The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
GODO se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $1,100/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de GODO apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both GODO and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline hotel management but do so with different approaches and strengths. Your decision hinges on which features, support, and scalability align best with your property's needs.
GODO offers a simplified, automation-focused platform with a smaller but growing user base, primarily specializing in vacation rentals. HotelTime provides a large-scale, fully integrated PMS with extensive features and a global presence. Which of these aligns with your hotel’s trajectory?
GODO, founded in 2012, caters mainly to vacation rental and smaller property operators, emphasizing automation and guest communication. HotelTime, established in 2002, serves a broad range of hotel types, including resorts and large chains, offering a more feature-rich environment.
While GODO’s reviews are limited and lack recent data, HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. HotelTime’s recent reviews underscore its robust support and ongoing feature improvements, making it the more reliable choice for current market needs.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, automation-centered PMS focused on guest communication and simplified operations, GODO might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature set (only 3 unique features) suggest it’s better suited for small vacation rental managers or property portfolios that prioritize automation over depth.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive platform with extensive modules like POS, CRM, revenue management, and integrations, HotelTime should be your go-to. It’s proven in diverse hotel segments, from boutique to large resorts, with a clear focus on operational efficiency and scalability.
For most hotels looking for a proven, well-supported solution with a broad feature set, HotelTime is the safer investment.
GODO’s reviews do not detail UI or onboarding experiences, but with no recent feedback, its ease of use remains uncertain. HotelTime, on the other hand, scores a 4.66/5 in ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface and quick onboarding.
Many hotel staff find HotelTime’s system easy to adopt, facilitating quick training and daily operations. Its support team’s responsiveness further simplifies the learning curve, giving it a clear edge.
GODO offers only 3 unique features: guest communication (SMS), centralized messaging, and guest messaging—simple but limited. HotelTime provides 20 features unique to its platform, including online check-in, digital registration, spa & wellness modules, revenue management, and integrated ID scanning.
HotelTime’s broader feature set supports full property operations, from guest engagement to revenue optimization. Its numerous modules make it more versatile and capable of handling complex hotel needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s support ratings and review details are unavailable, raising questions about its responsiveness and onboarding quality. HotelTime, however, has a support score of 4.73/5, with many reviews praising its quick response and helpful staff.
HotelTime’s recent reviews mention prompt assistance, comprehensive onboarding, and ongoing support, which are critical for smooth hotel operations. Its dedicated support team gives it the clear advantage here.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO has five verified partners, including AeroGuest and Profitroom, with a few exclusive integrations like TourDesk and Sweeply. HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including common partners like AeroGuest and Profitroom, plus a wide array of additional systems like Bookboost, STR, and Umi Digital.
The extensive list of HotelTime’s integrations enables your hotel to connect with more third-party tools, streamlining operations across multiple platforms. Its connectivity offers greater flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s ratings are not available, so no recent or comprehensive hotel reviews exist to gauge user satisfaction. HotelTime has a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its reliability and support.
In particular, properties like resorts and boutique hotels frequently praise HotelTime’s ease of use and operational improvements. Its large review volume and high ratings make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s exact pricing details are unavailable, implying a possible custom or enterprise pricing model. HotelTime charges a base price of $600/month, with no implementation or per-room fees mentioned.
While GODO’s cost may vary based on custom solutions, HotelTime’s transparent pricing offers better predictability and value, especially given its extensive features and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that GODO is a niche, automation-driven PMS with a limited feature set, ideal for small, vacation-rental-focused properties. HotelTime, by contrast, is a comprehensive, scalable platform suitable for a broad range of hotel types and sizes.
If your hotel values extensive management tools, integrations, and proven support, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its large review base and recent positive feedback confirm its reliability and capacity to grow with your property.
Choose GODO if your focus is simple guest messaging and automation within a small portfolio. Opt for HotelTime if you seek a versatile, full-featured PMS with proven support and a strong market presence.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, GODO et HotelTime PMS partagent 31 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 11 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. GODO et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. GODO propose 5 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
GODO : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. GODO a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits