The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 102 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
Hotelchamp shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Facebook conversion tracking and Customizable exit intent modals.
Side-by-side ratings based on 102 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 7 |
After analyzing 102 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while Hotelchamp users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | #32 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #12 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | #29 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | #23 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | #27 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | #23 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | #21 2 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, you’re balancing functionality, ease of use, integration capabilities, support, and cost. Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine offers a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive global reach, while Hotelchamp’s Booking Engine centers on intuitive design and conversion optimization. Your decision hinges on whether your priority is comprehensive features and extensive integrations or a streamlined, guest-friendly booking flow.
Both products aim to increase direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently. Amadeus’s tool emphasizes strategic revenue management and advanced functionalities, whereas Hotelchamp prioritizes a frictionless user experience. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions?
Amadeus iHotelier® is built around proven e-commerce practices, integrating seamlessly with Amadeus’s broader ecosystem, making it ideal for hotels seeking a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution. It is designed to increase revenue through advanced upselling, targeted promotions, and detailed analytics, attracting hotels aiming to maximize direct bookings and optimize revenue strategies. Its steep learning curve and complex interface can be barriers for smaller teams or less tech-savvy staff.
Hotelchamp’s Booking Engine, on the other hand, offers a simple, app-like booking flow designed to foster trust and reduce friction, which appeals to hotels focused on optimizing conversions through guest-centric design. With a five-star ease-of-use rating and quick onboarding, it’s suited for properties prioritizing a straightforward setup and a seamless guest journey. Is your hotel more interested in strategic revenue features or guest experience?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich platform with deep customization options, extensive integrations, and advanced marketing tools, go with Amadeus. Its superior review count (93 vs 3) and recent customer feedback highlight a more established presence, especially among independent and branded hotels seeking detailed analytics and automation.
If your team prioritizes ease of use, high guest satisfaction, and straightforward implementation, Hotelchamp is the better fit. Its average review rating of 5/5 and recent positive feedback underscore its appeal for hotels focused on conversion rate improvements with minimal complexity. For properties where simplicity and guest experience are primary, Hotelchamp outperforms.
Amadeus scores a 4.25/5 for ease of use, reflecting a platform that’s powerful but can require dedicated training and familiarization. Users mention that while the system offers great features, its complexity may initially challenge staff, and customer support experiences are mixed.
Hotelchamp, with a perfect 5/5 rating, is praised for its intuitive, clean interface and quick onboarding process. Reviews highlight its user-friendly design, making it easy for staff to adapt and for guests to navigate effortlessly. Edge: Hotelchamp.
Amadeus offers a broader set of features—30 in total—including pre-stay and post-stay emails, A/B testing, alternative accommodation recommendations, and multiple payment options like Paypal and PayU. Its advanced marketing and revenue tools are tailored for larger hotels or those with complex distribution needs.
Hotelchamp provides 24 features, focusing on guest engagement and conversion. It offers unique capabilities like Facebook conversion tracking, customizable exit intent modals, and a highly intuitive booking flow. Its emphasis is on seamless guest experience rather than extensive marketing automation. Edge: Amadeus, for feature breadth and depth.
Amadeus’s support scores 3.22/5, with many reviews citing slow response times and inconsistent service quality. Users appreciate some dedicated account management but often experience delays that can impact operational efficiency.
Hotelchamp’s support, rated 5/5, is consistently praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers describe their support team as proactive, quick to respond, and supportive during onboarding and ongoing use. Edge: Hotelchamp.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and revenue management systems, making it ideal for hotels needing extensive connectivity. Shared integrations with platforms like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Oracle Hospitality demonstrate its compatibility with diverse hotel tech stacks.
Hotelchamp, with 45 verified partners, offers a solid range of integrations but fewer than Amadeus. Its focus is more on marketing and website tools, such as Swayy and Customer Alliance, rather than broad distribution systems. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39/5 is driven by positive feedback from independent and branded hotels, especially in Europe and North America. Its recent reviews, though limited, reaffirm its strong reputation among larger, more established properties.
Hotelchamp’s 5/5 rating, based on very limited reviews, indicates high satisfaction among its small user base. Given the recent reviews, Hotelchamp’s user experience and support are highly appreciated, but its smaller sample size means less broad feedback. Edge: Amadeus.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models, but they are typically offered as subscription services with custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. No free tiers or trial options are indicated, so budget considerations should be discussed directly with sales.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited IT support, or prefers a straightforward, guest-centric booking experience.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive automation, detailed analytics, or complex integrations beyond marketing tools.
The core difference is that Amadeus offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform designed for large or complex hotels needing detailed revenue management, integrations, and automation. Hotelchamp, in contrast, provides an intuitive, conversion-focused solution ideal for properties emphasizing guest experience and ease of use.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel requires a broad suite of tools, extensive integrations, and sophisticated marketing automation to drive revenue. Opt for Hotelchamp if your priority is a straightforward, guest-centered booking flow with minimal setup and maximum ease of use.
For hotels that value a proven, well-rounded system with extensive support and features, Amadeus’s larger review base and recent positive feedback make it the stronger choice. If your hotel leans toward simplicity, high guest satisfaction, and quick deployment, Hotelchamp offers a compelling alternative.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Hotelchamp Booking Engine share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability) | ||
| Customizable exit intent modals | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Meal plans | ||
| PayU | ||
| Paypal | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Stripe |
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and Hotelchamp Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while Hotelchamp Booking Engine offers 45. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hotelchamp Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. Hotelchamp Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and Hotelchamp has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor