The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,255 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Brevistay-holida shines .
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,255 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 1,255 |
After analyzing 1,255 verified reviews, Brevistay-holida users most value its , while Cloudbeds users highlight ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Brevistay-holida |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Brevistay-holida |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 572 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 171 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 42 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #11 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Brevistay-holida |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 484 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 213 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #4 108 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 92 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Brevistay-holida |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 405 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 183 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #4 231 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #6 14 reviews |
Choosing a channel manager is critical for your hotel's distribution efficiency and guest experience. Both Brevistay by Brevistay-holida and Cloudbeds Channel Manager aim to streamline operations, but their offerings vary significantly. Brevistay appears to be a new or less-established product, with no reviews or ratings, while Cloudbeds boasts over 1,000 reviews, a high recent rating, and extensive features. Are you prepared to trust a platform with no user feedback versus one with proven, recent performance?
Brevistay-holida's lack of reviews and ratings suggests limited market presence or maturity, leaving your team without user-backed validation. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, scores nearly 100 on the HT R Score, with an overall rating of 4.64 out of 5 based on over 1,000 reviews, with 74 recent reviews, demonstrating active user engagement. Do you want a platform with proven reliability or one that’s still untested in real-world settings?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported channel management system that integrates with a broad ecosystem of hospitality tools, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for properties looking for advanced features like PMS connectivity, analytics, inventory management, and multi-channel support—features Brevistay currently lacks or doesn’t advertise. Conversely, if your hotel is a small operation with minimal distribution needs and is exploring new options, Brevistay might seem attractive, but its unverified status makes Cloudbeds the safer bet for growth and stability.
Cloudbeds' user-friendly interface scores 4.6 out of 5, with ease of onboarding and staff adoption rated highly at 4.45. Reviewers frequently praise its intuitive design, noting that staff can quickly learn and efficiently operate the system. Brevistay, with a score of 0 in ease of use and no reviews, provides no data to assess its usability. Given the importance of staff adoption, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 distinct features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-currency support, yield rules, and bulk updates—features critical for comprehensive channel management. Brevistay, with no features listed or reviewed, cannot compete on functionality. If your property requires robust, proven features, Cloudbeds’s extensive capabilities clearly surpass Brevistay. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support and onboarding ratings are both above 4 out of 5, with users citing responsive, helpful service and a smooth onboarding experience. Many reviews emphasize that Cloudbeds’ customer service is a key reason properties stay loyal, describing it as "miles ahead" of competitors. Brevistay offers no support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS, and other hospitality tech, offering extensive options. Brevistay, with no listed integrations or verified partners, leaves your hotel without proven connectivity options. The ability to connect with your existing tools and expand is crucial; therefore, Cloudbeds’s ecosystem offers a decisive advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ average review rating of 4.64 out of 5, based on over 1,000 reviews, indicates broad satisfaction. Hotels ranging from independent properties to small chains rate it highly, with recent reviews reinforcing its reliability. Brevistay’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess user sentiment. Given the data, Cloudbeds is the clear favorite for hotelier approval. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no additional charges for integrations or channels, offering transparency and predictability. Brevistay's pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be free, freemium, or unpriced—uncertain for a hotel seeking ROI. Without clear pricing, Cloudbeds’s value is easier to quantify. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds stands out as the proven, feature-packed, and well-supported platform, with a track record validated by over 1,000 recent reviews. Brevistay, lacking any reviews or feature data, remains untested, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, and fully featured channel manager supported by active user feedback, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its extensive integrations, strong support, and positive ratings make it the safer investment for your team’s growth and operational efficiency.
However, if your hotel is a small, experimental operation with minimal distribution needs, and you are willing to accept the risk of unproven software, Brevistay might be worth exploring—but only with caution.
In summary, for most hotels ready to grow and optimize distribution channels, Cloudbeds offers a proven, comprehensive, and highly-rated solution that can support your current needs and future expansion.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Brevistay-holida |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Brevistay and Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Brevistay-holida |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Brevistay and Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Brevistay offers 0 verified integration partners, while Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Brevistay: No. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Brevistay-holida has an HT Score of 0 and Cloudbeds has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor