The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Athena shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Athena users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing between Athena by Athena and RMS by RMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in features, usability, and market presence. Athena, a newer entrant with zero reviews and a focus on AI-driven revenue management, contrasts sharply with RMS, a well-established, feature-rich platform with nearly 300 recent reviews. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s ambitions?
Athena promises an AI-powered approach to revenue management, emphasizing automation and data-driven decision-making. However, it lacks reviews, making its real-world performance and user satisfaction uncertain. RMS, with over 20 recent reviews and an overall 4.56/5 rating, demonstrates a proven track record of supporting diverse hotel types worldwide. RMS offers a broad suite of features, including integrated booking and payment solutions, which Athena currently does not.
The key divergence lies in market presence: RMS operates across 22 countries, serving a wide range of hotel segments, while Athena's regional reach remains unlisted. RMS’s extensive feature set and active user base suggest it’s more adaptable and reliable for hotels seeking a mature PMS. Are you prepared to rely on a system with no peer reviews, or do you prefer the confidence of RMS’s proven performance?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with robust integrations, RMS is the clear choice. It suits properties that require comprehensive management tools—like channel management, guest CRM, revenue tracking, and online support—and can benefit from its extensive partner network. RMS is ideal for hotels aiming to scale and optimize revenue with a system that’s been tested and refined over decades.
Conversely, if your hotel values AI-driven revenue insights and automation, Athena might appeal—though its lack of reviews and market presence make it a risky investment. Athena could serve tech-savvy hotels looking to leverage advanced algorithms, but without user feedback, it’s difficult to assess its reliability or ease of implementation. For most hotels, RMS’s proven track record and detailed feature set outweigh Athena's futuristic promise.
RMS’s user experience benefits from a well-established interface rated at 4.28/5, with support staff praised for helpfulness and quick responses. Customers appreciate its intuitive reservation management and real-time reporting. RMS also boasts a comprehensive onboarding process, averaging 4.12/5, with many users highlighting its simple setup and seamless integration.
Athena, however, scores 0/5 across usability ratings, with no recent reviews to gauge actual user experience. Its AI focus suggests a potentially complex system that may require significant training to adopt fully. Until Athena gains user feedback, RMS’s established, highly-rated usability gives it a decisive edge.
RMS’s feature count surpasses Athena’s by a wide margin—74 versus Athena’s zero—offering tools like integrated CRS, booking engine, revenue management, POS, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, and more. These features are crucial for properties that need to manage complex operations and multiple channels efficiently.
Athena’s feature set appears limited to AI-driven revenue management, with no specific PMS functionalities listed. Its focus is on automation and analytics, but without the extensive operational tools RMS provides, it’s less suitable for hotels requiring comprehensive management solutions. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support ratings at 4.48/5 reflect a strong commitment to customer service, with reviews citing quick, knowledgeable assistance. Support team members like Makiko and Tara are praised for their responsiveness, and the system offers online support resources that help users maximize features.
Athena’s support experience remains undocumented, with no reviews to establish a support rating. Given RMS’s proven support track record, it currently holds the advantage in customer service, especially for hotels that require reliable, ongoing assistance. Edge: RMS.
RMS clearly outperforms Athena in integrations, with over 112 verified partners and a wide array of tools including channel managers, payment processors, and guest communication platforms. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but RMS’s extensive partner network ensures compatibility with most third-party hotel solutions.
Athena has no listed verified integrations, limiting its immediate connectivity options. For hotels relying on a diverse suite of third-party tools, RMS’s open ecosystem offers a significant advantage. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s recent reviews reveal an average rating of 4.56/5, with property types from independent to branded hotels giving high marks. Hotels in the U.S., Europe, and Asia appreciate its scalability, features, and support, demonstrating broad satisfaction.
Athena lacks reviews entirely, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without a track record or recent feedback, RMS’s user ratings and positive reviews establish it as the safer, more trusted choice. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s pricing is listed at $800 per month, with no free tier or trial options. This flat monthly fee grants access to over 74 features, making it a substantial investment but one that’s backed by proven performance.
Athena’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent fee structure. Its unspecified costs and limited information make it harder to evaluate value. Based on available data, RMS’s clear pricing and feature set provide better transparency.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in maturity and proven performance—RMS offers a comprehensive, extensively tested platform with thousands of satisfied users. Athena’s AI focus is promising but unproven in real-world hotel operations, making RMS the safer choice for most properties.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting growth, RMS provides clear advantages in support, integrations, and user satisfaction. Its long-standing presence and extensive reviews make it the recommended choice for hotels seeking operational excellence now.
However, if your team is eager to explore AI-driven revenue management and is comfortable with a newer product, Athena might eventually fit your needs. For most hotels, RMS remains the more reliable, well-supported option.
According to HTR's product database, Athena and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Athena and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Athena offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Athena: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Athena has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor