trained staff. Its interface and onboarding process are not prominently rated, implying it may not excel in ease of adoption or usability.
Conversely, Mews scores a 4.74/5 in ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight how quickly new staff can be trained and how easily staff can access functions across devices.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme offers essential POS functions but lacks advanced operational features, with no additional capabilities reported. Its feature set is limited, focusing primarily on basic sales and inventory management.
Mews provides 29 distinct features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, recipes, analytics, and integrations with accounting software. These features enable a holistic approach to hotel F&B operations and revenue management.
Edge: Mews.
There are no recent reviews or ratings available for E&S Kassensysteme’s customer support, making it difficult to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited market engagement or support resources.
Mews boasts a 4.43/5 support rating, with reviews describing their support team as reliable, solution-oriented, and responsive. Hoteliers appreciate the onboarding assistance, especially given the platform’s extensive features.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme has zero verified integration partners, offering no indication of compatibility with other hotel or POS systems. This limits its ability to connect with existing hotel tech stacks.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and payment systems like Criton and Right Revenue. This extensive ecosystem supports streamlined operations and data consolidation.
Edge: Mews.
With 156 reviews and recent feedback, Mews’s ratings are significantly higher across all metrics—most notably a 9.32/10 NPS and 95% likelihood to recommend. Users frequently praise its user-friendliness, feature set, and support.
E&S Kassensysteme has no recent reviews, and the absence of ratings suggests very limited or no current user engagement. This makes Mews the clearly favored choice among active hotel operators.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme does not publicly list pricing, implying a custom quote approach likely based on hotel size or requirements. Its lack of a free trial or transparent costs suggests a traditional license model.
Mews charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no implied setup or implementation costs, and offers no free trial. Its transparent pricing model simplifies budgeting for hotels considering this platform.
E&S Kassensysteme is best suited for straightforward transactional environments rather than integrated, guest-centric operations.
Mews is designed for hotels aiming for a modern, integrated technological approach.
Mews POS stands out as the more comprehensive, well-supported solution, especially given its large user base and recent positive reviews. Its feature-rich environment and seamless integrations make it suitable for hotels that want more than just a basic sales tool.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its ease of use, recent reviews, and broad market presence make it the clear choice.
However, if your hotel’s needs are strictly transactional, with no plans for digital ordering or guest engagement, E&S Kassensysteme may suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and features makes it less appealing for most modern properties.
In summary, for most hotels looking to improve guest experience and operational efficiency, Mews offers a safer, more future-proof investment. Prioritize Mews if you want a platform that’s already proven its value with recent, high-rated customer feedback.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, E&S Kassensysteme Picasso et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. E&S Kassensysteme Picasso et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. E&S Kassensysteme Picasso propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
E&S Kassensysteme Picasso : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. E&S Kassensysteme a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits