The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 154 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Innsoft (Yanolja) se distingue en ease of use .
Visual Matrix PMS se distingue en customer support and onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
Notes comparees basees sur 154 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 2 | 152 |
Apres analyse de 154 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Innsoft (Yanolja) apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Visual Matrix PMS mettent en avant technical support challenges, interface conviviale, comprehensive reporting tools. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Vitesse du système et disponibilité des fonctionnalités
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #45 1 avis | #18 23 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #42 1 avis | #2 117 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #11 5 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #16 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 38 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #16 17 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #1 124 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 44 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #37 2 avis | #7 141 avis |
| Europe | — | #32 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #18 2 avis |
Choosing between Innsoft HMS by Yanolja and Visual Matrix PMS boils down to your hotel’s operational needs and how you prioritize ease of use, feature set, and support. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve very different hotel types and management styles. Innsoft, with a tiny review base and no recent activity, appears less adaptable, while Visual Matrix boasts a broad feature set and more recent client engagement. Which platform aligns better with your goals?
While Innsoft offers basic functionality and simplicity, Visual Matrix provides a wider range of features and modern integrations. Do you prefer a straightforward tool or a more comprehensive hotel management system that can scale with your property’s growth?
Innsoft’s limited review count (just 2 reviews) and no recent feedback make it difficult to assess its current performance or support quality. Its overall score of 3.5/5 and a perfect ease of use rating of 5/5 suggest a simple, user-friendly interface—yet, the lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing updates and engagement.
In contrast, Visual Matrix, with 143 reviews and recent activity, scores an overall 3.75/5 and an ease of use rating of 4.43/5. Its support ratings are also higher, and recent reviews praise its ability to streamline operations, especially for understaffed teams. Given the more active user base and recent feedback, Visual Matrix is the more reliable choice for current hotel management needs. Are you comfortable with a system that might lack recent updates, or do you prefer a platform with proven ongoing support?
If your hotel needs robust features, extensive integrations, and support for multiple departments—like housekeeping, revenue management, and online booking—Visual Matrix is the better fit. Its 55 unique features, including a booking engine, channel manager, guest communication tools, and real-time reporting, make it suitable for mid-sized to large properties looking to optimize revenue and operational control.
On the other hand, if your property is small, with basic reservation and management needs, Innsoft could appeal due to its simple interface and cost-effective nature. However, its limited features and outdated review activity make it less suitable for hotels seeking growth or more sophisticated operations. For most hotels evaluating current options, Visual Matrix offers a more comprehensive platform.
Innsoft scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its straightforward, intuitive interface, and minimal training requirements. Its simple design allows staff to become proficient quickly, especially for small properties or those wanting less complexity.
Visual Matrix, rated at 4.43/5, also emphasizes user-friendliness but is considered slightly more complex due to its extensive feature set. Recent reviews commend its dashboard and mobile app, which facilitate quick access and task management, but initial learning curves are higher.
Edge: Innsoft HMS, if simplicity and minimal onboarding are your priorities.
Innsoft offers basic property management functionalities, primarily reservation handling, billing, and guest control, but lacks advanced modules. It does not list any exclusive features, focusing instead on core management.
Visual Matrix, with 55 unique features, provides tools like a channel manager, booking engine, guest messaging, housekeeping mobile app, revenue management, and integrated payment solutions. Its feature richness supports end-to-end hotel operations, making it more adaptable for diverse hotel types.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS, thanks to its extensive, specialized features.
Innsoft’s customer support rating is 3/5, with reviews indicating a basic support experience and limited recent feedback. Users note issues with reservation delays and minimal support interaction, which could impact urgent needs.
Visual Matrix scores significantly higher at 4.34/5, with recent reviews describing knowledgeable, helpful, and responsive support. Its 24/7 online assistance and proactive customer communication are highly valued in the current environment.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS, due to its stronger, more recent support reviews.
Innsoft integrates with only three verified partners, including Yanolja Cloud Solution and Amadeus, offering limited connectivity options.
Visual Matrix offers 23 verified integrations, including major booking channels like SiteMinder, Hotel Investor Apps, and Aven Hospitality, along with native modules like CRS and guest CRM. This extensive ecosystem enables smooth connectivity and operational flexibility.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS, with a broader and more versatile integration network.
Innsoft’s reviews are minimal and dated, with one 5/5 rating praising its control for hotel owners and another 2/5 criticizing its simplicity and lack of advanced features. Its review count (2) and absence of recent feedback hinder a clear confidence level.
Visual Matrix, with 137 recent reviews, garners a 4/5 rating from branded hotels and a 3/5 from other segments. Its recent reviews focus on operational efficiency, mobile usability, and customer service, indicating consistent satisfaction among larger hotel groups.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS, due to its more recent and abundant positive reviews.
Innsoft does not publicly list its pricing or offer a trial, suggesting a custom quote or enterprise-level approach. This lack of transparency may hinder smaller hotels from budgeting or evaluating ROI easily.
Visual Matrix charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees listed. Its transparent pricing allows for easier budgeting and comparison for hotels seeking a feature-rich platform at a predictable cost.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS, thanks to its clear and accessible pricing structure.
Not ideal if...
In summary, Innsoft suits very small or budget-conscious hotels that want straightforward management without complex features.
Not ideal if...
In essence, Visual Matrix is best for established or growing hotels seeking a flexible, scalable management system.
Innsoft HMS offers the allure of simplicity and affordability but remains limited by its small user base, outdated reviews, and infrequent updates. If your hotel requires a straightforward, no-fuss system and your operations are minimal, it may suffice temporarily.
Visual Matrix, with its broad feature set, recent reviews, and active support, is better suited for properties that need operational efficiency, revenue growth tools, and integration flexibility. Its recent enhancements and proven customer satisfaction make it the recommended choice for most mid-sized and larger hotels.
For hoteliers prioritizing modernity, support, and scalability, Visual Matrix PMS stands out as the more dependable, future-proof solution. Innsoft might appeal for very small properties with basic needs, but most hotels will find Visual Matrix a more robust partner in their growth journey.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Innsoft HMS et Visual Matrix PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Moteur de réservation de groupe | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 43 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateu... La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateurs mentionnent des difficultés initiales lors de la transition depuis d'autres systèmes.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Innsoft HMS et Visual Matrix PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Innsoft HMS propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Matrix PMS en propose 23. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Innsoft HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.4/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Innsoft HMS : Non. Visual Matrix PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Innsoft (Yanolja) a un HT Score de 0 et Visual Matrix PMS a 80. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits