The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
ICG Software se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Profiles.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme PCI Compliant and Check Splitting.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de ICG Software apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right hotel POS system is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and ensuring your team can work efficiently. Both FrontRest by ICG Software and Mews POS aim to address these needs, but they do so with very different levels of market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
FrontRest has been in the market since 1985 but has virtually no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its current performance or support quality. Conversely, Mews POS, established in 2012 with a global footprint, boasts 156 recent reviews and an impressive 95% likelihood to recommend among hoteliers, indicating a proven track record in hospitality. How do these differences influence your choice?
FrontRest by ICG Software offers a comprehensive and scalable property management system tailored to a broad range of hospitality businesses, including hotels and restaurants. However, it lacks recent user feedback, and its ratings are nonexistent, leaving you uncertain about support quality, ease of use, or innovation. Mews POS, by contrast, is a purpose-built hotel restaurant POS system with a modern, user-friendly design backed by over 150 recent reviews, reflecting current user satisfaction and ongoing product development.
While FrontRest claims to improve efficiency and resource management, the absence of recent reviews raises questions about how well it meets modern hotel needs. Mews POS demonstrates clear advantages through its high usability scores and positive feedback, especially in digital ordering, online payments, and integration with PMS. Given the recent reviews and high recommendation rate, is FrontRest still a competitive choice for your hotel?
If your hotel requires a flexible, integrated POS system that covers multiple operational needs—like reservations, billing, and customer data—FrontRest’s claim of an all-in-one solution might be appealing, but the lack of recent feedback makes it risky. If you prioritize a proven, highly rated POS platform with a strong focus on restaurant and hotel integration, Mews POS should be your choice.
For large or growing hotels needing robust features like digital ordering, payment processing, and multi-device usability, Mews’ 66 recent reviews and 4.74-star rating showcase its effectiveness. Conversely, if your hotel operates in niche markets where legacy systems still suffice, FrontRest’s long history might seem attractive, but the absence of current reviews diminishes confidence. Would you prefer a product with proven user satisfaction or one with an untested reputation?
Mews POS scores an exceptional 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, seamless onboarding, and cross-device flexibility. Users highlight how staff can quickly adapt thanks to its modern design, which simplifies daily tasks like orders, billing, and payments. Many reviews commend the efficient onboarding process, with staff adopting the system within days.
In contrast, FrontRest has a zero-star rating across all categories, providing no recent feedback on usability, support, or onboarding. This makes it challenging to gauge how user-friendly or supportive the platform truly is today. Given the current high ratings and positive reviews, Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers 27 shared features with FrontRest, but it outstrips the latter with 2 unique capabilities: PCI compliance and check splitting. These enhance security and operational flexibility, especially for handling multiple payment types and simplifying billing processes.
FrontRest features 11 exclusive functionalities such as review collection, menu sync, and guest profiles, but its overall feature count is overshadowed by Mews. With Mews continuously evolving and boasting an active marketplace with over 1,000 integrations, it provides more advanced tools for modern hoteliers. Which features are most essential for your hotel’s growth?
Mews POS’s support is highly rated at 4.43/5, with reviews emphasizing reliable, solution-oriented assistance and structured onboarding. Users describe support as responsive, with helpful guidance during implementation, reducing downtime and frustration.
FrontRest’s support scores are unknown, with no recent reviews to evaluate. Its long-standing history does not equate to current support quality, a significant risk for hotels relying on timely help. Given Mews’s recent positive feedback, edge: Mews POS.
Mews’s ecosystem includes 336 verified integrations, spanning channel managers, payment gateways, and third-party tools like Criton, Sage, and local marketing platforms. This extensive network enables hotels to connect their existing systems effortlessly.
In comparison, FrontRest has only one verified partner, FrontHotel, limiting its integration flexibility and scalability. For hotels seeking a connected, adaptable tech stack, Mews’s broad integration options are a clear advantage. Edge: Mews POS.
Given the lack of recent reviews, FrontRest’s user satisfaction remains unknown, making it impossible to assess. Mews, however, boasts a 9.32/10 NPS score based on 66 recent reviews, with 95% of hoteliers recommending it, demonstrating strong current approval.
Mews’s positive feedback comes from a diverse range of hotel types, including luxury, boutique, and city center hotels, indicating broad applicability. For reliable, current ratings, Mews clearly leads.
FrontRest does not publicly disclose pricing details, making direct comparisons difficult. It likely involves customized quotes based on hotel size and requirements. Meanwhile, Mews POS charges a straightforward starting price of $200 per month, with no implementation fees or hidden costs.
This transparent pricing model offers clarity and predictability, enabling better budget planning. For cost-conscious hotels, Mews’s clear pricing provides confidence; FrontRest’s unknown costs add risk.
The core difference lies in market presence and user validation: Mews POS has a well-documented track record with hundreds of reviews and a high recommendation rate, while FrontRest offers a broad feature set but lacks recent, verified feedback.
If your hotel values proven performance, ease of use, and a vibrant community of users, Mews POS is the clear choice. It provides an intuitive, reliable, and well-supported platform that can adapt as your property grows.
Choose FrontRest only if you have existing experience with the platform, or if your operations require a highly customized, legacy solution that isn’t reliant on recent reviews. For modern hospitality, Mews’s current market validation makes it the safer, smarter investment.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, FrontRest et Mews POS partagent 27 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Campagnes marketing | ||
| Collection d'avis | ||
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Profils des invités | ||
| Recommandations de serveur | ||
| Segmentation | ||
| Synchronisation des menus |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. FrontRest et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. FrontRest propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
FrontRest : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. ICG Software a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits