The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
CMSol se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de CMSol mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Visual Hotel hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and growth plans. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent user experiences, emerges as the more reliable choice for scalability and proven functionality. Visual Hotel promises streamlined operations and AI-driven insights but lacks the broad user base and recent feedback to match Mews’ track record.
Both aim to optimize your hotel’s workflows—from reservations to guest communication—but only one offers the proven longevity, extensive integrations, and hotelier trust needed for long-term success. Are you ready to invest in a platform with a strong industry reputation?
Mews, with its 758 reviews and a rating of 4.62/5, is the most reviewed PMS in this comparison, reflecting a broad and current user base. Visual Hotel, founded only in 2022, has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess reliability or user satisfaction.
Mews’s recent reviews highlight ease of use, robust automation, and extensive integrations, whereas Visual Hotel’s promise lies in AI-powered insights and simplified workflows. Do you prioritize proven reliability or innovative AI features?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported PMS with thousands of integrations, go with Mews. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes seeking a scalable solution, especially those desiring deep automation and extensive third-party connections.
If your hotel is an early-stage property or boutique operation focusing on AI-driven insights and simplified processes, Visual Hotel might appeal. However, without recent reviews or proven market presence, Mews’s established track record makes it the safer choice for growth and operational stability.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers comment on how staff adoption is smooth, with many citing how the platform reduces daily workload.
Visual Hotel, founded in 2022, has no publicly available user ratings or reviews, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to confirm whether it simplifies operations effectively.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, a revenue management module, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and extensive automation tools. Its features cover a broad spectrum, from housekeeping modules to real-time reporting, making it highly adaptable.
Visual Hotel emphasizes AI-driven guest insights and operational summaries but lacks publicly available details about specific features or integrations. Its technology focus may provide innovative insights but falls short of Mews’s comprehensive, proven feature set.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains an overall support rating of 4.27/5, with users highlighting responsive, helpful support, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Recent reviews praise Mews for quick bug resolution and attentive customer service.
Visual Hotel, being a newer entrant with no accessible reviews or support ratings, offers no verified feedback. Without documented support experiences, Mews’s support reliability clearly leads.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ecosystem includes 336 verified partners, with integrations spanning channel managers, payment systems, CRS, and more. Its open API and marketplace host over 1,000 third-party apps, enabling extensive customization and operational flexibility.
Visual Hotel has no publicly listed integrations or partner count, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems or third-party tools. For hotels seeking a connected, adaptable tech stack, Mews’s extensive integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 758 reviews and recent ratings reflect a high satisfaction level across various hotel segments, especially boutique hotels and independents, with an average rating of 4.62/5. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, automation, and support.
Visual Hotel’s lack of reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, Mews’s proven reputation offers more confidence in delivering value.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month for its base package, with no implementation or hidden fees, offering clarity for budget planning. Visual Hotel’s pricing details are unavailable, likely because it’s a newer or less established product.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing model and proven ROI, it provides a clear value proposition. The absence of pricing details for Visual Hotel makes it difficult to assess its affordability or value.
Not ideal if you’re a very small property with minimal tech needs or prefer a system built around AI insights without extensive integrations.
Not ideal if you require proven reliability, extensive integrations, or support from a large ecosystem.
Mews is a mature, well-reviewed PMS trusted by hundreds of hoteliers across the globe, offering a comprehensive suite of features, integrations, and support. Its recent reviews underscore its usability, automation, and adaptability, making it ideal for hotels aiming for operational excellence and scalability.
Visual Hotel promises AI-powered summaries and simplified workflows but lacks the proven track record, recent reviews, and extensive integrations that give Mews its edge. If your hotel values reliability, proven support, and a broad ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice.
For hotels focused on innovative AI insights and minimal complexity, Visual Hotel might appeal—but only if you’re comfortable navigating untested waters. Ultimately, Mews’s industry trust and recent user experiences make it the safer, more effective long-term investment.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Visual Hotel partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Visual Hotel partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Hotel en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Visual Hotel : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et CMSol a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits