The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Pegipegi shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. and Pegipegi hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic goals. Both products aim to streamline booking processes, but their core functions and market presence differ significantly. ASI WebRes provides a comprehensive booking engine integrated into a broader property management system, while Pegipegi functions more as a travel platform aggregator. So, which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
If your goal is to enhance your direct booking capabilities with a feature-rich, well-supported system, ASI WebRes clearly stands out. Conversely, if your focus is on offering a user-friendly interface for travel bookings that integrates flights, trains, and accommodations, Pegipegi might seem appealing—but it currently lacks the depth and recent validation that ASI offers.
Both products address hotel booking needs, but their focus diverges. ASI WebRes is tailored for hotels seeking a powerful, integrated booking engine that connects with their property management system, offering real-time inventory management, multi-channel distribution, and extensive customization options. Pegipegi, on the other hand, functions more as a travel aggregator platform that simplifies the booking of flights, trains, and hotels, primarily serving larger travel agencies or online travel companies.
While ASI WebRes has garnered 20 recent reviews, reflecting ongoing customer satisfaction, Pegipegi has no reviews or recent feedback, raising questions about its current relevance in the hotel industry. Do you want a proven, review-backed solution or a platform with unverified recent performance?
Given the data, ASI WebRes’s recent reviews reinforce its reliability, making it the more trustworthy choice for hoteliers committed to operational efficiency and direct bookings. Are you prepared to adopt a platform with a proven track record and active customer support?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable booking engine integrated within a property management system, go with ASI WebRes. It’s suited for independent hotels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios that require real-time reservation management, automated housekeeping modules, multi-currency support, and extensive integrations with 19 verified partners.
If your hotel or travel business primarily seeks a multi-purpose travel platform for booking flights, trains, and hotels without the need for deep integration into property operations, Pegipegi could be considered; however, it lacks recent reviews and detailed feature documentation. For hoteliers aiming for growth and operational control, ASI WebRes’s proven features and regional presence make it the more compelling choice.
In essence, ASI WebRes offers a full-fledged, hotel-centric booking engine with ongoing support, whereas Pegipegi appears to serve a broader travel booking role without recent validation. Would you prefer a solution with a clear hotel focus and recent positive feedback?
ASI WebRes boasts an impressive ease of use rating of 4.95/5, underpinned by detailed onboarding processes, streamlined workflows, and support staff praised for their quick, courteous assistance. The system’s intuitive interface minimizes staff training time, as reflected by an onboarding score of 4.8/5 and consistently positive reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness.
Pegipegi, lacking any available ratings, reviews, or detailed user feedback, offers no data to suggest ease of use or onboarding experience. Its interface and implementation process remain unverified in the hotel context, which is a critical gap for hoteliers seeking reliable, quick adoption.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes features an extensive suite of 27 functionalities, including mobile responsiveness, special offers & discounts, integration with Tripadvisor and Google Hotel Ads, multi-room bookings, customizable rate plans, social media integration, and multi-currency support. It also offers detailed reporting, rate comparisons, and compliance standards like PCI and ADA.
Pegipegi provides a travel booking platform for flights, trains, and hotels but lacks publicly available details on specific features or customization options. Its platform seems geared more toward aggregating travel options rather than delivering hotel-specific functionalities.
Given the feature count and depth, ASI WebRes offers a richer, hotel-focused set of tools. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Customer support ratings favor ASI WebRes, with a 4.85/5 score based on reviews praising prompt, knowledgeable, and courteous service. Users highlight the system’s quick resolution of technical issues and seamless onboarding, which contributes to high retention and recommendation scores—99% are likely to recommend.
Pegipegi has no available reviews or support ratings, creating uncertainty around the quality and responsiveness of its customer service. For hotels prioritizing reliable support, this lack of data is a significant drawback.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes features 19 verified integrations, including industry-standard partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, Duetto, and social media platforms. These integrations facilitate real-time reservations, distribution, and analytics, supporting a connected hotel tech ecosystem.
Pegipegi, with no verified integration partners, offers no data on its ability to connect with other hotel systems or distribution channels. This limits its usefulness for hotels seeking streamlined operations and centralized data management.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes’s recent reviews, totaling 20 in the last six months, consistently praise its user-friendliness, support, and feature set. Its NPS score of 9.85/10 reflects strong customer satisfaction and willingness to recommend—99% of users say they would recommend it.
Pegipegi has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user ratings or satisfaction levels. Without concrete recent data, ASI WebRes remains the more trusted, highly-rated option for hoteliers.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Both products do not publicly disclose their pricing models, but ASI WebRes operates on a licensing basis without a freemium or trial, implying a custom quote based on property size and needs. Pegipegi’s pricing is also undisclosed, suggesting a tailored approach or a less hotel-specific model.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your hotel should directly contact vendors for quotes. However, the value for money scores and recent reviews for ASI WebRes indicate that it offers a high ROI, especially given its extensive features and support.
Not ideal if your hotel mainly needs a simple booking portal without complex management features. Also not suitable for properties with minimal online booking needs or those seeking a free, basic solution.
Not ideal if your hotel requires comprehensive management tools, detailed reporting, or integration with other property systems. Also not suitable if recent validation or customer support quality is critical.
In summary, ASI WebRes offers a complete hotel-focused booking engine with proven, recent reviews, extensive features, and dedicated support—making it the more dependable choice for hotels aiming for operational control and growth. Pegipegi, while a capable travel platform, lacks recent validation and detailed hotel-specific functionalities, limiting its appeal for property management.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, and well-supported booking engine, go with ASI WebRes. It’s backed by recent customer feedback, broad integrations, and a strong regional presence, ensuring your property can optimize bookings and guest experiences effectively.
Choose Pegipegi only if your focus is on broad travel aggregation with minimal hotel management requirements, and you’re comfortable with the absence of recent reviews or detailed feature comparisons. In the current market, ASI WebRes’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment for most hotels.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Pegipegi |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and Pegipegi share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Pegipegi |
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and Pegipegi share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while Pegipegi offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. Pegipegi: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and Pegipegi has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property