The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 50 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChartBeds shines .
Faundit shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest requests and Mobile Access.
Side-by-side ratings based on 50 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 50 |
After analyzing 50 verified reviews, ChartBeds users most value its , while Faundit users highlight ease of use, guest experience, time-saving automation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| ChartBeds |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Time-Saving Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Courier and Shipping Preferences
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Inventory and Case Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile App Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost for Customers
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | ChartBeds |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #14 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #9 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | ChartBeds |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 22 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #10 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | ChartBeds |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #19 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 42 reviews |
Choosing a housekeeping management solution can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both ChartBeds and Faundit aim to streamline housekeeping, but they approach this goal quite differently. ChartBeds is a lesser-known system with no recent reviews or notable user feedback, while Faundit boasts a high review count, recent positive comments, and widespread adoption. Your decision hinges on which aspects matter most: comprehensive features, ease of use, or market presence.
Given the available data, Faundit's stronger reputation and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice. But understanding their differences more deeply can help you make a confident decision.
ChartBeds appears to be a property management system with an emphasis on guest reviews and operational insights, not specifically housekeeping. Its lack of recent reviews or a broad feature set suggests limited adoption and uncertain performance in housekeeping management. Faundit, on the other hand, is explicitly designed for Lost & Found processes, with a clear focus on automating and simplifying guest property recovery.
Faundit's 47 recent reviews—most rated 5/5—highlight its ease of use, automation, and support for operational workflows. ChartBeds, with zero reviews and no recent feedback, offers no current validation. Do you want a proven, user-rated solution? Faundit clearly stands out.
If your hotel needs a dedicated Lost & Found management platform that integrates with existing PMS systems, Faundit is the clear choice. It offers nine unique features, including request management, package tracking, automated notifications, and multi-language support, tailored for guest property recovery.
Conversely, if you're seeking a broader property management system with some housekeeping features but no specific focus on lost property or recent user validation, ChartBeds might seem like an option. However, the absence of recent reviews or verified integrations makes Faundit the safer, more tested option for hotels prioritizing Lost & Found and housekeeping automation.
Faundit earns a stellar 4.96/5 rating for ease of use, with 14 recent reviews praising its transparent, simple interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers highlight how staff find it intuitive and easy to adopt, often mentioning that it minimizes training time.
ChartBeds scores 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews or feedback, indicating either a lack of adoption or insufficient data. Without user reports, it's impossible to gauge its usability. Edge: Faundit.
Faundit offers nine features, including request management, lost & found, package tracking, automated notifications, guest requests, mobile access, multi-language UI, and shipping management. In contrast, ChartBeds provides no specific features related to housekeeping or lost property management, making it difficult to assess its capabilities.
Given Faundit's documented feature set designed explicitly for Lost & Found, it provides more comprehensive tools for housekeeping automation. Edge: Faundit.
Faundit is highly rated at 4.94/5 for customer support, with recent reviews commending its friendly, solution-driven team and quick support responses. Users appreciate the ongoing willingness to improve and adapt to local needs.
ChartBeds reports no reviews or ratings, leaving support quality unverified. Its lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its support capabilities. Edge: Faundit.
Faundit integrates with six verified partners, including hotelkit, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and others, facilitating seamless workflows across property management systems. ChartBeds, with zero verified integrations, offers no evidence of interoperability.
If integrations are vital to your operations, Faundit's partner network enhances its value. Edge: Faundit.
With 47 recent reviews, Faundit enjoys a 5/5 overall rating and a Net Promoter Score of 9.85/10, indicating strong user satisfaction. Hotel segments like luxury hotels and branded properties rate Faundit highly, often praising its efficiency and ease of use.
ChartBeds, with no recent reviews, cannot be rated. Its absence of feedback suggests it lacks proven customer satisfaction or current user trust. Edge: Faundit.
ChartBeds' pricing details are unavailable, indicating it may operate on a custom or undisclosed pricing model. Faundit charges a flat $100 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial, making it transparent and predictable.
If budget transparency is important, Faundit's clear pricing provides better value comparison. ChartBeds' costs are unknown, which can be a risk factor.
Given the lack of recent validation, ChartBeds is best for hotels willing to test an unproven solution.
Faundit's broad feature set and recent positive reviews make it suitable for hotels prioritizing property recovery and operational efficiency.
Faundit is a dedicated Lost & Found management platform with a proven track record, extensive recent reviews, and strong user satisfaction. Its automation, integration options, and customer support make it a compelling choice for hotels seeking to optimize guest property recovery workflows.
ChartBeds, lacking recent validation, offers no clear evidence of strength in housekeeping or guest service. It may serve as a basic property management system, but without proven support or features, it's a risky choice for hotels prioritizing housekeeping.
Choose Faundit if you need a reliable, feature-rich platform that improves operational flow and guest experience. Consider ChartBeds only if you're open to testing an unproven system with minimal current user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, ChartBeds and Faundit share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | ChartBeds |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Notifications | ||
| Guest requests | ||
| Hotel branded confirmations & recommendations | ||
| Lost & Found | ||
| Package Management & Tracking | ||
| Request Management |
What hoteliers love
Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamles... Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamlessly. The platform's ease of deployment and daily use is highly appreciated by hotel staff, streamlining their workflow significantly.
Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional inter... Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional interaction with the hotel staff. This capability helps in enhancing customer satisfaction.
The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual pos... The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual post office trips and easing tracking, Faundit frees up staff time for other tasks, contributing to cost efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include... The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include more flexible management tools like archiving completed cases.
There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing err... There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing errors on the spot.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChartBeds and Faundit share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ChartBeds offers 0 verified integration partners, while Faundit offers 6. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Faundit leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChartBeds: No. Faundit: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChartBeds has an HT Score of 0 and Faundit has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor