The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support .
Shiji Group se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments and Recurring Payments.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 23 | 0 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 6 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 7 avis | #9 0 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #4 1 avis | #5 0 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #4 0 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 7 avis | #7 0 avis |
| Luxe | #5 0 avis | #6 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #4 1 avis | #6 0 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #4 0 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #4 14 avis | #7 0 avis |
| Europe | #5 0 avis | #8 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #3 0 avis | — |
Choosing between roommaster Payments by roommaster and Shiji Astral Payments by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both promise to streamline payment processes, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market reach. Your team needs a solution that not only fits your operational model but also offers reliable support and integrations. So, which payment platform is the better fit for your hotel?
Both products aim to improve transaction efficiency, reduce manual work, and handle complex payment scenarios. However, roommaster Payments is more focused on integrating directly within PMS systems, especially for North American markets, whereas Shiji Astral Payments emphasizes broad payment method support and global scalability. Do you prioritize regional reliability or international features?
roommaster Payments is designed primarily for hotels that want a straightforward, integrated payment solution within their existing PMS environment. Its strength lies in automating deposits, pre-authorizations, and reconciliation, especially for properties in North America and regions where it has established its presence. The reviews highlight solid ease of use and strong customer support, but recent user feedback criticizes stability issues and system errors, especially after recent cloud platform upgrades.
Conversely, Shiji Astral Payments offers a broader set of features, supporting multiple currencies, a wide range of payment methods (including Apple Pay, Google Pay, Alipay, WeChatPay), and comprehensive security protocols. It is a cloud-native platform, ideal for hotels seeking global reach and multiple payment channels. However, it lacks user reviews, making it harder to gauge real-world performance and support quality. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-implement solution with proven support in North America and a focus on simplifying payment workflows within a PMS, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 reviews, mostly recent, and high support ratings (4.45/5) demonstrate strong user satisfaction in stability and support.
If your hotel operates across multiple regions, handles numerous currencies, and requires a diverse array of payment methods, Shiji Astral Payments is the better choice. Its extensive feature set—supporting over a dozen payment types and integrations with POS systems—makes it suitable for larger, international properties. However, the lack of user reviews indicates a need for careful evaluation before deployment.
roommaster Payments boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, supported by reviews praising its straightforward interface and simple onboarding process. Users report that staff can adapt quickly, and the system integrates well with the PMS, streamlining daily operations. However, recent reviews mention stability issues and system outages that hinder usability.
Shiji Astral Payments, being cloud-based, typically offers a modern interface with intuitive features, but no user reviews are available to confirm this. Its extensive payment method support might introduce complexity, especially during initial setup, which could impact staff adoption. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 15 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, dynamic currency conversion, and acceptance of diverse payment methods like AliPay, WeChatPay, and Apple Pay. Its integrations with POS and PMS systems further extend its capabilities, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive flexibility.
roommaster Payments offers 13 shared features, focusing on core payment functions such as deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management. It does not support as many payment methods or currencies but excels in automating reconciliation and reducing manual effort within PMS environments. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments benefits from a support rating of 4.45/5, with reviews frequently praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Users report that support technicians are knowledgeable and available, often resolving issues quickly. However, some recent feedback indicates system outages and stability concerns that complicate support interactions.
Shiji Astral Payments, lacking review data, makes it difficult to assess support quality. Given its global scale, it likely offers 24/7 support; yet, without user feedback, hotel teams should proceed cautiously, especially during initial implementation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major vendors like Sage, GuestCentric, and Revinate. Its integrations focus on PMS, revenue management, and distribution channels, enabling a cohesive workflow for many North American hotels.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 64 verified partners, including popular systems like Oaky, Adyen, and SALTO. Its broader partner network reflects its aim to serve international markets with diverse needs. Both systems are well-connected, but Shiji’s wider partner ecosystem offers slightly more flexibility for varied hotel operations. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments has accumulated 20 reviews in the last six months, with a high overall rating of 4.45/5 and an NPS score of 8.4/10, indicating strong recent satisfaction. Hoteliers in North America rate it highly for support and ease of use, despite some concerns about stability.
Shiji Astral Payments has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its international footprint and feature set are promising, but without recent feedback, hoteliers should approach cautiously. Therefore, edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments is priced at a flat $300 monthly fee, with no free trial or tiered pricing structures publicly available. Its cost is straightforward, but some users feel it is high given recent stability issues.
Shiji Astral Payments charges a base price of $200 per month, with no trial info provided. Its pricing suggests a more flexible or scalable model, likely reflecting its extensive features. Without detailed rates, your team should request customized quotes based on your hotel’s transaction volume and regional needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs a wide array of payment methods, as the platform’s international features are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely within North America with simple payment processing needs, as the platform’s extensive features may be unnecessary and more complex.
In essence, the core difference lies in the focus: roommaster Payments offers a reliable, North America-centric payment solution with high support ratings, while Shiji Astral Payments provides a versatile, globally oriented platform with extensive payment method options.
Choose roommaster Payments if your hotel values proven support, ease of use, and seamless PMS integration within North America, especially if stability is your priority. Opt for Shiji Astral Payments if your hotel operates internationally, needs multiple currencies, and wants a broad array of payment options—despite the lack of recent user reviews.
If your hotel prioritizes regional stability and support, roommaster Payments should be your go-to. However, if your operation demands flexibility, currency support, and global scalability, Shiji Astral Payments might be the better long-term investment.
In conclusion:
Your decision should reflect your operational landscape, regional needs, and support expectations.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, roommaster Payments et Shiji Astral Payments partagent 13 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte AliPay | ||
| Accepte American Express | ||
| Accepte Mastercard | ||
| Accepte Paypal | ||
| Conversion de devise dynamique (DCC) | ||
| Règlements multidevises |
Affichage des principales differences. 3 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 3 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Having a single PMS across our properties has allowed us to standardize operations while maintaining flexibility for individual hotel needs. This has significantly simplified train..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. roommaster Payments et Shiji Astral Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. roommaster Payments propose 56 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Shiji Astral Payments en propose 64. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
roommaster Payments : Non. Shiji Astral Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. roommaster a un HT Score de 0 et Shiji Group a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits