The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Guestnet se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
TigerTMS se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 165 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 165 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Guestnet apprecient surtout user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive, tandis que ceux de TigerTMS mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 56 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #2 85 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #7 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 3 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly influence your guest experience and operational efficiency. Guestnet by Guestnet has established itself as a leading platform, boasting a high review count, recent positive feedback, and a suite of features. In contrast, iPortal by Tiger TMS, despite its long-standing presence, has not accumulated reviews or ratings, making it harder to gauge its current relevance or performance. Given this, which platform truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to serve as comprehensive guest communication solutions, but they diverge in their approach. Guestnet is a fully customizable web-app with extensive integrations and features, while iPortal emphasizes mobile guest services tightly integrated with PMS, focusing on operational streamlining. Are you seeking a proven, well-rated platform with a broad feature set, or a solution that emphasizes mobile control and automation?
Guestnet and iPortal both target enhancing guest engagement and operational efficiency, but their strengths differ. Guestnet’s near-perfect ratings (96.36/100 on the HT Score, 4.74/5 Ease of Use, and 4.82/5 Support) reflect a mature, well-reviewed platform with over 150 recent reviews. Its features include request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, local recommendations, multilingual translations, and digital check-in/out—all highly valued by hotels.
iPortal, on the other hand, has no review ratings or counts, making it difficult to evaluate its current user satisfaction or performance. Its core focus is on mobile services like chat, F&B ordering, HVAC control, bill viewing, and auto check-out, integrated with PMS. While iPortal’s platform might appeal for operational automation, the lack of recent feedback or reviews suggests less proven reliability or user satisfaction.
Given the clear review backing for Guestnet and its recent positive feedback, it becomes the more trustworthy choice. Does your hotel prioritize a platform with a proven track record and extensive feature set? Or are you comfortable exploring a newer, unreviewed solution?
If your hotel values a robust, highly-rated guest app with comprehensive features and proven support, Guestnet is the clear winner. It’s suitable for a range of hotel segments, including luxury properties and boutique hotels, and excels in personalized communication, upselling, and multi-channel dissemination.
Conversely, if your hotel’s priority is streamlined mobile services tightly integrated with PMS—focusing on features like chat, F&B ordering, HVAC, and automatic check-out—iPortal might seem appealing, but the lack of reviews diminishes confidence. For hotels seeking immediate, proven impact, Guestnet’s extensive feature set and recent user endorsements make it the better choice.
In summary, for hotels wanting a reliable, well-rated guest app with proven ROI, Guestnet is the recommended platform. If your team is exploring new tools without current user feedback, iPortal might be worth a cautious trial, but it remains unverified in today’s market.
Guestnet’s user-friendly interface consistently receives high praise, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating and recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and strong support. Hotels report that staff and guests find it straightforward to adopt, reducing training times and operational friction. The platform’s customizable web-app works across devices, further simplifying guest access.
iPortal lacks any recent reviews or ratings, so its usability and onboarding experience are unverified. While it emphasizes mobile-first design, the absence of user feedback makes it impossible to confidently assess whether it is easier to implement or operate.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, local recommendations, multilingual translations, and digital check-in/out—covering a broad spectrum of guest engagement needs. Its features are designed to enhance personalization, automate processes, and facilitate cross-channel communication, which many hotels find enhances guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
iPortal’s feature set appears limited to basic mobile services like chat, F&B ordering, HVAC, and bill viewing, with no detailed feature count available. Its offerings are more operationally focused and less comprehensive in guest engagement compared to Guestnet.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s customer support and onboarding ratings (4.82/5 and 4.66/5 respectively) reflect a responsive team that assists hotels throughout implementation and daily use. Recent reviews highlight support’s helpfulness, quick response times, and proactive communication, which can be crucial during initial setup and troubleshooting.
iPortal offers no recent reviews or ratings, so its support quality remains unverified. Without concrete feedback, it’s difficult to determine if its customer service aligns with your hotel’s expectations.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet has verified integrations with 20 partners, including major PMS and property management solutions like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Shiji Group. Its flexible API and partnership network enable hotels to connect with local tourism platforms and other digital tools, improving automation and guest data management.
iPortal claims integration with PMS and various operational features, but has no publicly verified partner count. Its integration ecosystem appears less established, which could limit automation options.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews are recent, with 152 reviews in the last six months and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and boutique properties, praise its ease of use, support, and feature richness, reflecting high satisfaction.
iPortal has no reviews or ratings to assess. Without feedback, it cannot be confidently recommended, especially compared to Guestnet’s proven reputation.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500/month for its core package, with no mention of hidden fees or long-term commitments, making it straightforward for budgeting. No trial or freemium options are available, but the platform’s perceived value justifies its cost.
iPortal’s pricing details are not publicly available, which complicates direct cost comparison. Its lack of transparency suggests potential variability or custom quotes, possibly making it less predictable for hotel budgets.
Guestnet and iPortal serve different needs, but the proven, feature-rich, and highly-rated Guestnet makes it the preferable choice for most hotels today. Its extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive feature set give it a decisive edge.
If your hotel seeks a trustworthy, adaptable platform that enhances guest communication and operational efficiency, Guestnet is the clear solution. Its broad integrations, high support ratings, and proven impact make it the best fit for hotels aiming to elevate their guest experience reliably.
iPortal may appeal to hotels with specific mobile automation needs and existing PMS systems, but without current reviews, its effectiveness remains unverified. For most hoteliers, sticking with a platform backed by proven user satisfaction will deliver better results.
This comprehensive comparison aims to equip your team with the clarity needed to make an informed choice. Given Guestnet’s recent reviews and extensive feature set, it is the safer, more reliable investment for your hotel’s digital guest experience.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Guestnet et iPortal (by Tiger TMS) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Annuaire des hôtels | ||
| Application Web | ||
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Gestion des demandes | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Recommandations locales |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Guestnet et iPortal (by Tiger TMS) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Guestnet propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que iPortal (by Tiger TMS) en propose 28. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Guestnet est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Guestnet : Non. iPortal (by Tiger TMS) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Guestnet a un HT Score de 96 et TigerTMS a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits