The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
Olive shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 0 |
After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while Olive users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
You’re weighing SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group against Olive’s booking engine. Both are designed to boost your direct bookings, but SHR BE offers a well-established platform with a broad feature set and extensive review backing. Olive’s AI-driven system emphasizes guest experience and personalization, promising a revolutionary approach but lacks the long-term validation of SHR BE. Which system truly fits your hotel’s needs?
SHR BE, launched in 1987, has accumulated over 339 reviews with a 4.86/5 overall rating, demonstrating consistent positive feedback and recent reviews. Olive, founded in 2021, has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making its overall effectiveness and hotel satisfaction unverified.
Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings and enhance guest experiences, but SHR BE’s established reputation, comprehensive features, and extensive integrations set it apart. Olive’s AI focus promises innovative guest engagement, yet without recent review data, its reliability remains unproven.
Are you willing to prioritize proven performance over untested innovation?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich booking engine that integrates with numerous partners and has a proven track record, SHR BE is your best option. It’s ideal for properties seeking reliable, customizable solutions with extensive support and proven ROI.
Conversely, if your team wants to experiment with AI-powered guest personalization and innovative guest communication to differentiate your property, Olive’s system may appeal. However, without verified customer feedback, its long-term value remains uncertain.
For hotels focused on dependable performance and scalable integration, SHR BE is the clear choice. If pioneering guest experience and AI are your priorities, consider Olive—but proceed cautiously.
SHR BE boasts a high ease of use rating at 4.67/5 and a solid onboarding score of 4.63/5, supported by over 339 detailed reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface and helpful support team. Users praise its straightforward setup and manageable backend navigation, though some mention room for UI improvements.
Olive, with no available review data, offers no insights into usability or onboarding experience. Given the established user feedback on SHR BE, it’s evident that your team will find it easier to adopt and operate SHR BE.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE offers 22 shared features plus 24 additional exclusive ones, including special offers, pooled inventory, multi-lingual support, and extensive payment integrations like PayPal and Stripe. These features enable detailed rate management, guest engagement, and marketing functionalities.
Olive, in contrast, provides no publicly listed features or unique capabilities, focusing on AI-driven personalization and embedded e-commerce. While innovative, its feature scope and depth are unverified against SHR BE’s comprehensive suite.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s support and onboarding ratings are outstanding at 4.86/5, with reviews praising proactive, knowledgeable, and quick assistance. Customers frequently highlight support as a core strength, with quotes like “the team at SHR is amazing to work with” and “support is always helpful and responsive.”
Olive provides no publicly available review data or support insights, limiting your ability to assess its customer service quality. Considering the proven support excellence of SHR BE, it offers a safer choice for hotel teams requiring reliable assistance.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE integrates with 81 verified partners, including major systems like Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and many others, offering broad connectivity across PMS, channel managers, and payment providers. This extensive integration network ensures your hotel can connect existing systems smoothly.
Olive has only 2 verified integrations, with shared partners such as Stayntouch and Oracle Hospitality. The limited partner ecosystem may restrict your ability to integrate with current hotel technologies.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE is rated 4.86/5 based on 339 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, feature set, and support. Properties across various segments, including boutique, city center, and resort hotels, consistently praise its impact on revenue and guest experience.
Olive has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or segment-specific feedback. Without verified ratings, SHR BE’s reputation remains the clearer and more trustworthy choice.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Both SHR BE and Olive do not publicly list their pricing models or costs. Typically, these platforms offer tailored quotes based on hotel size and needs, so your best move is to contact their sales teams directly for precise estimates.
Not ideal if your hotel is a very small property with minimal tech needs or if you prefer a solution with limited features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven, extensive integrations or reliable support, as Olive lacks verified review data and a broad feature set.
If you want a well-established, extensively supported booking engine with proven results, SHR BE is the smart choice. Its 339 reviews and high ratings demonstrate consistent performance across many hotel types, especially in competitive or complex markets.
If your hotel seeks to pioneer guest engagement through AI and innovative features, Olive’s system could be appealing. However, without customer reviews or a track record, this option carries more risk.
For reliability, proven ROI, and extensive integrations, SHR Booking Engine stands out. For experimentation and a focus on future guest experience, Olive may hold potential—but only if you’re prepared for unverified results.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Olive Booking Engine share 22 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts |
Showing top differences. 12 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Olive Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while Olive Booking Engine offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. Olive Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and Olive has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor