The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and TTLock hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and guest experience goals. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, provides a comprehensive property management system designed to streamline operations from booking to check-out, while TTLock specializes in access control solutions, primarily focusing on smart lock technology with no recent reviews or ratings. How do these tools align with your hotel’s priorities?
Mews's extensive feature set and proven market presence make it a clear leader for hotels seeking an all-in-one PMS. TTLock’s narrow focus on keyless entry and access solutions may suit properties prioritizing smart lock integration but lacks the broader hotel management functionalities you likely need.
Mews PMS functions as a full-scale property management platform, supporting reservations, billing, guest communications, housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations. TTLock, on the other hand, zeroes in on electronic lock solutions, offering mobile access, key management, and access control hardware, but without integrated PMS features.
Given Mews's 99.5+ score backed by 98 recent reviews—many emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support—it’s clear that Mews is the more mature, broadly adopted solution. In contrast, TTLock’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, making it difficult to assess its suitability or reliability. Which solution best addresses your need for operational efficiency?
If your hotel requires a fully integrated PMS that automates reservations, billing, guest management, and reporting, go with Mews. Its extensive feature library—including multi-lingual support, revenue management, and online check-in—makes it ideal for modern, scalable hotels seeking operational clarity.
If your primary goal is to implement smart lock access control for guest rooms or facilities, TTLock might be appealing, especially if you already have a dedicated PMS. However, with no recent reviews or market data, TTLock’s reliability and support are uncertain, and it should be considered only as a hardware accessory rather than a management system.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by detailed onboarding and a user-friendly interface that many reviews praise for requiring minimal staff training. Its cloud-native design allows staff to manage operations remotely, with an intuitive dashboard that simplifies complex workflows.
TTLock’s user experience remains undocumented in recent reviews, and its hardware-centric approach typically involves separate management apps and devices. Without substantial user feedback, it's safe to say Mews offers a more straightforward, well-supported user journey.
Edge: Mews
Mews boasts over 59 exclusive features, including multi-currency support, a booking engine, guest CRM, integrated revenue management, automated night audit, and a mobile app—all designed to cover every aspect of hotel management in one platform. Its extensive integrations—over 336 verified partners—support a highly customizable tech ecosystem.
TTLock’s features are limited to electronic lock management—smart key issuance, remote access, and hardware controls—lacking the broad operational functionalities needed by hotels. With no comparable feature count or recent active development, Mews clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Mews
Mews support scores 4.27/5, with many recent reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and a positive onboarding experience. Users appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
TTLock’s support record is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to assess the quality of customer service or technical support. Given the complexity of hotel operations, reliable support is critical—favoring Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, revenue tools, and more—enabling a seamless, connected tech environment tailored to hotel needs. TTLock offers hardware and app integrations focused solely on access control, with only one verified partner, limiting its ecosystem.
For hotels seeking a flexible and expandable platform, Mews’s extensive integrations make it the superior choice. TTLock’s narrow scope doesn’t address broader operational requirements.
Edge: Mews
With 98 recent reviews and an overall score of 4.62/5, hoteliers consistently praise Mews for its ease of use, automation capabilities, and support. Many mention significant time savings, better guest experiences, and a high level of customization.
TTLock has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction. The absence of feedback indicates a lack of proven, real-world hotel adoption—favoring Mews’s established reputation.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers a straightforward pricing model starting at $900/month, with no implementation or hidden fees, making cost transparency easier to evaluate. TTLock’s pricing is not publicly available, and since it’s primarily hardware-focused, cost depends on lock hardware and integration setup—often requiring separate investments.
For hotels seeking predictable expenses and clear value, Mews’s transparent pricing stands out. TTLock’s costs are less transparent and hardware-dependent, which can complicate budgeting.
Mews’s core distinction lies in being a full-featured property management system trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with a proven track record of enhancing operational efficiency. TTLock focuses exclusively on smart lock hardware and access control, lacking the breadth needed for comprehensive hotel management.
If your hotel needs a single platform to manage reservations, billing, guest communications, and revenue, Mews is the clear choice. TTLock is suited only for properties seeking advanced keyless entry solutions without a broader management system.
Choose Mews when you value operational integration, automation, and proven support—especially since it commands a much larger share of recent reviews and user satisfaction. Opt for TTLock only if smart access control is your sole focus and your management system is handled elsewhere.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating property management solutions, Mews offers a complete, well-supported, and highly rated platform, making it the recommended choice over TTLock’s niche hardware solutions.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et TTLock partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et TTLock partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que TTLock en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. TTLock : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits