The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Megasys se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Megasys mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Megasys |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Mews PMS and Portfolio HMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Mews, with its vast global footprint and extensive review base, offers a proven track record, while Portfolio HMS remains less visible but may suit specific operational needs. Which platform aligns best with your hotel's scale and ambitions?
Mews PMS and Portfolio HMS serve different hotel segments and offer contrasting levels of market validation. Mews, launched in 2012 and based in the Netherlands, boasts a 99.53 score on HotelTechReport, with 758 reviews, including 98 recent ones from the last six months, giving it a strong, current reputation for reliability. Portfolio HMS, with no reviews or recent data, appears less established and lacks visible user feedback or case studies.
Mews provides a comprehensive, cloud-native platform designed for diverse property types—from boutique hotels to large chains—supporting scalability and integrations. Portfolio HMS, by contrast, advertises robust functionalities but offers no publicly available reviews or user insights to validate its claims. Do you prefer a vendor with proven customer satisfaction and ongoing support or a less documented system?
If your hotel needs a highly adaptable, scalable PMS with proven performance across multiple regions and hotel segments, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable if you prioritize extensive integrations, automation, and a modern user interface, backed by a large, active user community. Conversely, if your hotel’s needs are niche or you seek a system with potentially lower costs and fewer users, Portfolio HMS might be worth exploring, although the lack of reviews makes it hard to assess its suitability.
For hoteliers managing boutique properties, hostels, or small chains seeking a flexible cloud-based tool with proven support, Mews offers the confidence of extensive real-world validation. Larger operators looking for a mature platform with a broad partner ecosystem should favor Mews for its proven track record. If your hotel is smaller or prefers a less documented solution, Portfolio HMS might be appropriate, but the absence of reviews complicates validation.
Mews consistently earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.7 out of 5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and strong support resources. Users appreciate its modern, visual design, which reduces training time and promotes staff adoption, even across multi-property portfolios.
Portfolio HMS, with no available reviews or feedback, cannot be confidently rated on usability. Its user interface, learning curve, and onboarding experience remain unknown, creating uncertainty for your team. Based on existing data, Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a feature set exceeding 59 unique functionalities, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its open API and over 336 verified integrations enable customization and connection to a broad tech ecosystem.
Portfolio HMS’s feature list remains undisclosed, with no detailed comparison available. Without user reviews or case studies, it’s impossible to verify its capabilities or identify unique functionalities. Mews’s proven, extensive feature set provides a definitive edge.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support is rated 4.27 out of 5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, online support, and proactive onboarding. Many users remark, “Of course we've had to overcome a few barriers, but we're certain to have made the best decision in implementing Mews. Their support team sets new standards.”
Portfolio HMS offers no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Given Mews’s transparent support metrics and positive feedback, it clearly leads in customer support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts an ecosystem of 336 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, along with over 1,000 options in its Marketplace. This extensive network enables your hotel to customize workflows, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Portfolio HMS, with zero verified integrations or partner data, cannot match Mews’s ecosystem. Its limited or undisclosed integration capabilities pose risks for scalability and modern operation needs. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s user ratings are notably high: 4.62 out of 5 overall, 4.7 for ease of use, and 4.27 for customer support, based on 758 reviews, with a recent 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers praise its user-friendly design, flexibility, and continuous innovation.
In contrast, Portfolio HMS has no public reviews, ratings, or recent feedback. The absence of user data indicates less market validation and confidence. Clearly, hoteliers rate Mews higher by a large margin. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly advertised. Its transparent pricing model allows hotels to budget accordingly, though additional costs may apply for premium features.
Pricing for Portfolio HMS is not available, and the lack of a public pricing structure makes direct comparison impossible. The absence of clear costs suggests a need for direct vendor engagement, which adds uncertainty. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a comprehensive, well-established PMS backed by a large community of satisfied hoteliers. Its extensive features, proven support, and global presence make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
If your hotel needs a flexible, trusted platform with proven results and a broad ecosystem, go with Mews. It offers a clear advantage in support, integrations, and user satisfaction.
Choose Portfolio HMS only if your specific operational needs align precisely with its capabilities, and you are prepared to take on the risk of less validated technology. Its lack of reviews and support data makes it unsuitable for most hotels seeking proven reliability.
In summary, for most hoteliers aiming for a future-proof, scalable, and well-supported PMS, Mews is the definitive recommendation. It’s the choice that brings confidence, innovation, and proven success to your hotel’s management.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Megasys | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Portfolio HMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Portfolio HMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Portfolio HMS en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Portfolio HMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Megasys a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits