The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 892 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Lodgical Solution se distingue en customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews se distingue en matiere de ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 892 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 5 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 892 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Lodgical Solution apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #51 2 avis | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #55 2 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #58 2 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #52 2 avis | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #30 5 avis | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
You’re weighing Lodgical Solution by Lodgical Solution against Mews PMS for your property management needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they differ significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Lodgical Solution is a smaller, niche-focused system with a minimal review footprint, while Mews offers a globally deployed, enterprise-ready platform supported by hundreds of reviews and recent updates. Which software is more likely to meet your hotel’s evolving needs?
Lodgical Solution promises an easy-to-use property management system suitable for smaller hotels and inns, with an emphasis on simplicity and core functionalities like reservations, billing, and housekeeping. Mews, on the other hand, provides a cloud-native platform with over 750 reviews in the last six months, demonstrating ongoing innovation and widespread adoption across diverse hotel types.
Lodgical’s reviews highlight its straightforward interface and excellent onboarding, but recent feedback shows limited updates and a small user base. Conversely, Mews frequently updates features, offers extensive third-party integrations, and garners higher customer satisfaction scores. Do you prioritize proven scale and feature breadth, or a more niche, cost-effective solution?
If your property is small, independent, or budget-conscious, Lodgical Solution’s affordability and ease of implementation make it a sensible choice. For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich system that integrates with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, Mews is the clear leader with its extensive marketplace and recent positive reviews from a wide range of hotel segments.
Lodgical suits properties that mainly require reservation handling, basic reporting, and straightforward operations. Mews appeals to mid-sized and larger properties that need automation, advanced reporting, and multiple integrations. If your hotel prioritizes growth and modern guest experiences, Mews is the more suitable option.
Lodgical Solution has an impressive average UI rating of 4.8/5 based on five reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Mews also scores high, with a 4.7/5 rating, and is praised for its modern, user-friendly design that supports remote management and easy onboarding, especially for multi-property operations.
While both systems are straightforward, Lodgical’s smaller user base and focused design often translate into a more simplified user experience. Mews’ broader feature set and marketplace might require more initial learning but ultimately support a more flexible, scalable operation. Edge: Lodgical Solution.
Lodgical Solution offers 28 shared features plus one unique feature: mobile device notes and voice-to-text tasks, focusing on core PMS functions. Mews boasts 31 exclusive features such as guest CRM, automated night audit, mobile app, kiosk check-in, and advanced analytics, supporting more complex operations and guest personalization.
Lodgical’s features are primarily geared toward small properties with simplified needs. Mews’s extensive suite of automation, guest management, and revenue features make it suitable for scalable operations. Edge: Mews.
Lodgical Solution’s support scores 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing responsive, helpful staff and a positive onboarding experience. Mews, rated at 4.27/5, is praised for its support but has some reviewers noting occasional bugs or delays, though issues are usually resolved swiftly.
Lodgical’s smaller size and dedicated focus mean more personalized support, while Mews’s global footprint provides extensive resources, including 24/7 chat and a large support team. For consistent, immediate support, Lodgical’s client feedback tilts slightly in its favor. Edge: Lodgical Solution.
Lodgical Solution integrates with 20 verified partners, including niche systems like GP Dati Hotel Service and MyForecast. Mews, however, offers 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, plus over 1,000 marketplace apps.
If integrations are crucial for your tech stack, Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers more flexibility and future-proofing. Lodgical’s narrower ecosystem might suffice for smaller, less complex properties. Edge: Mews.
Lodgical Solution has only five reviews, with an 80% likelihood of recommendation, primarily from small hotel operators. Mews has a vast review base, with a 93% recommendation rate, especially from boutique, city center, and independent hotels, and a recent review count of 98.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Mews’s higher ratings reflect broader hotel satisfaction with ongoing support and features. For contemporary, scalable solutions, Mews has the edge.
Edge: Mews.
Lodgical Solution’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting a custom or smaller-scale model. Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, making it transparent but potentially costly depending on your hotel size.
If budget transparency is a deciding factor, Mews’s clear pricing might help you evaluate ROI better. Lodgical’s costs, if any, are less transparent but likely suited for smaller properties with limited budgets.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale rapidly or requires advanced automation, extensive integrations, or guest personalization features.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with limited budgets or minimal need for integrations and automation.
In essence, Lodgical Solution is a focused, user-friendly system best suited for smaller hotels, inns, or properties with basic needs. Mews offers a more comprehensive, scalable platform that supports growth, automation, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, making it the recommended choice for most hotels aiming to stay competitive.
If your property is small and needs a straightforward solution, Lodgical might suffice. But if you’re looking to modernize, expand, and leverage a robust tech ecosystem, Mews is the smarter investment.
For properties seeking extensive features, recent positive reviews, and proven scalability, Mews stands out as the more dependable partner today.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Lodgical Solution et Mews PMS partagent 28 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Vue Calendrier |
Affichage des principales differences. 20 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Lodgical Solution et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Lodgical Solution propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Lodgical Solution est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Lodgical Solution : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Lodgical Solution a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits