The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Crtip shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 0 |
After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while Crtip users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Crtip |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Crtip |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Crtip |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Crtip |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
Choosing between SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and Crtip hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. SHR BE is a comprehensive, feature-rich booking platform designed explicitly for hotels, while Crtip is a travel itinerary management system with AI-driven content aggregation and personalized recommendations. While SHR BE is focused on increasing direct bookings and revenue management, Crtip aims to streamline travel planning and decision-making. Do you need a dedicated hotel booking engine or a versatile trip planning tool?
Both products aim to enhance your guests’ experience, but SHR BE offers more control over booking processes and revenue strategies. Crtip’s primary value lies in aggregating trip data and generating personalized suggestions, making it more suitable for travel agencies or corporate travel. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s core priorities of direct booking growth or travel optimization?
SHR Booking Engine is tailored specifically for hotels seeking to boost direct reservations and revenue. It integrates with your website, offering tools like targeted messaging, upselling, multi-lingual support, and rate management, making it ideal for hotel properties aiming to own their booking journey. Crtip, however, focuses on travel planning and itinerary optimization, with no dedicated hotel booking features, making it less relevant for property-level booking conversions.
If your hotel’s goal is to increase direct bookings, control pricing, and improve guest retention through a sophisticated booking platform, SHR BE is clearly the superior choice. Conversely, Crtip might serve your corporate or travel agency clients better if your focus is on providing tailored travel itineraries and trip summaries, but it does not directly support hotel bookings.
If your hotel needs a dedicated booking engine with robust features for direct reservations, go with SHR BE. It’s designed for hoteliers wanting to control the entire booking process, optimize revenue, and offer personalized experiences. With over 339 reviews and a 4.86/5 overall rating, SHR BE has demonstrated its reliability and usability for a wide range of hotel types, particularly luxury, boutique, and city center hotels.
If your hotel or hospitality business is more focused on travel planning, destination recommendations, and itinerary management—especially for corporate clients or travel agencies—Crtip may seem appealing. However, given Crtip’s lack of hotel-specific booking features and no available reviews, SHR BE remains the stronger, more proven choice for hotels wanting to grow direct bookings and improve operational control.
SHR Booking Engine boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.67/5, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Customers highlight the platform's user-friendly setup, easy rate management, and efficient booking management, though some mention backend navigation could be improved.
Crtip, on the other hand, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess usability. Its focus on itinerary management suggests a different, perhaps less complex, user experience suited for corporate travel planning rather than hotel staff managing a booking engine.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Booking Engine offers a comprehensive suite of 46 features, including mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, multiple rate types, loyalty integration, social media integration, and detailed reporting tools. It’s built specifically for hotels seeking control over their booking flow and revenue strategies.
Crtip’s features are centered around AI-driven travel summaries, personalized recommendations, and itinerary management, with no dedicated hotel booking features or integrations. Given its narrow scope, SHR BE clearly provides a more complete, hotel-focused feature set.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s customer support scores an impressive 4.86/5, with reviews highlighting the proactive, knowledgeable, and helpful support team. Customers frequently commend the onboarding process and ongoing assistance, describing it as responsive and integral to their success.
Crtip’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, reducing confidence in its customer service quality. For hotel operators, reliable support is crucial, especially during implementation and troubleshooting, making SHR Group the preferred choice.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Booking Engine integrates with 81 verified partners, including prominent PMS, channel managers, and digital marketing platforms, ensuring seamless connectivity across your hotel tech stack. Notably, it works with Criton, SHR Group, Priority Software, and others, supporting complex operational workflows.
Crtip has no listed integrations, limiting its utility for hotels that rely on a connected system environment. Its lack of integrations makes SHR BE the more adaptable, scalable solution for a hotel with existing technology infrastructure.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
With 339 reviews in the last six months and an overall rating of 4.86/5, SHR Booking Engine is highly rated across hotel segments, especially luxury, boutique, and city center hotels. Reviewers consistently praise its ability to maximize direct bookings, ease of use, and support quality, with an NPS score of 9.53/10.
Crtip lacks publicly available reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Considering recent, detailed feedback, SHR BE’s ratings reinforce its reputation as a reliable, hotel-centered booking engine.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Pricing details for SHR BE are not publicly disclosed, but it is a premium, enterprise-level solution with no freemium or trial options. Its value is reflected in its extensive feature set, integrations, and support.
Crtip also offers no public pricing or trial information, indicating a likely custom or enterprise quote process. Given the lack of transparent pricing and its niche AI travel features, SHR BE offers clearer value for hotels prioritizing direct booking growth.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, lightweight booking solution or operate on a very tight budget, as the platform’s complexity might require dedicated staff training.
Not ideal if your primary goal is to increase direct hotel bookings, or if you require extensive integrations and hotel-specific features.
SHR Booking Engine is a highly capable, hotel-focused booking platform designed specifically to boost direct reservations, improve revenue, and streamline operations. Its 46 features, deep integrations, and proven support make it the preferred choice for most hoteliers committed to owning their booking experience.
Crtip, while innovative as an AI travel planning tool, lacks hotel-specific booking functionality, integrations, and reviews. It’s better suited for travel agencies or corporate clients rather than hoteliers seeking to grow direct bookings.
Choose SHR Booking Engine if your hotel aims to control its reservations, maximize revenue, and provide a seamless booking experience. Opt for Crtip if your focus is on personalized travel recommendations and itinerary management for travelers outside of direct hotel booking processes.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Crtip share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Crtip |
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Crtip share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while Crtip offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. Crtip: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and Crtip has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor