The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Modotel se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Modotel mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Modotel |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Modotel PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and strategic goals. Mews, with its extensive features and proven track record, addresses a broad spectrum of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, by automating core operations and offering a vast integration ecosystem. Modotel, with fewer reviews and limited market presence, lacks publicly available supporting data, making Mews the more reliable option for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
Given the significant difference in review volume, recent feedback, and overall ratings, Mews clearly dominates in performance, support, and user satisfaction. Are you ready to prioritize a platform with a proven track record, or are you considering an untested alternative?
Mews and Modotel serve the same overarching goal: streamlining hotel operations. Mews excels with a high overall rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews—98 of which are recent—indicating strong and current user confidence. In contrast, Modotel’s ratings are unavailable or unverified, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its reliability or effectiveness.
While Mews offers an array of functionalities like automated reservations, guest communications, revenue management, and over 336 verified integrations, Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed. Mews’s cloud-based approach and extensive third-party marketplace make it adaptable across diverse hotel types, whereas Modotel provides no publicly documented features or real-world performance data. Do you want your hotel’s PMS to be backed by verified reviews and proven features?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable system with a broad array of features, Mews is the clear choice. Its target segments include boutique hotels, hostels, city-center properties, and large chains, with a review count nearly 760 and recent feedback from nearly 100 users—most praising its usability, automation, and support.
If your hotel’s requirements are minimal or experimental, and you’re willing to take a risk on an unverified solution, Modotel might be worth exploring. However, without concrete reviews or documented features, it’s unlikely to match Mews’s reliability, support, or ecosystem. For hotels aiming for growth, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, smarter investment.
Mews’s UI and onboarding are highly rated, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score from 758 reviews, and a 4.39/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick setup, often remarking that staff adoption is smooth and minimal training is needed. Multiple reviews describe Mews as “user-friendly,” “thoughtful,” and “easy to navigate.”
Modotel’s user experience is undocumented in the available reviews, with no recent user feedback or ratings to assess its accessibility or ease of implementation. The absence of detailed support or onboarding data suggests that Mews has a clear advantage here. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive array of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, booking engine, integrated CRS, digital registration, automated night audit, task management, and over 336 verified integrations. These capabilities allow for deep customization and operational control.
Modotel’s feature set remains undisclosed and unverified, with no publicly documented functionalities or integrations. The lack of detailed feature data makes it impossible to compare their capabilities directly, but given Mews’s proven extensive feature list, Mews is the clear leader. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 across 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its responsive, helpful support team and quick issue resolution. Users often mention that Mews support is “supportive,” “professional,” and “available 24/7,” especially with its premium support packages.
In contrast, Modotel has no available review data or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. Without verified support feedback, Mews’s strong support reputation makes it the better choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, with 93% likelihood to recommend, reflects broad, positive sentiment from hotels of various sizes and segments, especially boutique, city-center, and hostel properties. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and support, indicating consistent satisfaction across segments.
Modotel’s absence of reviews and ratings means no comparable data exists. Based on available information, hotelier confidence strongly favors Mews. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or free trial options publicly listed. Its structured pricing indicates a mid-to-high investment, justified by extensive features and support.
Modotel’s pricing details are unavailable, with no public pricing or trial offers shared. This lack of transparency complicates comparison, but the absence of verifiable value proposition makes Mews’s pricing more predictable and justified.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal or unverified system, or are exploring a solution without documented features, reviews, or regional presence.
Not ideal if you need a reliable, well-supported system with proven features, integrations, and extensive hotel segment experience.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record of high user satisfaction and recent growth in reviews. Its extensive ecosystem, automation capabilities, and support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes committed to operational excellence.
Modotel remains an unverified contender with no available reviews or documented features, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and growth. If your hotel prioritizes stability, proven performance, and support, Mews is the clear winner.
For hotels aiming to streamline operations, improve guest experience, and scale confidently, Mews offers the most compelling, validated solution. Only consider Modotel if you’re experimenting with minimal operational needs and are prepared for an untested platform.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Modotel | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Modotel PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Modotel PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Modotel PMS en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Modotel PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Modotel a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits