The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
p3 Hotels se distingue en onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Confirmation emails and Referral Reporting.
eRevMax se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 16 | 20 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Moteur de réservation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #36 3 avis | #34 4 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #35 5 avis | #30 10 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #20 6 avis | #25 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #20 2 avis | #19 2 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #35 9 avis | #31 11 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #36 4 avis | #27 11 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #24 9 avis | #33 3 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #31 3 avis | #29 3 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #28 1 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #17 14 avis | #42 0 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #19 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #4 10 avis |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel’s revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. You are evaluating p3 Booking Engine by p3 Hotels and RateTiger Booking Engine by eRevMax, both designed to optimize online bookings and channel management. While both address core booking needs, they differ in features, user experience, and market presence. Your goal is to select a solution that aligns with your property’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions—so which one really stands out?
Both p3 Hotels and eRevMax offer solutions aimed at increasing direct bookings and simplifying channel management. p3 Booking Engine emphasizes conversion optimization and customization, with features like Google Hotel Ads, TripAdvisor integration, and tailored modules for weddings and corporate bookings. RateTiger, on the other hand, focuses heavily on distribution and rate synchronization, supporting a broad range of channels and ancillary revenue options.
The core difference? p3’s platform is built to deliver a high-converting, user-centric experience with advanced marketing integrations, whereas RateTiger excels in channel connectivity, especially for hotels with complex multichannel distribution needs. Given this, your choice hinges on whether you prioritize booking conversion or channel reach—are you looking to boost direct bookings or maximize distribution?
If your hotel aims to increase direct revenue through a simplified, engaging booking process, go with p3 Booking Engine. Its 16 recent reviews and high overall rating (4.67/5) reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among independent and resort hotels, with a focus on conversion and ease of use.
If your team needs a robust distribution platform with extensive partner integrations and channel synchronization, RateTiger is the better fit. Despite a lower overall rating (0/5 in overall ratings, but with 17 reviews), its reputation for channel management and global reach—especially in larger, multi-channel hotels—makes it advantageous for distribution-heavy properties.
p3’s interface is rated 4.5/5, with a smooth onboarding process that recent reviews highlight as exceptionally user-friendly. Hotels praise its intuitive design, flexible customization, and straightforward setup, making staff adoption easier even for smaller teams.
RateTiger’s interface scores slightly lower at 4.29/5, with some users mentioning the interface is easy but that managing multiple channels can become complex. The onboarding is solid but may require more time due to the broader scope of distribution features.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels offers 21 features exclusive to its platform, including wedding and corporate modules, conversion reports, GDPR compliance, and multiple payment options like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. It also provides Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor integrations, tailored to enhance direct booking and marketing efforts.
RateTiger provides 23 shared features with p3 but lacks the specialized modules and integrations that p3 offers. Its features focus on rate and availability management, promo codes, and multi-language support, but it does not include unique modules like GDPR compliance or booking-specific add-ons.
Conclusion: p3’s broader feature set offers a more tailored experience for hotels seeking customization and marketing tools.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels scores 4.59/5 in customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, friendly staff, and ongoing communication about product updates. Customers report a proactive approach, with some noting the absence of negatives and high satisfaction with the relationship.
RateTiger’s support is rated 4.47/5, with reviews highlighting prompt responses, effective resolution, and helpful training. However, some users mention that virtual training could be improved with in-person sessions for more clarity.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
eRevMax’s RateTiger boasts 70 verified partners, with key integrations including forSight, Quinta, Triptease, and many global distribution systems. Its extensive partner network makes it well-suited for hotels that rely on diverse channels and complex distribution.
p3 Hotels has 13 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Triptease, and Adyen, with a focus on high-quality, strategic integrations tailored to hotel operations. While fewer in number, p3’s integrations are often more specialized, such as Google Analytics, Facebook conversion tracking, and TripAdvisor.
Conclusion: RateTiger’s broader partner network benefits large, multi-channel hotels, but p3’s targeted, high-quality integrations serve smaller or boutique properties effectively.
Edge: RateTiger.
p3 Hotels has a higher rating (4.67/5) based on 16 recent reviews, with property types including independent, resort, and branded hotels. Reviewers praise its user experience, conversion improvements, and ongoing product enhancements.
eRevMax’s RateTiger, with 17 reviews, has a lower overall rating, and many reviews focus on channel management rather than booking engine specifics. While appreciated for its distribution capabilities, it receives less high praise for ease of use or customer service.
Conclusion: p3’s recent reviews and ratings clearly demonstrate stronger hoteliers’ satisfaction.
Edge: p3 Hotels.
p3 Hotels charges a base price of $500 per month, with no implementation fees or freemium options. This transparent pricing includes the core platform and any included modules.
eRevMax’s RateTiger does not publicly list prices, making it necessary to request a quote. Its flexible, custom pricing model depends on the hotel’s size and distribution needs, which can lead to varied costs.
Conclusion: p3 offers a straightforward, predictable pricing structure, while RateTiger’s costs are variable and require direct inquiry.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
p3 Booking Engine is a high-quality, customizable platform designed to enhance direct bookings and improve the guest booking experience. Its feature-rich, user-friendly interface attracts hotels focused on conversion and marketing, especially independent and resort properties.
RateTiger excels in distribution, offering extensive partner integrations and channel management for larger, multi-channel hotels. Its broad global reach and proven track record make it ideal for hotels that rely heavily on multiple distribution channels.
If your priority is increasing direct bookings with a tailored experience, p3 is the better choice. For broader distribution management, especially across many channels and markets, RateTiger remains the preferred option.
Ultimately, the decision depends on whether your goal is to maximize direct revenue or streamline extensive channel distribution. Each product has its strengths, but based on recent reviews and overall ratings, p3 Hotels stands out as the more highly-rated booking engine for hoteliers seeking a user-centric, conversion-boosting solution.
La tarification des Moteur de réservation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) et RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) partagent 23 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Comparaisons de forfaits tarifaires | ||
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Dates flexibles | ||
| Modaux d'intention de sortie personnalisables | ||
| Modules de réservation de mariage et d'entreprise | ||
| Remplissage automatique du formulaire |
Affichage des principales differences. 9 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 2 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) et RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Booking Engine de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) propose 13 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) en propose 70. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.5/5 contre 4.4/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) : Non. RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Booking Engine proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. p3 Hotels a un HT Score de 0 et eRevMax a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits