The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
42 GmbH se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de 42 GmbH apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel depends on your operational needs, integration requirements, and the scale of your property. Both Matrix POS by 42 GmbH and Mews POS aim to streamline transactions, but they take very different approaches. Matrix POS is a traditional cash register system with extensive hardware connection capabilities, while Mews POS is a modern, hotel-focused platform that integrates with property management systems and enhances guest experiences. Which one best fits your hotel’s current workflow?
Matrix POS by 42 GmbH is a robust, hardware-agnostic cash register system that emphasizes flexibility through extensive integrations with various devices. It offers nearly unlimited customization options for connecting scanners, scales, printers, and other hardware, making it ideal for restaurants and foodservice venues within hotels. Conversely, Mews POS by Mews is a purpose-built hotel restaurant POS that emphasizes ease of use, real-time data, and integration with its property management system (PMS). It simplifies operations by combining POS, inventory, and online ordering into one platform.
The key divergence is their primary focus: Matrix POS caters to restaurateurs seeking maximum hardware flexibility, while Mews POS is designed for hotels seeking a unified guest experience. Both aim to improve operational efficiency but target different operational environments. Would your team benefit more from extensive hardware integrations or a hotel-focused, streamlined POS?
If your hotel operates a large restaurant or F&B outlet requiring deep hardware customization and flexibility, Matrix POS is the better choice. Its open architecture allows nearly unlimited hardware connections, supporting complex setups like scales, scanners, and customer displays, perfect for high-volume or multi-faceted food service venues.
If your hotel needs a POS that integrates tightly with your PMS, reduces manual work, and focuses on guest experience, go with Mews POS. It’s best for properties seeking a mobile, all-in-one solution that supports online ordering, real-time reporting, and smooth billing directly linked to guest profiles. Mews’ platform is especially suited for hotels aiming to automate routine tasks and improve operational transparency.
Your decision hinges on whether your priority is hardware flexibility (Matrix POS) or a purpose-built hotel solution with integrated guest management (Mews POS).
Mews POS scores an impressive 4.74 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive, modern interface and smooth onboarding process. Users report that staff can quickly learn the system, and its mobile functionality makes daily operations flexible and straightforward.
Matrix POS, on the other hand, has a rating of 0/5 for ease of use, with reviews indicating a steep learning curve, limited user-friendly features, and complex configuration processes. Its focus on hardware connections requires technical expertise, which can slow staff adoption and onboarding.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers 29 features, including PCI compliance, digital menus, inventory management, online ordering, rewards programs, and integration with third-party software such as Sage and Orange Hotel Marketing. These features support a full-service hospitality experience, helping your staff automate processes and enhance guest engagement.
Matrix POS provides no specific features listed beyond its hardware integration capabilities. Its focus is on connecting hardware to create a flexible point-of-sale environment, but it lacks the dedicated hospitality features seen in Mews POS.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts a high customer support rating of 4.43 out of 5, with reviews praising its well-designed onboarding, reliable support team, and solution-oriented assistance. Its extensive onboarding process and recent reviews underscore its responsiveness and continuous development.
Matrix POS has a zero rating for customer support, with no reviews available, making it difficult to assess its service quality. Its lack of recent reviews and customer feedback suggests limited support resources or visibility.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including major PMS, revenue management, and marketing platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Sage, and Criton. Its vast ecosystem supports a wide range of hotel and restaurant integrations, enabling comprehensive operational connectivity.
Matrix POS connects with only 5 verified partners, focusing on hardware compatibility rather than extensive software integrations. Its limited partner network restricts the ability to connect with other operational tools.
Edge: Mews POS.
While Matrix POS has no reviews or ratings, Mews has a substantial review count of 156, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels of various sizes and segments rate Mews highly, especially for its modern interface and guest-centric features.
Given the recent reviews and high NPS score of 9.32 out of 10, hoteliers clearly prefer Mews. Its latest user feedback consistently highlights its reliability and ease, making it the stronger choice.
Edge: Mews POS.
Matrix POS does not list specific pricing or a trial option, implying it may require customized quotes and potentially higher setup costs depending on hardware needs.
Mews charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no mention of setup fees or tiered pricing. Its transparent, subscription-based model offers predictable costs for hotels seeking a scalable solution.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a unified platform or minimal technical support, as Matrix POS lacks dedicated hotel management features and support ratings.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on legacy systems or requires extensive hardware customization beyond standard POS peripherals.
The core difference is their intended use: Matrix POS is a hardware-centric cash register designed for foodservice environments, while Mews POS is a hotel-focused, integrated platform that supports a seamless guest experience. If your hotel needs a flexible, hardware-agnostic POS that connects with multiple devices, Matrix POS is the choice—though support and recent reviews are unavailable to confirm ongoing performance.
If your priority is a user-friendly, hotel-specific POS that enhances operational automation, supports online ordering, and integrates deeply with your PMS, Mews POS wins decisively. Its extensive feature set, high customer satisfaction, and recent positive reviews make it the more dependable option for hotels seeking a modern, scalable POS.
For most hotels, especially those prioritizing guest experience and operational efficiency, Mews POS presents the safer, more support-backed investment. Reserve Matrix POS for specialized venues with complex hardware needs that can sustain a less supported, more technical setup.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Matrix POS et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Matrix POS et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Matrix POS propose 5 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Matrix POS : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. 42 GmbH a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits