The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 126 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Sample PMS shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 126 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 126 | 0 |
After analyzing 126 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its ease of use and user interface, integration with pms and rms, distribution channel management, while Sample PMS users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and User Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with PMS and RMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Distribution Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Dynamic Pricing and Revenue Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support Availability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 51 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #10 65 reviews | #46 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #34 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #13 38 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 55 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #13 29 reviews | #50 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 7 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #22 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 123 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #24 1 reviews | — |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves balancing ease of use, features, support, and cost. Blastness AI Booking Engine by Blastness, with its extensive review history and recent user feedback, stands out as a proven solution. In contrast, Sample PMS's Codebranch Booking Engine Test has no reviews or recent data, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Do you want a platform trusted by many hotels with ongoing support, or is an untested solution appealing?
Blastness has accumulated 118 reviews over recent months, with 25 in the last six months alone, and boasts an impressive 87.88 score on the HotelTechReport (HTR) score. Its overall rating of 0/5 is a placeholder, but the high review count and recent activity make it the more reliable choice. Sample PMS, on the other hand, has no reviews or recent feedback, rendering an evaluation of its quality impossible.
Blastness’s reviews highlight its user-friendly interface, robust feature set, and seamless integration with PMS and RMS systems—key for hotels aiming to increase direct bookings. Conversely, Sample PMS offers no feedback, support ratings, or feature details, leaving hoteliers to wonder about its effectiveness or reliability. Essentially, Blastness’s proven track record makes it the clear choice for hotels seeking a trusted booking engine.
If your hotel needs a mature, well-rated booking platform proven to increase direct bookings and revenue, Blastness is the logical pick. Its combination of a high review count, recent positive feedback, and a broad feature set suits mid-sized and large hotels focused on online distribution and revenue management.
If, however, your hotel is exploring initial options and prefers a no-feedback platform for potential custom development or integration, Sample PMS might seem appealing. But without reviews, support details, or clear feature offerings, it’s a risky choice—especially when Blastness has consistently demonstrated value through user success stories.
Blastness scores 4.89 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Users note that the platform is reliable, straightforward, and designed to simplify daily operations, with some suggesting that navigation could be slightly faster. The onboarding process is rated 4.82 out of 5, reflecting overall satisfaction.
Sample PMS offers no data on user experience, onboarding, or UI ratings, making it impossible to compare usability directly. Given Blastness’s high scores and extensive positive feedback, it clearly has the advantage in ease of use.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers a comprehensive suite of 38 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, special offers, urgency messaging, booking abandonment recapture, multi-room booking, A/B testing, Google Hotel Ads integration, and GDPR compliance. These features enable dynamic pricing, targeted promotions, and multi-currency support, directly impacting conversions and revenue.
Sample PMS provides no publicly available feature list or unique capabilities, leaving uncertainties about its offering scope. Without concrete features to compare, Blastness’s extensive feature set makes it the more attractive choice for hotels seeking advanced tools.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness scores 4.89 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews applauding responsive, helpful service. Reviewers mention that support is generally prompt, though some wish for 24/7 availability and faster issue resolution—an area for ongoing improvement.
Sample PMS offers no information on support quality or customer service, making it impossible to assess. Given Blastness’s consistent positive feedback, it clearly leads in support quality.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness integrates with 15 verified partners, including Upsellguru, Oracle Hospitality, and hotelcube, covering a broad range of distribution, revenue, and property management tools. These integrations help streamline operations and increase distribution reach.
Sample PMS has no verified integrations listed, limiting its apparent connectivity options. For hotels seeking a platform that readily connects with existing systems and third-party tools, Blastness’s integrations are a clear advantage.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s recent reviews, totaling 25 in the last six months, highlight a 98% likelihood to recommend, with high scores across usability, support, and features. Hotels of various sizes and segments praise its impact on revenue and ease of operation.
Sample PMS has no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, preventing any comparable assessment. This makes Blastness the preferred option based on proven user satisfaction.
Edge: Blastness.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, indicating that costs are likely tailored or available upon inquiry. With Blastness, there’s no freemium or trial option, suggesting a paid, full-feature solution.
Sample PMS’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, which is typical for custom or enterprise solutions. Given Blastness’s established value and support, it’s a safer investment for hotels seeking predictable ROI.
Blastness’s AI Booking Engine is a proven, well-rated solution with a solid track record of enhancing direct bookings and revenue. Its extensive features, high user satisfaction, and broad integration options make it a safe, reliable choice for hotels aiming for growth.
Sample PMS’s Codebranch Booking Engine Test, lacking reviews, features, and recent data, is difficult to assess. Without evidence of performance or support, it’s not advisable to choose over a platform with proven results like Blastness.
If your hotel prioritizes trust, proven performance, and extensive capabilities, Blastness is the clear winner. For experimental or custom needs, Sample PMS may be worth exploring, but with significant reservations about support and reliability.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Blastness AI Booking Engine and Codebranch Booking Engine Test share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
While most reviews praise Blastness' user-friendly interface and clear navigation, a few users suggest further simplification. The system's intuitive... While most reviews praise Blastness' user-friendly interface and clear navigation, a few users suggest further simplification. The system's intuitive design is often highlighted as a strength, aiding in streamlined operations and enhancing user experiences.
Blastness is highly commended for its seamless integration with hotel management systems, significantly enhancing online distribution and overall reve... Blastness is highly commended for its seamless integration with hotel management systems, significantly enhancing online distribution and overall revenue. Users report increased direct bookings and improved data management, emphasizing the positive impact on daily operations.
Blastness effectively streamlines channel management, ensuring up-to-date availability and pricing across platforms. Users report optimized distributi... Blastness effectively streamlines channel management, ensuring up-to-date availability and pricing across platforms. Users report optimized distribution and increased visibility, contributing to a rise in direct bookings and revenue.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users appreciate the helpful and responsive support team, but there is a recurring request for 24/7 availability. The support's effectiveness in... Many users appreciate the helpful and responsive support team, but there is a recurring request for 24/7 availability. The support's effectiveness in emergencies is noted, although extended hours, especially weekends, are desired to address urgent issues more promptly.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Blastness AI Booking Engine and Codebranch Booking Engine Test share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness AI Booking Engine offers 15 verified integration partners, while Codebranch Booking Engine Test offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness AI Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness AI Booking Engine: No. Codebranch Booking Engine Test: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 88 and Sample PMS has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor