protel PMS (by Planet) vs. SkyTouch Technology:
Qual è Quello Giusto per Te?

Is protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology Better for Hotels?

protel PMS and SkyTouch Technology both address the core challenge of managing reservations, guest services, and operational workflows, but they diverge in scope and target properties. protel PMS offers a broad, deeply integrated platform with over 1,200 hospitality integrations and multi-currency, multi-lingual support, fitting hotels that seek a scalable all-in-one system with on-premise or cloud options. SkyTouch Technology delivers a simpler, cloud-native experience emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and foundational PMS features enhanced by 33 verified integrations, targeting small to mid-sized hotels prioritizing straightforward operations.

Both products solve fundamental property management needs: reservations, rate management, guest communications, and reporting. However, protel’s extensive feature set supports complex workflows and multi-property environments, while SkyTouch focuses on user-friendly design and remote accessibility. The choice hinges on whether a property requires protel’s comprehensive functionality and integration ecosystem or SkyTouch’s agility and simplicity.

protel PMS (by Planet) vs SkyTouch Technology: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If you operate a mid-sized or larger hotel, multi-property group, or a resort needing multi-currency and integrated payments, protel PMS is the better choice based on its 196 verified integrations and robust feature set including GDPR compliance, integrated payment terminals, and native email marketing. This is supported by 128 reviews, 20 recent in the last six months, maintaining a consistent 4.0/5 rating, indicating stability and ongoing satisfaction.

If you run a smaller independent hotel, motel, or limited-service property in North America, SkyTouch’s 4.4/5 overall rating from 123 reviews and 4.7/5 ease of use score makes it attractive for teams valuing fast onboarding and simple, cloud-based access. The lack of recent reviews suggests some caution, but its customers praise its intuitive interface and rate management capabilities suited for straightforward operations.

For boutique hotels, protel’s extensive customization and multi-language support suit international clientele, while SkyTouch’s ease appeals to properties with high staff turnover or minimal IT resources. Data on multi-property management favors protel; SkyTouch reviews cite limitations managing groups and complex reservations.

Is protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology Easier to Use?

SkyTouch Technology rates higher for ease of use (4.7/5) and onboarding (4.4/5) compared to protel’s 4.2/5 and 3.8/5 respectively, based on over 100 reviews each. Reviewers highlight SkyTouch’s straightforward, intuitive interface that reduces training times significantly, a benefit for front-desk staff and managers who onboard frequently.

By contrast, protel’s interface is functional but older in design and sometimes complicated by advanced customization options and frequent updates. Reviewers praise protel Air’s user-friendliness but note occasional system crashes and a steeper learning curve for complex configurations. Thus, SkyTouch’s simplicity supports daily operations smoothly, whereas protel demands more training but offers deeper control.

Edge: SkyTouch Technology.

Which Has Better Features: protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology?

protel PMS leads with 23 unique features not available in SkyTouch Technology, including on-premise deployment, multi-currency and multi-lingual capabilities, integrated ID and passport scanning, gift vouchers, guest CRM, GDPR compliance, native email marketing, and integrated payment terminals. These features enable hotels to automate check-in, streamline billing, optimize room assignments, and comply with data regulations, benefiting hotels with complex operations and diverse guest profiles.

SkyTouch Technology uniquely offers channel manager integration, automated night audit, EPoS, and tablet/kiosk check-in. These simplify distribution, accounting, and self-service check-in workflows but cover fewer operational areas overall.

The 23 shared features provide core PMS functions like reservations, housekeeping, and reporting. protel’s larger feature set supports broader property types and operational complexity, while SkyTouch suits simpler setups.

Edge: protel PMS (by Planet).

Which Has Better Customer Support: protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology?

SkyTouch Technology scores higher in customer support (4.5/5) and onboarding (4.4/5) versus protel’s 4.0/5 and 3.8/5. Reviewers of SkyTouch commend fast, professional assistance and helpful implementation support, though some mention lingering unresolved bugs.

protel users find support competent but report slower response times and difficulty reaching phone support, especially after acquisition by Planet. One reviewer called Protel’s support “the worst technical support” faced, impacting operations during the pandemic.

Given the volume of reviews and consistency, SkyTouch offers more reliable support experiences currently.

Edge: SkyTouch Technology.

Which Has More Integrations: protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology?

protel PMS offers 196 verified integrations, over five times SkyTouch Technology’s 33. Both share 17 key partners including SiteMinder, Cendyn, Oracle Hospitality, and Revinate, covering channel management, CRM, and revenue management essentials.

protel uniquely integrates with Innspire, Right Revenue, Omnibees, and Profitroom, providing advanced revenue optimization and guest experience tools. SkyTouch’s unique integrations include Chargerback Lost & Found, Visual Matrix PMS, and HelloShift, focusing on guest engagement and property management adjuncts.

Hotels requiring extensive third-party connectivity, especially global chains or resorts, benefit from protel’s ecosystem. Smaller properties or those focused on core systems may find SkyTouch’s integrations sufficient.

Edge: protel PMS (by Planet).

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: protel PMS (by Planet) or SkyTouch Technology?

SkyTouch Technology holds a higher overall rating (4.4/5) compared to protel’s 4.0/5, with both having over 120 reviews. However, SkyTouch has no reviews in the last six months, whereas protel has 20 recent reviews maintaining its 4.0 rating, indicating protel’s more current feedback.

Segment ratings show SkyTouch excels with motels (4.6/5, 27 reviews), extended stay (4.9/5, 7 reviews), and boutique hotels (4.6/5, 48 reviews). protel rates higher in luxury hotels (4.1/5, 37 reviews) and resorts (4.1/5, 20 reviews), but boutique hotels rate it lower (3.9/5, 51 reviews).

Both products have loyal user bases, but SkyTouch’s higher ease-of-use and support ratings correlate with stronger scores among budget and limited-service hotels. protel’s strength lies in larger, more complex properties with multi-property needs and currency requirements.

Edge: SkyTouch Technology.

How Much Do protel PMS (by Planet) and SkyTouch Technology Cost?

protel PMS has a base price of $500, and SkyTouch Technology’s base price is $600. Neither offers freemium, monthly flat, nor per-room pricing publicly, and both lack implementation fees or trial options.

This close base pricing means cost should not be the primary deciding factor. Instead, consider total cost of ownership including training, integrations, and potential customizations, where protel may incur higher costs due to complexity.

What Type of Hotel Should Use protel PMS (by Planet)?

• Hotels that require multi-currency and multi-lingual support for international guests.
• Teams needing comprehensive payment integration with native payment terminals and card readers.
• Properties seeking robust guest CRM, guest communication via SMS, and GDPR compliance.
• Hotels wanting extensive third-party integrations to connect revenue management, channel managers, and marketing tools.
• Operations that value on-premise deployment options alongside cloud capabilities.

Not ideal if:

• Your team needs a simple, fast-to-learn interface with minimal training.
• You have urgent support needs requiring quick phone access.
• You operate small properties without multi-property management demands.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SkyTouch Technology?

• Small to mid-sized hotels, motels, and limited-service properties prioritizing ease of use.
• Teams that onboard staff frequently and require intuitive interfaces with minimal training.
• Properties that benefit from cloud-native remote access for managers overseeing multiple locations.
• Hotels looking for straightforward rate management and distribution tools without complex configuration.
• Operations valuing responsive customer support with quick issue resolution.

Not ideal if:

• You need advanced multi-currency or GDPR compliance features.
• Your property requires extensive customization or integration beyond basic PMS functions.
• You manage complex group bookings or require sophisticated room assignment rules.

protel PMS (by Planet) vs SkyTouch Technology: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference between protel PMS and SkyTouch Technology is complexity versus simplicity. protel offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and multi-currency, on-premise options suited for hotels with advanced operational needs. SkyTouch delivers a user-friendly, cloud-based PMS with streamlined workflows and strong support, ideal for smaller, limited-service properties.

Choose protel PMS if you need robust payment integration, multi-language and multi-currency features, and a wide integration ecosystem to scale operations. Its 23 unique features like digital registration and shift planning provide operational depth for resorts and multi-property groups.

Choose SkyTouch Technology if your priority is ease of use, fast onboarding, and cloud accessibility. Its higher ease-of-use (4.7/5) and support ratings (4.5/5), combined with stable core PMS functionality and remote management capabilities, make it a practical choice for motels, limited-service hotels, and properties with straightforward needs.