The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 0 |
After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, you'll want a solution that not only increases direct bookings but also offers reliable support, robust features, and proven results. SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and Hotelerum’s (Dynamic Package Engine) both aim to boost your online revenue, yet they serve different needs. SHR BE has established a strong reputation with extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, whereas Hotelerum’s platform has limited publicly available review data. Which one aligns better with your goals?
Both SHR Booking Engine and Hotelerum are designed to increase direct bookings and streamline the reservation process. SHR BE emphasizes features like rate management, personalization, and marketing integrations, while Hotelerum focuses on dynamic packages and extensive channel management. SHR BE’s proven track record, with over 339 reviews, combined with recent positive reviews, makes it more reliable for hoteliers seeking comprehensive support and proven performance. In contrast, Hotelerum has no recent reviews, which limits confidence in ongoing user satisfaction.
Shr BE's 4.86/5 overall rating and a 96% likelihood to recommend reflect strong user confidence, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Hotelerum’s lack of review data makes it difficult to assess real-world performance, leaving hoteliers uncertain whether its features and support meet expectations. Given the available data, SHR BE clearly holds a competitive advantage for hoteliers prioritizing proven success and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a highly rated, feature-rich booking engine with extensive integration options and proven customer support, SHR BE is the clear choice. Its diverse feature set—including mobile optimization, A/B testing, special offers, loyalty integrations, and detailed analytics—caters well to hotels looking to optimize direct booking performance.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s focus is on creating dynamic packages, managing multiple online agencies, and reducing reliance on OTAs, Hotelerum’s platform might be more suitable. However, the absence of recent reviews and detailed customer feedback makes it hard to confirm it delivers consistent results. For most hoteliers aiming for reliability, growth, and support, SHR BE is the safer choice.
SHR Booking Engine boasts a user-friendly interface with a high ease-of-use rating of 4.67/5, supported by onboarding ratings of 4.63/5 and glowing reviews about its intuitive design. Customers praise SHR’s straightforward setup, helpful onboarding, and clean backend navigation, making staff adoption smooth even for smaller teams.
Hotelerum, with no publicly available user ratings or recent reviews, offers no clear insight into its usability or onboarding experience. Given the transparent, well-rated interface of SHR BE, the edge goes to SHR for ease of use and support.
SHR BE offers over 46 features not available in Hotelerum, including mobile responsiveness, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, pooled inventory, pre- and post-stay emails, multi-language/multi-currency support, loyalty integration, rate plan comparison, and more. These tools enable a hotel to customize and optimize the booking journey significantly.
Hotelerum’s platform mainly emphasizes creating dynamic packages and managing inventory across 200+ OTAs but lacks detailed feature disclosure. Without comparable feature data, SHR BE’s extensive capabilities and proven feature depth give it a decisive edge for properties seeking comprehensive control over their booking process.
SHR Group’s support and onboarding ratings are outstanding, each at 4.86/5, with numerous reviews praising their proactive, helpful, and knowledgeable customer service. Clients highlight the support team’s responsiveness and the positive impact on operational efficiency, especially during onboarding.
Hotelerum provides no recent customer support reviews or ratings, making it difficult to judge its support quality. Based on available data, SHR’s established reputation for excellent support strongly favors it for hoteliers who prioritize reliable, responsive assistance.
SHR boasts 81 verified integrations with popular PMS, channel managers, analytics tools, and payment providers, including Google Hotel Ads and TripAdvisor Bookings. Its extensive partner network ensures seamless connectivity with your existing systems.
Hotelerum's platform does not publicly list verified integrations, and the absence of recent reviews suggests limited or less transparent integration capabilities. For a hotel seeking broad, proven connectivity, SHR offers a clear advantage through its extensive partner ecosystem.
With 339 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.86/5, SHR Group’s booking engine enjoys high praise from a diverse range of hotel types, including boutique, city center, and luxury hotels. Its latest reviews emphasize improved conversion rates, excellent support, and ease of use across segments.
Hotelerum has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the depth and recency of SHR’s review data, SHR BE clearly leads in user ratings and hotel confidence.
Pricing details for SHR BE are not publicly disclosed but typically involve a monthly fee based on hotel size and feature requirements. Hotelerum similarly does not publish specific prices, which suggests a tailored quote based on your hotel’s needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best move is to contact each vendor directly. However, SHR’s proven value, with high satisfaction ratings, indicates a strong return on investment for most hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily depends on third-party channels without focusing on direct booking growth or prefers a simple, minimal system.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive reviews or robust support infrastructure.
The primary difference lies in proven performance and review backing: SHR Booking Engine is a well-established, highly-rated solution with a broad feature set and extensive integrations. It is suited for hotels wanting a comprehensive system that enhances direct bookings, supports marketing, and provides detailed analytics.
Hotelerum’s platform is tailored toward dynamic package creation and multi-channel inventory management but lacks recent user feedback to validate ongoing performance. For most hotels seeking a dependable, supported booking engine, SHR BE offers the safer, more proven option.
When to choose SHR BE: If your hotel needs a reliable, highly-rated platform with advanced features, extensive support, and proven results, SHR BE is your best choice. Its broad integration network and detailed analytics make it ideal for optimizing revenue and guest experience.
When to consider Hotelerum: If your hotel’s focus is on creating attractive packages and managing inventory across many OTAs with a flexible, adaptable platform, Hotelerum may be worth exploring — though the lack of recent reviews warrants caution.
Final recommendation: For most hotels actively seeking a trusted, feature-rich booking engine with verified customer satisfaction, SHR Booking Engine stands out as the clear leader.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine)
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and Hotelerum (Dynamic Package Engine) has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor