The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Oracle Hospitality se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Oracle Hospitality mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Oracle Hospitality |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Oracle Hospitality |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Oracle Hospitality |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Oracle Hospitality |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Opera PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. While both aim to streamline management and enhance the guest experience, their strengths diverge sharply—Mews focuses on modern, flexible cloud technology with extensive integrations, whereas Opera leans on its legacy, feature-rich heritage. Given the current landscape, your decision should prioritize recent reviews, user experience, and scalability potential.
Mews’s review count and recent feedback overwhelmingly favor it, providing a more reliable gauge of current performance. Is your hotel ready for a solution that’s praised for ease of use, innovation, and a robust marketplace? Or do legacy systems with extensive features still resonate with your team’s comfort zone? Let’s explore.
Mews offers a cloud-native platform praised for its intuitive interface, automation, and fast onboarding, supported by over 759 recent reviews. Opera, despite its long-standing presence, has no recent reviews and is largely known for its comprehensive but outdated legacy features. Your team benefits from Mews’s modern design and continuous updates, while Opera may feel clunky and less adaptable to current tech trends.
Both systems aim to handle reservations, billing, and operations, but Mews’s newer architecture allows for faster integration, automation, and scalability. Opera’s complexity can hinder quick adoption, especially for smaller or mid-sized properties seeking agility. Are you prioritizing ease and speed, or legacy stability? The choice is clear.
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, cloud-based PMS with a strong focus on automation and integrations, go with Mews. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, hostels, or chains looking for flexibility and rapid deployment, especially given its 4.62/5 overall rating and recent reviews highlighting ease of use.
If you require a highly detailed, feature-rich enterprise solution with extensive customization—particularly for large, multi-property operations—Opera may still appeal, though no recent reviews are available to validate current performance. For most hotels seeking agility and modern features, Mews is the smarter pick.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by 73 recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users frequently mention how quickly staff adapt and how the system simplifies daily tasks, with testimonials like “Mews is very user-friendly and makes everything much easier.”
Opera’s usability data is unavailable, but its legacy reputation suggests a steeper learning curve and more training requirements. Its interface is reportedly outdated and less intuitive, potentially slowing staff adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payment solutions, mobile check-in, and extensive automation tools. Its marketplace offers over 1,000 integrations, enabling rapid feature expansion.
Opera lacks recent feature updates in available data, and no unique features are highlighted. While it historically offered comprehensive property management functions, it may fall short in current innovation and flexibility. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support rating of 4.27/5 reflects consistent positive feedback, with many users praising their onboarding process and support responsiveness. Review quotes like “Their support team sets new standards” highlight ongoing satisfaction.
Opera’s support data is unavailable, but legacy perception suggests support might be less proactive or modernized. Given Mews’s recent review volume and high satisfaction, support quality favors Mews. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 335 verified partners and extensive marketplace dwarf Opera’s zero publicly listed verified integrations. The ability to connect with over 1,000 third-party services—ranging from payment providers to CRM tools—is a major advantage.
Opera’s integration capabilities are not documented, implying limited or outdated options. For a hotel that values a connected tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are clearly superior. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 overall rating, based on 759 reviews with recent feedback, signals strong current user satisfaction—particularly among boutique, hostel, and mid-sized properties. Hotels across segments consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Opera’s lack of recent reviews and available rating data makes it impossible to assess current user sentiment. Its legacy status may appeal to large chains accustomed to its extensive menu, but for most modern hotels, Mews’s recent positive feedback is a decisive factor. Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a starting base price of $900 per month without a freemium or trial, and no implementation fees are listed. Pricing for Opera is not publicly available, typically requiring direct vendor engagement, often tailored for large enterprise clients.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing, smaller to midsize hotels can better evaluate ROI. Opera’s custom quotes and potential high costs make it less accessible for independent or boutique hotels.
Mews’s core advantage lies in its modern, cloud-native architecture, extensive integrations, and recent stellar reviews. Its intuitive interface and automation capabilities make it well-suited for hotels that want to improve efficiency without sacrificing guest satisfaction.
Opera remains a formidable legacy system, offering deep customization and extensive features, but its lack of recent reviews and modern updates limit its appeal to forward-thinking hotels. It’s better suited for large, established chains with complex needs and resources to manage it.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid deployment, and scalable integrations, Mews is the clear choice. For legacy stability and extensive feature sets, Opera might still have a place—though current data suggests Mews’s modern approach wins out for most properties today.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Oracle Hospitality | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Opera PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Oracle Hospitality |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Opera PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Opera PMS en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Opera PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Oracle Hospitality a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits