The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,416 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en customer support and onboarding — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Innsoft (Yanolja) se distingue en ease of use .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,416 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,414 | 2 |
Apres analyse de 1,416 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, tandis que ceux de Innsoft (Yanolja) mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 675 avis | #45 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 235 avis | #42 1 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 51 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #4 5 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 245 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 145 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 96 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 532 avis | #37 2 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #4 166 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 201 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #3 13 avis | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Innsoft HMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, integrated platform with extensive features and a large global presence, while Innsoft provides a straightforward, easy-to-use solution with a focus on simplicity and affordability. Both aim to streamline hotel management but diverge significantly in scale and sophistication.
Cloudbeds is the clear frontrunner due to its extensive review base, recent user feedback, and proven impact on property operations worldwide. Innsoft’s smaller footprint and limited recent feedback make it less suitable for hotels seeking a robust, scalable system. So, which software better suits your hotel’s current and future needs?
Cloudbeds and Innsoft both address essential hotel management functions, like reservations, billing, and guest communication. Cloudbeds, with over 1,200 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, demonstrates widespread trust from hoteliers across diverse property types globally. Innsoft, with only two reviews and a 3.5/5 rating, has a minimal recent feedback pool, limiting confidence in its current performance.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation capabilities, and extensive integrations, reinforcing its reputation as a scalable, reliable platform. Innsoft’s reviews focus on simplicity and cost-effectiveness but lack recent insights or broad user validation. Do you want a proven, well-supported platform or a more basic, budget-friendly option?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable management system that unifies operations, revenue, and distribution, Cloudbeds is the better fit. It’s ideal if you aim to grow, optimize revenue, and improve guest experiences through automation and integrations. Conversely, Innsoft may suit small properties or motels seeking a straightforward system without complex features or extensive support.
For properties with ambitions to expand or leverage advanced features like revenue management, multi-channel distribution, and automation, Cloudbeds’s larger feature set and global presence make it the clear choice. Innsoft’s simplicity and lower cost appeal if your hotel prioritizes basic functionality and ease of use over scalability.
Cloudbeds’s user interface is praised for its intuitiveness, with a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating and positive reviews about quick staff onboarding. Users appreciate its mobile responsiveness and straightforward navigation, though some mention a learning curve for advanced features.
Innsoft scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simplicity and clarity, suitable for staff with minimal training. However, its minimal features and lack of recent updates may limit long-term usability for growing hotels. Edge: Innsoft.
Cloudbeds’s platform boasts over 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, online check-in, automated reporting, multi-lingual support, and integrated payment processing. It also offers a broad array of automation tools and integrations, making it a true all-in-one system.
Innsoft’s platform is more limited, focusing primarily on reservation management, guest check-ins/outs, and basic billing. It does not offer advanced features like revenue management, channel management, or automation, which are vital for modern, growth-oriented hotels. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support ratings are high, with a 4.38/5 score and recent reviews praising its responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and proactive onboarding. Customers highlight its quick troubleshooting and dedicated support teams, especially during onboarding.
Innsoft’s customer support ratings are not available, and reviews are scarce. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive support infrastructure and recent positive feedback, it clearly provides better assistance for hoteliers. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including popular OTAs, payment gateways, POS systems, and revenue management tools. Its ability to connect with a vast ecosystem simplifies operations and reduces manual tasks.
Innsoft has only three verified partners, mainly basic reservation and billing integrations. This limited connectivity restricts scalability and may force manual data entry or incompatible systems. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds, with a 4.62/5 rating based on 1,219 reviews, is highly rated across all hotel segments, especially boutique hotels and hostels, with recent reviews highlighting its reliability and ease of use. Innsoft’s limited review count and a 3.5/5 score reflect less confidence and less recent user feedback, making Cloudbeds the preferred choice.
Cloudbeds’s extensive positive feedback and higher overall ratings show its broad acceptance and effectiveness. Innsoft’s minimal recent reviews imply less ongoing support and innovation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade features. Innsoft’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but its simpler setup suggests a lower cost, suitable for small properties with limited budgets.
Because Cloudbeds’s higher price correlates with its extensive features and support, it offers more value for growing hotels. Innsoft may be more affordable initially but could incur additional costs as your hotel scales or requires more advanced tools.
Not ideal if you operate a very small property with no plans for expansion or need only basic management functions.
Not ideal if you plan to expand, need automation, or require detailed revenue and distribution management.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform trusted worldwide, with recent reviews supporting its robustness and ease of use. Its extensive feature set and integrations make it suitable for hotels looking to grow and optimize revenue.
Choose Cloudbeds if your hotel values automation, detailed analytics, and a platform that adapts with your growth. It’s the stronger choice for ambitious properties seeking operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Innsoft’s simpler, more affordable system suits very small properties or motels that need basic management tools and minimal support. It’s a good fit if your priorities are cost, ease of use, and straightforward reservation management, without the complexity of advanced features.
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’s large review base, recent positive feedback, and extensive capabilities position it as the clear leader for hotels ready to scale. Innsoft can serve small, straightforward operations but may fall short as your needs evolve.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS et Innsoft HMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 78 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds HMS et Innsoft HMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds HMS propose 189 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Innsoft HMS en propose 3. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Innsoft HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds HMS : Non. Innsoft HMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et Innsoft (Yanolja) a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits