The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Guestnet se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
moonshiner se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 165 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 165 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 165 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Guestnet apprecient surtout user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, expérience client positive, tandis que ceux de moonshiner mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
moonshiner |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
Expérience client positive
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
Intégration avec des systèmes externes
▾
|
|
|
−
Notifications push et alertes
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
moonshiner |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 56 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #2 85 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 2 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #23 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
moonshiner |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 66 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #7 18 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
moonshiner |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 3 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and Moonshiner by Moonshiner hinges on your hotel’s digital guest engagement needs, system compatibility, and operational priorities. Guestnet offers a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive reviews, while Moonshiner’s presence is virtually unverified via reviews and lacks recent user feedback. Both aim to improve guest communication, but their capabilities and proven track records differ significantly.
Guestnet’s comprehensive suite and proven industry presence make it the safer, more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a trusted digital guest app. Moonshiner, on the other hand, remains untested in the market with no available reviews, making it a risky investment unless you’re willing to experiment.
Guestnet by Guestnet is the clear leader, with over 150 recent reviews, a high satisfaction rating, and an impressive set of features. It scores 96.36 in the HotelTechReport (HTR) score, with a 4.74/5 ease of use rating and a 4.82/5 customer support rating, reflecting high user confidence. Moonshiner shows no reviews or market validation, making it impossible to assess its usefulness or reliability.
Given its extensive recent feedback, proven integration capabilities, and regional presence, Guestnet offers a more dependable solution for your hotel’s guest engagement and operational needs.
Guestnet solves the problem of fragmented guest communication and operational inefficiencies by offering a fully integrated, customizable guest app. Moonshiner claims to address similar needs but provides no verifiable data or recent user reviews to confirm effectiveness.
Guestnet’s feature set is detailed and proven, with 12 unique features like request management, mobile check-in, and multi-lingual support, which are absent from Moonshiner. Meanwhile, Moonshiner’s lack of verified integrations, features, or regional presence raises questions about its capability.
Guestnet’s strong focus on integrations, ease of use, and ongoing development make it the safer choice. Moonshiner’s absence of tangible proof suggests it may be unready or unsuitable for serious hotel operations. Are you comfortable risking your investment on an unproven platform?
If your hotel needs a platform that delivers immediate, proven value with extensive reviews and real-world examples, go with Guestnet. It is ideal for properties seeking a reliable guest app that integrates with existing systems, improves communication, and boosts revenue. Guestnet’s diverse user base includes luxury hotels, resorts, and boutique establishments, supported by recent positive reviews.
If your hotel has minimal digital guest communication needs or prefers to test new, untested solutions without a clear track record, Moonshiner might seem appealing. However, with no reviews or market evidence, it’s unlikely to provide the stability or features you require for daily operations. Its lack of integrations and proven case studies makes it a risky choice.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, deep integrations, and proven satisfaction, Guestnet is the clear winner. Moonshiner’s market absence and zero reviews put it at a significant disadvantage.
Guestnet earns a 4.74/5 rating for ease of use, praised for its intuitive, user-friendly interface that staff and guests find straightforward. The onboarding process is rated 4.66/5, with many reviews highlighting quick adoption and minimal training requirements.
Moonshiner’s usability remains unverified—no reviews or ratings are available to assess its interface or onboarding experience. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine if Moonshiner is easy or complex to implement.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet offers 12 features exclusive to its platform, including request management, room service ordering, mobile check-in/out, guest profiles, local recommendations, multilingual support, and digital messaging. These features directly address core guest engagement needs and operational efficiency.
Moonshiner provides no verified features or functionalities, making it impossible to compare. The absence of documented features suggests it may lack the depth or sophistication needed for modern hotel operations.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s customer support is highly rated at 4.82/5, with reviews praising its availability, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Hoteliers mention that support helps streamline operations, solve issues quickly, and improve overall satisfaction.
Moonshiner has no available reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality entirely unknown. This lack of user feedback makes Guestnet the clearly superior choice for reliable support.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet boasts 20 verified partner integrations, including major property management systems and third-party services like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit. These integrations enable seamless workflows and enhance operational efficiency.
Moonshiner has no verified integrations or partnership data available, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. This significantly hampers its practicality for hotels looking for an integrated digital guest experience.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a 4.48/5 score for value. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and resort properties, frequently commend its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Moonshiner has no reviews or ratings to assess hotel satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it cannot be considered a validated solution.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees, making it transparent and predictable. Details about Moonshiner’s costs are unavailable, indicating a lack of clear pricing information.
Given the proven value and detailed pricing structure, Guestnet’s cost is justified by its extensive features and support, which Moonshiner cannot match without transparent pricing.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal digital presence or have very limited technological resources.
Not ideal if you require reliable, fully supported digital guest engagement tools with proven industry track records.
Guestnet by Guestnet is a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven results. Its 20 verified integrations, positive hotel feedback, and regional presence confirm its reliability and suitability for most property types.
Moonshiner remains an untested, unreviewed solution lacking market validation or clear feature sets. Unless your hotel operates in a niche willing to risk unverified software, Guestnet is the recommended choice for a dependable digital guest experience.
In summary, if you want a platform backed by recent reviews and a broad feature set, Guestnet stands out as the safer, more effective option. Moonshiner’s complete absence of reviews and market presence makes it difficult to justify over the established, trusted solution.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
moonshiner | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Guestnet et Moonshiner partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
moonshiner |
|---|---|---|
| Annuaire des hôtels | ||
| Application Web | ||
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Gestion des demandes | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Recommandations locales |
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit... De nombreux clients font état d'une satisfaction accrue grâce à l'accès rapide aux services et équipements de l'hôtel via Guestnet, ce qui se traduit par des commentaires positifs et potentiellement une augmentation des visites de retour.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains exp... Les utilisateurs apprécient l'intégration de Guestnet avec les données touristiques locales et les systèmes de gestion hôtelière, même si certains expriment le souhait d'une intégration plus poussée afin d'améliorer l'automatisation et de réduire les tâches manuelles.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Guestnet et Moonshiner partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Guestnet propose 20 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Moonshiner en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Guestnet est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Guestnet : Non. Moonshiner : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Guestnet a un HT Score de 96 et moonshiner a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits