The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
SS&C se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de SS&C mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and TimeShareWare by SS&C hinges on your hotel’s unique operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews specializes in modern, cloud-based property management for diverse accommodation types, emphasizing automation, guest experience, and third-party integrations. Conversely, TimeShareWare targets resort and shared-ownership management, with a focus on detailed asset oversight, financial management, and multi-site operations for larger or specialized property portfolios. So, which system aligns better with your hotel's strategic goals?
Mews and SS&C serve different hospitality niches, with Mews primarily designed for hotels, hostels, and boutique properties seeking streamlined operations and enhanced guest experiences. SS&C’s platform is tailored for larger resorts, timeshare operators, and property managers prioritizing complex financial management and multi-location oversight. While Mews offers over 1,000 integrations, SS&C emphasizes detailed asset and lease management. Do your operational challenges lean more toward guest service automation or comprehensive asset oversight?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native PMS that simplifies reservations, automates check-ins, and improves guest communication, go with Mews. Its user-friendly interface, recent surge in positive reviews, and broad regional presence (covering 54 countries) make it suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains. If your property operates multiple resorts, manages extensive lease portfolios, or requires detailed financial and asset management across sites, SS&C’s TimeShareWare offers robust tools tailored for complex, multi-site resort management. For smaller hotels seeking modern guest-centric features, Mews is the clear choice; for large, multi-resort portfolios, SS&C’s solution may be better suited.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating backed by 758 recent reviews, with users emphasizing its intuitive, modern interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Many reviewers highlight how staff adopt Mews rapidly, praising its sleek design and straightforward workflows. In contrast, SS&C’s platform has no publicly available usability ratings, and its complexity suggests a steeper learning curve, especially for smaller hotels or teams unfamiliar with enterprise-level software. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite of 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, mobile app, automated night audit, and dynamic revenue management. It also includes innovative tools like digital registration, guest messaging, and real-time reporting. SS&C’s solution centers on lease and financial management, with a focus on accounting, lease tracking, and asset oversight but fewer guest-focused features. For functionalities that enhance guest experiences and operational agility, Mews holds the advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support team is generally rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising their quick response times and proactive assistance, although some users mention occasional bugs. Many describe the support as responsive and helpful during onboarding and troubleshooting. SS&C’s customer support details are less transparent; with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s difficult to assess their responsiveness. Given Mews’s active review base and high support ratings, it’s the more reliable choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, with common integrations like Whistle, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization and automation. Its open API and Marketplace facilitate connecting with revenue management, POS, and other third-party tools. SS&C’s platform has only a single verified partner, limiting its ecosystem flexibility. For hotels seeking a highly connected system that adapts to diverse operational needs, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 is supported by 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers across boutique, city center, and hostel segments praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Smaller and independent properties especially rate it highly for streamlining daily operations and enhancing guest satisfaction. SS&C has no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Based on current data, Mews’s reputation is significantly stronger. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 monthly, with no free tier or trial, and charges for implementation and setup are included in the base fee. SS&C does not publicly disclose pricing; typically, enterprise solutions like theirs involve custom quotes based on property size and scope. Overall, Mews provides transparent pricing, which is accessible for small and mid-sized hotels. SS&C’s costs likely target larger organizations with complex needs but lack transparency for smaller hoteliers.
Mews offers a modern, user-friendly platform that excels in automating guest experiences, integrating with third-party tools, and supporting diverse accommodation types. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a clear leader for small to mid-sized hotels seeking operational agility and guest satisfaction. SS&C’s platform is targeted toward larger resorts or property management firms needing detailed financial and asset management but comes with less transparency and a steeper learning curve.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid deployment, and a broad ecosystem, choose Mews. Its proven track record across multiple segments and regions makes it the safer, more adaptable choice. However, if you operate a large resort or resort portfolio requiring intricate lease and financial management, SS&C may better meet your strategic needs—though at the cost of simplicity and flexibility for daily hotel operations.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a reliable, scalable, and modern PMS, Mews is the stronger choice. It’s built to serve the evolving needs of today’s hospitality landscape with proven reviews and recent updates that support your team’s growth and guest satisfaction.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et TimeShareWare partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et TimeShareWare partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que TimeShareWare en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. TimeShareWare : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 99 et SS&C a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits