The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 512 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Boutique Hotels properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
rajakamar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 512 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 512 | 0 |
After analyzing 512 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its proactive customer support, integration capabilities, intuitive interface, while rajakamar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Proactive customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate and inventory management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Backend navigation improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Visual and aesthetic design
▾
|
|
|
−
Support documentation and training
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 76 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 369 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 39 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 320 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 166 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 440 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #15 11 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 3 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is vital for your hotel's profitability and guest experience. Both SHR Group’s SHR Booking Engine (BE) and rajakamar aim to streamline reservations and maximize direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive features and proven reliability or a straightforward, integrated property management system.
While SHR BE delivers a robust, feature-rich platform backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews, rajakamar offers an all-in-one property management system with no available recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs?
Both products serve as booking solutions, but SHR BE specializes exclusively in online reservations and revenue optimization, with 339 recent reviews and a 4.86/5 rating. In contrast, rajakamar is a broader property management system without recent reviews, making its suitability less clear.
SHR BE’s recent, detailed user feedback highlights its ease of use, customer support, and extensive feature set, whereas rajakamar’s lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to gauge current performance. This difference suggests SHR BE is more aligned with hotels seeking a dedicated booking engine. Are you looking for a proven platform with extensive capabilities, or a full PMS alternative?
If your hotel primarily needs a sophisticated, feature-rich booking engine to boost direct bookings and revenue, SHR BE is the clear choice. Its large review count and high rating reflect ongoing customer satisfaction, especially among boutique and city center hotels.
However, if your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system that integrates booking, guest management, and operations in one platform, rajakamar might seem appealing, but the absence of recent reviews makes it less reliable today. For most hoteliers seeking proven reliability and ongoing support, SHR BE offers the better fit.
SHR BE boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.67/5 based on 339 recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and onboarding process. Customers frequently mention how straightforward it is to manage bookings and rate plans, with some noting a slight learning curve in backend navigation.
In comparison, rajakamar’s usability cannot be assessed due to the absence of recent reviews or user feedback. Given SHR BE’s high satisfaction scores and active support, it clearly has the edge for hotels prioritizing an easy-to-navigate platform.
SHR BE offers an impressive 46 features, including mobile optimization, A/B testing, urgency messaging, special offers, loyalty integration, multiple payment options, and detailed reporting. These features allow hoteliers to customize guest experiences and optimize revenue effectively.
rajakamar, on the other hand, provides no publicly available feature list, which raises questions about its capabilities and depth. Without documented features comparable to SHR BE, the latter’s extensive toolset provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE’s support ratings are exceptional, with a 4.86/5 score based on 339 reviews. Customers frequently highlight proactive, responsive support teams and excellent onboarding, often describing their experience as “helpful,” “knowledgeable,” and “quick to respond.”
There are no recent reviews or feedback for rajakamar, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given SHR BE’s clear record of satisfaction, it takes the lead for hotels valuing dependable, ongoing assistance.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE integrates with 81 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and marketing platforms like Criton, Profitroom, and Google Hotel Ads. This extensive integration network ensures your hotel can connect smoothly with essential systems.
rajakamar offers no publicly listed integrations or partnerships, limiting its interoperability. For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of connected tools, SHR BE’s integrations are a definitive advantage.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE’s recent reviews, totaling 339, assign it a high overall rating of 4.86/5, with a net promoter score (NPS) of 9.53/10. Hoteliers across various segments, especially boutique and city hotels, praise its ease of use, features, and support.
In contrast, rajakamar has no recent reviews, so there’s no current data about user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of SHR BE’s reviews, it’s the more trusted and ratified choice among hoteliers today.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
Pricing details for SHR BE are not publicly available, but it is a premium product with no freemium or trial options, suggesting a customized quote based on your hotel size and needs. Its value is reflected in its feature set, support, and integrations.
rajakamar also does not publish pricing, which may indicate a bespoke quote or lack of transparency. For most hotels, the lack of transparent pricing makes comparison difficult.
Hotels that should consider SHR BE:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that might consider rajakamar:
Not ideal if:
SHR BE is a proven, feature-rich booking engine that powers direct bookings and revenue growth, supported by a large, satisfied user base. Its extensive integrations and high satisfaction ratings make it the preferred choice for hotels seeking a dedicated reservation platform.
rajakamar appears to be a broader property management system with limited publicly available information, lacking recent reviews and a proven track record. For most hotels aiming to optimize online booking and guest experience, SHR BE offers a more reliable, tested solution.
In summary, if your hotel values comprehensive features, active support, and a trusted track record, SHR Booking Engine is the clear leader. If you need an all-in-one property management system and are comfortable with limited recent data, rajakamar could be worth exploring, but it remains less certain in today’s market.
According to HTR's product database, SHR Booking Engine (BE) and rajakamar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgea... Users frequently commend SHR's proactive and responsive customer support. Account managers and support teams are described as very helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to respond to issues. The guidance provided by customer success teams is considered invaluable for optimizing use of the software. This topic is covered in 30 reviews.
A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs... A key feature frequently highlighted is the robust integration capabilities of the platform. Windsurfer CRS efficiently communicates with various PMSs, channel managers, and CRM tools, ensuring seamless operations and up-to-date information across systems. However, some users desire improved integration with additional systems and platforms. This topic is seen in 18 reviews.
Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The e... Users commend the intuitive interface of Windsurfer CRS, which makes the booking process seamless for guests and easy for hotel staff to manage. The ease of setting up and managing rate plans, the flexibility to customize booking pages, and straightforward navigation contribute to overall efficiency. This topic is identified in 20 reviews.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly... Some users have noted that while the frontend is user-friendly, the backend navigation and filtering options could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Improvements in these areas could significantly enhance efficiency and user satisfaction. This topic is identified in 12 reviews.
Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface... Some users suggest that the visual aesthetics of the booking engine could be improved. Enhancing the polished and modern design of the user interface could further elevate the overall booking experience and make it more visually appealing. This topic is discussed in 6 reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Booking Engine (BE) and rajakamar share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Booking Engine (BE) offers 81 verified integration partners, while rajakamar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Booking Engine (BE) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Booking Engine (BE): No. rajakamar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 46 and rajakamar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor