The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 110 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Lodgical Solution se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Sirvoy se distingue en matiere de customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
Notes comparees basees sur 110 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 5 | 105 |
Apres analyse de 110 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Lodgical Solution apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Sirvoy mettent en avant customer support, ease of use, gestion des réservations. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Gestion des réservations
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface utilisateur et conception
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Limitations fonctionnelles
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et adaptabilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Coût et rapport qualité-prix
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #51 2 avis | #22 36 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #55 2 avis | #48 3 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #46 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #27 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #58 2 avis | #29 21 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #52 2 avis | #37 7 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #42 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #35 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #30 5 avis | #23 16 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #13 6 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #27 0 avis |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's daily operations and guest experience. Lodgical Solution and Sirvoy aim to simplify management, but they differ markedly in reviews, features, and global reach. Lodgical Solution, with only 5 reviews, offers limited recent feedback, whereas Sirvoy boasts 95 reviews, including 32 from the last six months, making its user base and insights more current. How do these differences impact your decision?
Lodgical Solution is tailored primarily for small to mid-sized hotels and resorts, emphasizing comprehensive hotel management features such as reservation handling, guest check-ins, housekeeping, and billing. Its platform is designed by hoteliers for hoteliers, prioritizing operational efficiency and integration options; however, it lacks recent user feedback, which limits understanding of its current usability.
In contrast, Sirvoy caters to a broad range of accommodation providers, including hostels, bed & breakfasts, and boutique hotels, focusing on ease of use and affordability. Its recent reviews highlight a highly intuitive interface, excellent customer support, and strong online booking integrations, making it especially appealing for smaller properties seeking straightforward management tools.
Both systems aim to reduce administrative burdens but diverge in their regional presence and feature depth. Lodgical Solution is more limited geographically, primarily in North America, and concentrates on core hotel management. Sirvoy, with a presence in 36 countries, offers extensive integrations and channel management, which may be vital for properties with international booking needs.
Ultimately, if your hotel values a feature-rich, localized platform with existing integrations, Lodgical might seem appealing. But given Sirvoy’s recent, plentiful reviews demonstrating ease of use and global reach, it is the more reliable choice today. Are you looking for a more established, well-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a management system tailored for small to medium-sized properties with a focus on detailed operations and extensive integrations, Lodgical Solution is worth considering. Its strengths lie in features like integrated CRS, digital registration, and mobile notes & tasks, making it suitable for hotels aiming for granular control of operations.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes ease of onboarding, reliable customer support, and online booking capabilities—especially if you operate across multiple countries—Sirvoy is the better pick. Its simplified interface, robust channel management, and recent 32 reviews in the last six months prove its current relevance and user satisfaction.
For boutique hotels, hostels, or properties that want to quickly implement a system without complex setup, Sirvoy’s intuitive design is ideal. Larger hotels or those needing tailored integrations might lean toward Lodgical, but its limited recent feedback makes Sirvoy the safer, more tested option today.
Lodgical Solution scores a 4.8/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward operations. Users note that its interface minimizes tech headaches, enabling staff to quickly get up to speed on reservation, housekeeping, and billing functions—ideal for small teams.
Sirvoy, with a 4.64/5 rating, also receives high marks for usability, with recent reviews emphasizing its simplicity and quick onboarding process. Users particularly appreciate the clear navigation and helpful customer support, which reduces training time for staff unfamiliar with hotel management software.
While both systems are user-friendly, Lodgical’s slightly higher rating suggests it may have a marginal edge for hotels seeking ease of adoption. However, Sirvoy’s recent reviews confirm it is also highly accessible, especially for small teams or staff with limited technical skills.
Edge: Lodgical Solution.
Lodgical Solution offers three features unique to its platform: digital registration, integrated CRS, and mobile device notes & tasks (voice-to-text). These tools improve operational consistency and mobile management, especially useful for properties with a focus on guest check-in and front desk automation.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, provides 17 features not present in Lodgical, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, transactional emails, a calendar view, payment requests, centralized messaging, automated space optimization, ID & passport scanning, housekeeping mobile app, real-time reporting, rules-based room assignments, and a website builder. These broaden its scope, especially for properties with international guests or a need for advanced automation.
Given the higher number of unique features, Sirvoy’s feature set is more comprehensive for a variety of operational needs. If your property values diverse automation, multi-language support, and online presence, Sirvoy is the clear choice.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Lodgical Solution has a support rating of 4.6/5, with reviews indicating responsiveness and professionalism. One user noted, “Experience after a year working with Lodgical has been positive, with good support when needed,” but the limited recent feedback raises questions about current support quality.
Sirvoy outperforms with a 4.85/5 customer support rating, supported by numerous recent reviews praising quick, helpful, and friendly assistance. A typical comment states, “Support is excellent, quick, and thorough,” reflecting consistent satisfaction across recent users.
For ongoing support, Sirvoy’s higher ratings and recent positive reviews suggest it is more dependable today. If responsive support is critical, edge: Sirvoy.
Lodgical Solution integrates with 20 verified partners, including revenue management, GDS, and hospitality-specific solutions like Nonius and RateBoard. Its ecosystem covers core needs but may lack some of the broader channel management options.
Sirvoy connects with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS networks, as well as integrations with RevControl, TrustYou, and Cloudbeds. Its extensive partner list supports a wide variety of operational and marketing tools, especially for properties with diverse booking channels.
With comparable integration counts, Sirvoy’s larger global presence and partnerships give it an edge for properties needing flexible, widespread connectivity. Edge: Sirvoy.
Lodgical Solution, with only 5 reviews, currently shows no proven user ratings, making it hard to gauge overall satisfaction. Its recent reviews are nonexistent, reducing confidence in its current performance.
Sirvoy, with 95 reviews and 32 in the last six months, has a proven 94% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high satisfaction among diverse property types. Recent feedback highlights its ease of use, support, and automation, with many users describing it as a “great value” and “easy to navigate.”
Given the stronger recent feedback, Sirvoy’s ratings clearly outperform Lodgical.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Lodgical Solution does not publicly list its pricing model, suggesting it may be customized or enterprise-focused. No free trial or flat-rate options are advertised, implying a potential premium or tailored quote.
Sirvoy offers a clear pricing structure at $200 per month, with no free tier or trial detailed beyond a 30-day trial period. Its straightforward fee allows for predictable budgeting, especially attractive for small to medium-sized properties.
For transparency and ease of comparison, Sirvoy’s transparent pricing makes it more accessible. Lodgical’s pricing remains unclear, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Lodgical Solution is a comprehensive, industry-built PMS with features like integrated CRS and digital registration, but it lacks recent reviews, making current performance uncertain. Its core strength lies in operations tailored for smaller hotels, especially in North America, with a focus on affordability and simplicity.
Sirvoy, with over 95 reviews and a recent surge of positive feedback, offers a user-friendly, globally available system with extensive channel management, online booking, and excellent support. Its broad feature set and high satisfaction ratings make it the more reliable choice today.
If your hotel values proven recent performance, extensive integrations, and customer support, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Lodgical may suit properties with specific needs for industry-tailored features but should be evaluated carefully given the limited recent feedback.
In summary, for most hoteliers making a decision now, Sirvoy’s current user satisfaction, feature breadth, and international presence make it the preferable option. Lodgical might appeal for niche or specific regional needs but requires further recent validation.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Lodgical Solution et Sirvoy partagent 26 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRS intégré | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Vue Calendrier |
Affichage des principales differences. 8 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, com... Les utilisateurs soulignent l'efficacité du système dans la gestion des réservations et des profils clients. Cependant, certaines fonctionnalités, comme la possibilité de regrouper des chambres en suites ou de proposer des forfaits, sont jugées perfectibles.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien... Certains utilisateurs expriment leur mécontentement quant aux limitations des rapports de Sirvoy, notamment l'absence d'un rapport de ventes quotidien et le besoin de fonctionnalités financières et de facturation améliorées. Des retours font également état du manque d'options CRM avancées et de difficultés d'intégration des fonctionnalités de vente incitative.
Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établis... Sirvoy offre un certain degré de personnalisation, apprécié des utilisateurs qui souhaitent adapter le système aux besoins spécifiques de leur établissement. Toutefois, certains utilisateurs aimeraient une plus grande flexibilité dans la personnalisation des factures et des options de facturation dynamiques.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Cela depend de vos besoins. Lodgical Solution et Sirvoy partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Lodgical Solution propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sirvoy en propose 21. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Lodgical Solution est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Lodgical Solution : Non. Sirvoy : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Lodgical Solution a un HT Score de 0 et Sirvoy a 85. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits