The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,508 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Canary Technologies se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment & Authorizations and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Arribatec se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,508 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,508 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 1,508 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Canary Technologies apprecient surtout contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, tandis que ceux de Arribatec mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notifications automatiques
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration technique
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Enregistrement sans contact pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 98 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 1042 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 228 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #1 105 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #1 573 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #1 680 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 116 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #1 1308 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 65 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #1 27 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #2 11 avis | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to modernize the guest arrival experience, but Canary’s platform offers a broader suite of features and a more established market presence. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize advanced integrations, guest engagement tools, and proven reliability or a more streamlined, innovative approach.
Canary’s extensive feature set and superior review metrics make it the more proven choice, especially for hotels aiming to scale and optimize their contactless check-in processes. Fàcil’s solutions, while promising, lack the depth and customer validation seen with Canary.
Both products address the core challenge of reducing front desk congestion and increasing guest convenience during check-in, but they diverge in scope and sophistication. Canary offers a comprehensive platform with 21 unique features, including ID verification, document scanning, network security, and pre-arrival upselling, which are absent in Fàcil. Meanwhile, Fàcil provides digital self-service options like kiosks, web-apps, holographic check-in, and mobile keys, focusing more on innovation than extensive feature depth.
Canary’s platform has accumulated over 1,390 reviews with a high-rated 4.68/5 overall and recent reviews from the last six months. Fàcil, on the other hand, has no available review data, making Canary the safer choice for reliability and proven performance. Is your hotel ready to invest in a mature, feature-rich platform rather than a newer, less validated solution?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable guest management system that integrates with existing PMS and boosts revenue through upselling, go with Canary. Its extensive feature set, verified integrations with 54 partners, and global market presence support large or growing hotels seeking operational efficiency. If your focus is on innovative, high-tech check-in methods like holographic or mobile key experiences, and your hotel is smaller or experimental, Fàcil may appeal — though it lacks the review-backed track record.
For hotels prioritizing security, automation, and customer support, Canary’s high satisfaction ratings (4.69/5 support, 4.82/5 ease of use) make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel is early in digital transformation and wants cutting-edge tools without extensive integration needs, Fàcil could fit — but beware of the lack of verified customer feedback.
Canary boasts a user rating of 4.82/5 for ease of use, supported by its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (4.68/5), and a large base of positive recent reviews. Many users praise its straightforward setup, which typically takes about 20 minutes, and its ability to integrate with existing systems smoothly. Support and onboarding are also rated highly at 4.69/5, reinforcing its user-friendly reputation.
Fàcil, while innovative with features like holographic check-in, does not have publicly available review data or user ratings for ease of use. Without this information, it’s difficult to gauge how quickly your staff will adapt or how intuitive the interface will be for your team. Edge: Canary.
Canary offers 21 unique features exclusive to its platform, such as ID verification, document scanning, PCI compliance audits, automatic translations, and hotel website check-in portals. It also provides tools for threat lifecycle management, network security, and multi-lingual support, making it a comprehensive solution for security-conscious hotels.
Fàcil’s core features focus on self-service kiosks, web-app check-in, holographic check-in, and mobile keys—innovative, but less extensive. It lacks the depth of operational and security features found in Canary. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s support is highly rated at 4.69/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Clients frequently mention that Canary’s support team actively helps resolve technical issues, which is critical when deploying a system across multiple properties.
Fàcil provides no publicly available review data or detailed support ratings. Without concrete feedback, we cannot confirm its level of support quality. Based on proven track records, Edge: Canary.
Canary integrates with 54 verified partners, including major property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Vingcard, and HotelTime. Its extensive partner network supports seamless operations across a wide range of hotel types and systems.
Fàcil’s integration count is only five, with limited partner options, including only some basic self-service functionalities. It may require more customization and manual work to connect with your existing tech stack. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s reviews show an average rating of 4.68/5, with 95% of users recommending it and recent reviews confirming ongoing satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes and segments praise its ease of use, support, and ability to increase revenue.
Fàcil lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction reliably. Given the strong, recent feedback for Canary, it’s clearly the more trusted option. Edge: Canary.
Canary’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no freemium or trial options, reflecting its enterprise-grade positioning. Fàcil’s pricing details are unavailable, which might suggest a custom quote or less transparent model.
For hotels needing predictable costs and proven ROI, Canary’s transparent pricing provides clarity. Fàcil’s unknown costs make budgeting uncertain, which can be risky without a clear value proposition.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal tech infrastructure, or if you prefer a simple, less feature-heavy solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a mature, integrated platform with proven support and extensive feature depth.
Canary Contactless Check-In is a mature, feature-rich platform supported by extensive reviews, integrations, and proven results across diverse markets. It excels in security, operational efficiency, and revenue growth—making it well-suited for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable solution. Its broad feature set and high user satisfaction guarantee a smoother digital transition.
Fàcil by Arribatec offers innovative tools like holographic check-in and mobile keys, appealing to hotels eager to showcase cutting-edge technology. However, with no review data and limited integrations, it’s better suited for small, experimental properties or those willing to accept a higher risk for a novel experience.
If your hotel values reliability, proven performance, and a comprehensive set of tools, go with Canary. For hotels prioritizing innovation and a unique guest journey, Fàcil could be worth exploring, but with caution.
La tarification des Enregistrement sans contact est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In et Fàcil by Arribatec partagent 5 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de conformité PCI | ||
| Fonctionnalité de vente incitative et de mise à niveau | ||
| Gestion du cycle de vie des menaces | ||
| Préparation à la conformité | ||
| Sécurité Internet | ||
| Tests de pénétration |
Affichage des principales differences. 9 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de... Bien que beaucoup aient trouvé la plateforme Canary conviviale, plusieurs utilisateurs ont signalé des problèmes d'intégration avec leurs systèmes de gestion immobilière (PMS) existants et ont suggéré que des améliorations dans ce domaine permettraient de fluidifier davantage les opérations.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Canary Contactless Check-In et Fàcil by Arribatec partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Contactless Check-in de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Canary Contactless Check-In propose 54 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Fàcil by Arribatec en propose 5. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Canary Contactless Check-In est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Canary Contactless Check-In : Non. Fàcil by Arribatec : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Contactless Check-in proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Canary Technologies a un HT Score de 100 et Arribatec a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits