The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Guestnet se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payments.
LasoExperience se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 165 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 165 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Guestnet apprecient surtout user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive, tandis que ceux de LasoExperience mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 56 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #2 85 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #7 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 3 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing the right hotel guest app is critical to delivering exceptional guest experiences and streamlining operations. Both Guestnet and LasoExperience claim to enhance guest engagement, but their approaches and market presences differ significantly. Guestnet, with its extensive reviews and recent feedback, offers a proven, feature-rich solution, while LasoExperience remains less established with minimal review data. Your decision should hinge on your hotel's specific needs and the robustness of each platform’s ecosystem.
Guestnet and LasoExperience both aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency but target different hotel types and maturity levels. Guestnet’s platform is highly regarded for its ease of use, integration capabilities, and recent customer satisfaction, evidenced by over 150 reviews and a high NPS score. Conversely, LasoExperience, with only three verified partners and no recent reviews, lacks proven market traction.
Guestnet’s strengths include its extensive integration options, a broad regional presence, and advanced features like digital payments. LasoExperience emphasizes hyper-personalized guest interactions through AI and marketing automation but has yet to demonstrate widespread adoption or deliver measurable hotel benefits. Are you seeking a proven, well-supported solution or an emerging platform still demonstrating its value?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest app with a track record of high satisfaction, choose Guestnet. It’s ideal for properties that require deep integration with PMS and other systems, plus features like payments, digital compendiums, and multi-channel communication. Guestnet's extensive review base, recent positive feedback, and proven ROI make it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique hotels, and resorts seeking operational efficiency and guest engagement.
If your hotel emphasizes hyper-personalized marketing, segmented guest outreach, and revenue growth through tailored campaigns, consider LasoExperience. Its focus on AI-driven recommendations and guest data management suits small to medium hotels prioritizing innovative marketing. However, the platform’s limited reviews and regional presence suggest it may not yet be suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, mature guest app.
Guestnet boasts a user-friendly interface, with a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74/5 and an average onboarding score of 4.66/5 based on recent reviews. Customers consistently praise its intuitive design, clear information presentation, and automation features that reduce staff workload. Support responsiveness and well-structured onboarding processes further ease adoption, helping your team quickly integrate the system without disruptions.
LasoExperience, lacking detailed review data and a user rating, provides no clear insights into its usability or onboarding experience. With only two employees in the company and no publicly available user feedback, it’s difficult to assess how easily your staff could adopt this platform. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 11 shared features, including digital communication, PMS integration, and a unique payments module—an important differentiator. Its exclusive feature, payments, allows seamless billing and upselling, directly impacting revenue. Guestnet’s digital guest compendiums and multi-channel publishing capabilities provide comprehensive service delivery.
LasoExperience, with only three verified integrations—Maestro PMS, Book4Time, and Oracle Hospitality—has fewer partnership options, limiting its ecosystem. Its core strength lies in AI-driven marketing automation and guest data analysis, but it lacks the diverse feature set seen in Guestnet. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s customer support scores a high 4.82/5, with reviewers highlighting its helpful, proactive team and smooth onboarding. Feedback includes comments like, “Support is always available and very helpful,” and “The onboarding process was straightforward,” indicating reliable assistance during setup and ongoing use.
LasoExperience provides no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge its customer service quality. Its small team size (two employees) suggests limited support resources, which could impact response times and issue resolution. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 20 verified partners, including major names like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit, covering a broad range of hotel management systems and service providers. Its extensive integration network enables hotels to connect seamlessly across PMS, POS, and other operational tools, reducing manual work and errors.
LasoExperience has only three verified integrations: Maestro PMS, Book4Time, and Oracle Hospitality. This limited ecosystem constrains its ability to fit into diverse hotel tech stacks and might require additional custom development for broader compatibility. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s recent reviews and high ratings reflect a strong user base, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and an overall score of 96.36. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and resort properties, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
LasoExperience, with no publicly available reviews, cannot be rated by hoteliers. Its market presence and customer feedback are minimal, making it a less reliable choice for properties seeking proven satisfaction metrics. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or trial periods. The flat monthly rate simplifies budgeting and provides transparency, especially for hotels looking for predictable costs.
Pricing details for LasoExperience are unavailable, suggesting it may be a custom or quote-based solution. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare value directly or assess affordability, especially for smaller hotels or those on tighter budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guestnet and LasoExperience serve different needs within the hotel industry. Guestnet’s platform excels at core guest communication, integrations, and operational support, proven by its substantial review base and recent positive feedback. LasoExperience, while promising AI-driven personalization and marketing automation, remains untested at scale and offers limited integration options.
Choose Guestnet if you need a reliable, feature-rich app with proven hotel success, especially if your property benefits from extensive integrations and a high support standard. Its broad market presence and recent reviews give confidence in its ability to deliver consistent results.
Opt for LasoExperience if your hotel’s strategy is heavily focused on hyper-personalization, advanced marketing automation, and innovating guest interactions. Be aware, however, that its limited reviews and regional presence suggest it’s best suited for early adopters willing to take a calculated risk.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a trusted, well-supported app with recent validation, Guestnet is the clear choice. LasoExperience may appeal to innovative hotels with a strong digital marketing focus but requires further validation before considering as a primary solution.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Guestnet et Laso Experience partagent 11 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Paiements |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Guestnet et Laso Experience partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Guestnet propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Laso Experience en propose 3. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Guestnet est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Guestnet : Non. Laso Experience : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Guestnet a un HT Score de 96 et LasoExperience a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits