The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 86 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Aven Hospitality shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (3.4/5) , with exclusive features like Post-stay emails and Confirmation emails.
Olive shines , with exclusive features like Booking abandonment recapture and Room substitutions.
Side-by-side ratings based on 86 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 86 | 0 |
After analyzing 86 verified reviews, Aven Hospitality users most value its integration and connectivity, booking engine, revenue optimization, while Olive users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Connectivity
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Optimization
▾
|
|
|
+
Account Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Stability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 10 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 34 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 10 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 42 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 53 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #15 10 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 48 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 15 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #12 5 reviews | — |
When choosing a booking engine, your goal is to find a platform that integrates well with your existing systems, offers a seamless guest experience, and supports your revenue goals. Both Aven Hospitality and Olive aim to deliver these results, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Aven Hospitality provides a well-established solution with a proven track record, while Olive offers a newer, AI-driven approach promising innovative guest engagement. Which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Aven Hospitality’s booking engine boasts a long-standing presence with 77 recent reviews and a solid 3.68/5 overall rating. It specializes in integration, flexibility, and extensive features, making it suitable for hotels that prioritize stability, connectivity, and detailed customization. Conversely, Olive’s platform has no reviews yet, reflecting its early stage and limited proven adoption, but it emphasizes AI-powered personalization and smart merchandising. Are you looking for a tested solution or an innovative one?
While Aven Hospitality’s reviews highlight ease of use, robust reporting, and a broad partner network, Olive’s focus on AI-driven guest experiences suggests a different value proposition. Your choice depends on whether you value proven reliability or cutting-edge guest engagement features. Do you want a platform with proven track record or one that’s still emerging?
If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integration, go with Aven Hospitality. Its broad partner network, including key players like Stayntouch and Oracle Hospitality, and more than 17 core features make it a versatile choice for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking stability and proven performance.
If your hotel is looking to leverage AI-driven personalization, guest engagement, and innovative merchandising, Olive could be appealing. However, with no reviews or established reputation yet, it’s better suited for tech-savvy properties willing to experiment with a newer platform. Are you ready to go with a proven player or an emerging innovator?
Aven Hospitality’s platform is rated 4.38/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, onboarding process, and staff adoption. Its review comments mention that “once familiar, it’s very effective,” but initial navigation can be challenging for new users. The onboarding process scores a 4.25/5, indicating a smooth start for most teams.
Olive’s interface and usability are unreviewed, but as a newer platform, it likely emphasizes simplicity and modern design. Given no user feedback, we can't definitively compare ease of use. However, with a substantial track record and high ratings, Edge: Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality offers 16 features unique to its platform, including multi-lingual support, GDPR compliance, Google Hotel Ads Bookings, TripAdvisor Bookings, and pre-stay, post-stay, and confirmation emails. Its features are designed to cater to diverse hotel operations, making it a comprehensive tool.
Olive has only five features, notably booking abandonment recapture, room substitutions, flexible dates, website integration, and loyalty program integration. While innovative, these features are fewer and less proven at scale.
Based on feature count and depth, the edge goes to Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality’s support has a moderate rating of 3.82/5, with reviewers mentioning that their support staff can be helpful but sometimes slow. Some highlight that “utilize your rep, they can escalate and get things done very fast,” indicating variability in support effectiveness.
Olive’s customer support is unreviewed, making it difficult to compare. Given Aven Hospitality’s established presence and review activity, Edge: Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality integrates with 80 verified partners, including major players like Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and many specialized solutions. This broad connectivity ensures your hotel can link with most systems and channels you rely on.
Olive has only 2 verified partners, including WebRezPro and ReservHOTEL, limiting its integration ecosystem. Shared partners include Stayntouch and Oracle Hospitality, but the scale favors Aven Hospitality.
Edge: Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality’s recent reviews and ratings show a 3.68/5 overall score, with 77 reviews and a likelihood to recommend of 83%. Hotels in various segments, from independent to branded, rate it favorably for its features and stability.
Olive has no reviews, so there’s no user feedback to consider. Given the data, the clear winner in hotel ratings is Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality charges a base price of $600 per month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fee. Pricing is transparent and based on a flat monthly fee, suitable for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Olive’s pricing is not publicly available, which may pose challenges for budgeting and comparison. Without clear pricing details, evaluating value is difficult.
Aven Hospitality offers a comprehensive, well-rated booking engine with proven integration, stability, and extensive features. Its established reputation makes it a safer choice for hotels needing reliability and broad connectivity.
Olive presents an innovative, AI-powered approach that’s promising but unproven at scale, with no reviews to date. It’s better suited for hotels ready to test new guest engagement methods and willing to accept the associated risks.
Choose Aven Hospitality if your hotel values stability, proven features, and broad integration. Opt for Olive if your hotel is a tech-savvy pioneer seeking to leverage AI and innovative merchandising, and you’re comfortable with an untested platform.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Aven Hospitality Booking Engine and Olive Booking Engine share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Flexible dates | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Loyalty program integration | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Paypal | ||
| Price comparison widget | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Website Integration |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend Sabre/Synxis for its seamless integration capabilities with other systems like PMS and RMS, and robust connectivity with mult... Users frequently commend Sabre/Synxis for its seamless integration capabilities with other systems like PMS and RMS, and robust connectivity with multiple OTA channels. This integration ensures accurate data flow, reducing manual work and preventing overbooking while enhancing distribution reach.
The booking engine offered by Sabre/Synxis is praised for its efficiency, ease of use, and ability to handle complex configurations. It's optimized fo... The booking engine offered by Sabre/Synxis is praised for its efficiency, ease of use, and ability to handle complex configurations. It's optimized for mobile and allows hoteliers to make real-time updates. However, some reviews mention room for improvement in customization options and quicker implementation of user-requested enhancements.
Sabre/Synxis provides tools for creating new rates and promotions which help in maximizing bookings across channels. The flexibility in creating prici... Sabre/Synxis provides tools for creating new rates and promotions which help in maximizing bookings across channels. The flexibility in creating pricing strategies and real-time updates on rates significantly contributes to revenue growth.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a common critical point. While some users appreciate the support staff's dedication and responsiveness, many reviews report delays... Customer support is a common critical point. While some users appreciate the support staff's dedication and responsiveness, many reviews report delays in issue resolution and a perceived lack of expertise among support agents, which can significantly impact operations.
Users appreciate the customization flexibility that Sabre/Synxis offers, from configuration of rate plans to booking engine design. However, they also... Users appreciate the customization flexibility that Sabre/Synxis offers, from configuration of rate plans to booking engine design. However, they also highlight that certain areas, such as report customization and adding new features, need improvement to meet specific hotel requirements.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Aven Hospitality Booking Engine and Olive Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Aven Hospitality Booking Engine offers 80 verified integration partners, while Olive Booking Engine offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Aven Hospitality Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Aven Hospitality Booking Engine: No. Olive Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Aven Hospitality has an HT Score of 73 and Olive has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor