The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 441 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
myHotel se distingue .
GuestRevu se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.6/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue Reporting and Reporting Dashboard.
Notes comparees basees sur 441 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 441 |
Apres analyse de 441 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de myHotel apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de GuestRevu mettent en avant feedback and reporting, integration and compatibility, ai and automation. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Feedback and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Compatibility
▾
|
|
|
+
AI and Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Dashboard and Interface
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Analyse des sentiments
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestion de la réputation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 161 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 179 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 20 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 19 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 198 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #1 199 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 91 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 37 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 37 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 111 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #2 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #4 3 avis |
Choosing the right reputation management platform for your hotel hinges on your specific needs and priorities. Both myHotel’s Fidelity Online and GuestRevu aim to monitor and improve your online reviews, but they approach this goal very differently. Fidelity Online focuses on extracting reviews from multiple channels with a freemium model, while GuestRevu offers a feature-rich, AI-powered dashboard with extensive integration options. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s operational style and growth stage?
While Fidelity Online provides a straightforward reputation management solution with free access to some review sites, GuestRevu offers a broader set of features, including sentiment analysis, social media tools, and automation. Given the current review data and recent activity, which platform truly offers more value for your investment?
Fidelity Online is designed to gather and process reviews from over 20 sources, including Facebook, Google, TripAdvisor, Expedia, and Booking, with a freemium model allowing free initial testing. Its focus is on extracting and consolidating review data without many advanced features or extensive integrations, making it suitable for smaller or budget-conscious hotels seeking basic reputation oversight.
GuestRevu, by contrast, boasts over 40 verified integrations, including major OTAs and PMS systems, and features like sentiment analysis, alerts, and automated responses. Its comprehensive dashboard and customizable surveys are tailored for hotels wanting detailed insights and operational tools. Do you need a simple reputation extractor, or are you looking for a full-scale review and guest feedback system?
If your hotel requires a straightforward reputation overview from multiple review channels with no initial cost, Fidelity Online’s freemium approach makes it an attractive option. It’s best for small properties or hotels new to online reputation management that want to start without heavy investment.
If your hotel values detailed analytics, automation, and integration with various systems, GuestRevu is the clear choice. It’s suitable for mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and chains that need ongoing, in-depth review monitoring combined with operational tools and rapid response capabilities.
GuestRevu scores a high 4.63 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Its onboarding process and user experience are tailored for busy hospitality teams, with features like customizable surveys and automated alerts designed to simplify review management.
Fidelity Online, on the other hand, has no recent review data on ease of use, but given its limited features and focus on review extraction, it likely offers a less complex experience. However, the lack of detailed UI feedback suggests it might not match GuestRevu’s polished, user-friendly approach.
Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu provides an extensive set of 31 features, including sentiment analysis, social media integration, revenue reporting, alerts, multi-property management, and AI-generated reply automation. These tools empower your team to proactively manage reputation, analyze guest sentiment, and automate responses efficiently.
Fidelity Online offers no unique features beyond review collection and extraction, with no additional tools or automation. Its limited feature set means it’s primarily a review aggregator rather than a comprehensive reputation management platform.
Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s support scores a very high 4.75 out of 5, with reviews highlighting responsive and helpful customer service. Users praise the dedicated team for guiding them through onboarding and ongoing assistance, which is critical for smooth implementation.
Fidelity Online has no recent support ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its support quality. Given the detailed support feedback for GuestRevu, it clearly offers a more reliable service experience.
Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu surpasses Fidelity Online significantly with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS, and social media platforms. It offers seamless integration with systems like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and other hospitality tools, enabling centralized review and guest feedback management.
Fidelity Online has only 2 verified partners—SiteMinder and Cloudbeds—limiting its ability to connect with various systems and platforms. For hotels that rely on multiple integrations, GuestRevu provides more flexibility and scalability.
Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s recent reviews and high ratings indicate strong user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels. With an overall rating of 4.61/5 from 386 reviews and a recent NPS score of 9.42/10, it’s clearly valued for its ease of use, support, and functionality.
Fidelity Online has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Based on available data, GuestRevu is the more highly-rated platform among hoteliers.
Edge: GuestRevu.
Fidelity Online’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it offers a freemium model with free review extraction from three OTAs and three competitors. Additional features or integrations likely come with fees, but specifics are unclear.
GuestRevu charges $100/month for its core platform, with no mention of tiered pricing or additional costs. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting easier for hotels planning for operational expenses.
Not ideal if your hotel needs detailed analytics, automation, or multi-system integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel has a very limited budget or only needs basic review monitoring.
Fidelity Online offers a straightforward, no-cost review extraction service suitable for small or budget-conscious hotels. Its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews make it less suited for hotels needing ongoing engagement or advanced analytics.
GuestRevu, by contrast, provides a full suite of reputation management features, with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. For hotels aiming for a comprehensive approach to guest feedback and reputation, it becomes the clear choice.
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich reputation platform, GuestRevu will serve you better. Its extensive integrations and automation tools can significantly improve your review monitoring and guest experience management.
However, if your priority is a free, simple review extraction tool with minimal needs, Fidelity Online could be enough—though it’s important to consider its limited recent support and reviews. For most hotels looking for a dependable reputation management partner, GuestRevu remains the stronger option.
La tarification des Gestion de la réputation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Fidelity Online et GuestRevu partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Alertes et notifications | ||
| Analyse des sentiments | ||
| Des médias sociaux | ||
| Déclaration de revenus | ||
| Tableau de bord des rapports | ||
| Veille concurrentielle |
Affichage des principales differences. 19 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"GuestRevu has helped us so much over the past two years as we see our small business growing – the reviews from guests are like gold, and most of our bookings have been made becaus..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since implementing GuestRevu, our complaints have actually come down, because of the fact that we have so many repeat guests and now we can interact with them in much more detail...."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for serv... Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for service enhancement and operational efficiency. The system's capacity to gather insights from multiple platforms enables hotels to quickly identify both strengths and areas needing improvement.
GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing r... GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing review management. However, some users express a need for expanded integration options, including additional property management systems and direct connections to platforms like TripAdvisor to further streamline operations.
Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time a... Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time and consistency. While praised for efficiency, some users find AI-generated responses overly mechanical or lacking a personalized touch, suggesting room for refinement.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
L'analyse des sentiments de la plateforme est reconnue pour son classement pertinent des commentaires en catégories, bien qu'elle soit parfois jugée i... L'analyse des sentiments de la plateforme est reconnue pour son classement pertinent des commentaires en catégories, bien qu'elle soit parfois jugée inexacte. Les utilisateurs signalent des problèmes d'interprétation du ton par l'algorithme, notamment du sarcasme, ce qui nuit à la clarté des analyses automatisées.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Fidelity Online et GuestRevu partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Reputation Management de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Fidelity Online propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que GuestRevu en propose 40. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. GuestRevu est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Fidelity Online : Non. GuestRevu : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Reputation Management proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. myHotel a un HT Score de 0 et GuestRevu a 96. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété