The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 607 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) .
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Special offers & discounts and Pooled inventory.
Side-by-side ratings based on 607 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 512 |
After analyzing 607 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while SHR Group users highlight proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | #8 76 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | #2 369 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | #4 39 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #5 16 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | #3 232 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | #2 320 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | #2 166 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | #4 32 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | #8 39 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | #2 440 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | #15 11 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | #16 3 reviews |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and SHR Group’s SHR Booking Engine (BE) aim to convert website visitors into loyal guests, but they differ in market presence, features, and support. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific needs—so which platform better aligns with your goals?
Amadeus offers a more established global presence with a broader feature set, while SHR Group’s platform boasts higher recent review scores and more recent customer feedback. Which of these platforms will truly elevate your direct booking strategy?
Both platforms serve hotels seeking to boost direct bookings, but their core strengths diverge. Amadeus provides an integrated ecosystem, including its award-winning website and detailed market intelligence, making it ideal for properties looking for a comprehensive solution. SHR, by contrast, emphasizes simplicity and personalization, tailoring its offerings to smaller or independent hotels eager for an easy-to-use platform with strong support.
Amadeus's review count of 93, with all recent reviews being over six months old, indicates a stable but slightly outdated data set, whereas SHR boasts 339 reviews, all recent, making its ratings more reflective of current customer satisfaction. Are your priorities long-term stability or recent user experiences?
If your hotel operates in a competitive, global market with a need for integrated solutions—including website, market intelligence, and extensive PMS partnerships—Amadeus is the top pick. Its platform is well-suited for larger or branded hotels aiming to unify their digital presence and leverage advanced analytics.
If your hotel is smaller, independent, or prioritizes ease of use and rapid support, SHR Group offers a more straightforward, highly-rated solution. Its flexibility, proactive support, and focus on direct booking growth make it ideal for properties seeking quick wins and personalized service.
In summary, choose Amadeus for a feature-rich, globally proven platform; opt for SHR Group if you want a user-friendly, support-driven solution that already has high customer satisfaction.
Amadeus scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with many users citing its complex interface as a challenge initially but praising its depth once mastered. Its onboarding process is rated 4.01/5, indicating decent support during implementation, but some reviews mention a learning curve and occasional complexity.
SHR Group, on the other hand, achieves a 4.67/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward setup. Customers praise SHR for helping staff quickly adapt to the platform, boosting adoption and daily operations.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus offers 36 shared features, including advanced pricing, promotional tools, and market intelligence, but no exclusive features. Conversely, SHR Group provides 10 unique functionalities—such as special offers, social media integrations, gift vouchers, and room substitution—that enhance customization and guest engagement.
While Amadeus’s broad feature base supports large-scale operations with complex needs, SHR’s specialized tools cater to properties emphasizing personalized experiences and flexible promotions. Which set of features aligns better with your hotel’s growth strategy?
Edge: Amadeus.
Customer support ratings reveal a clear leader: SHR Group’s support scores 4.86/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, proactive communication, and helpful account managers. Examples include comments like “the team at SHR is fantastic and always helpful,” highlighting consistent support quality.
Amadeus, with a 3.22/5 rating, receives mixed reviews, with some users noting slow responses and difficulties resolving issues promptly. Though its extensive network can provide resources, support responsiveness appears inconsistent.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and digital marketing tools, with 39 shared integrations with SHR Group. Its extensive partner network, including industry giants like Cendyn and Stayntouch, supports complex operational needs.
SHR offers 81 verified integrations, including popular systems like Criton, OpenHotel, and HiJiffy, with many users citing seamless connectivity. However, Amadeus’s broader network may serve larger hotel chains better.
Edge: Amadeus.
Review data indicates SHR Group’s products have a higher overall rating (4.86/5) compared to Amadeus (4.39/5). SHR’s recent reviews emphasize excellent support and ease of use, especially among independent and boutique hotels.
Amadeus’s ratings are slightly lower, mainly due to support and complexity concerns, despite its extensive features. Larger properties and brands tend to rate Amadeus higher, but recent satisfaction leans toward SHR.
Edge: SHR Group.
Pricing for both platforms is not publicly disclosed, and neither offers a freemium or trial version. Implementation fees and monthly charges are reportedly available upon inquiry, requiring direct negotiation with vendors.
This lack of transparent pricing means your hotel will need to request quotes tailored to your size and needs, emphasizing the importance of assessing value beyond upfront costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers simple onboarding and support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a highly integrated, enterprise-level system with complex analytics or multiple global locations.
Amadeus’ iHotelier is a well-established, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integrations, suited for larger, global hotel brands that need a unified platform. Its strengths lie in advanced pricing, market intelligence, and a broad partner network, making it suitable for properties with complex needs and larger teams.
SHR Group’s Booking Engine, however, excels in customer support, ease of use, and recent positive reviews, particularly among independent and boutique hotels. Its tailored features for personalization and flexible promotions, combined with high satisfaction scores, make it an attractive choice for properties seeking quick implementation and strong support.
If your hotel values global connectivity and advanced analytics, Amadeus is the logical choice. But if user experience, support, and recent customer satisfaction are your priorities, SHR Group is the better option.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and SHR Booking Engine (BE) share 36 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Social Media Integration/Bookings | ||
| Special offers & discounts |
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and SHR Booking Engine (BE) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and SHR Group has 46. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor