The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
HS/3 shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while HS/3 users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Deciding between Clock PMS and HS/3 (acq Mews) hinges on understanding your hotel's specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but Clock PMS’s extensive feature set and recent customer feedback make it a clear leader in this comparison. With a higher review count, more recent feedback, and a broader presence, Clock PMS offers a well-rounded choice for hoteliers seeking reliability and comprehensive functionality.
While HS/3 might appeal to smaller hotels or those looking for a straightforward, basic PMS, the lack of recent reviews and limited integrations puts it at a disadvantage. Your team should consider whether the depth of Clock PMS’s features outweighs the simplicity that HS/3 might offer.
Both Clock PMS and HS/3 serve the core purpose of managing reservations, check-ins, and guest communication, but they differ significantly in scope and maturity. Clock PMS, with a 4.8/5 overall rating based on 251 reviews—including six in the last six months—demonstrates consistent quality and ongoing customer satisfaction. Its features are broad, including booking engine, payment processing, channel management, revenue management, and guest messaging, which collectively support complex hotel operations.
HS/3’s zero-star ratings and absence of recent reviews indicate a lack of recent market engagement or user feedback, making it difficult to gauge its current performance. Its limited feature set and minimal market presence contrast sharply with Clock’s active, well-rated platform. If your hotel values a trusted, proven system, Clock PMS clearly outperforms HS/3. Are you willing to settle for a less tested solution?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting multifaceted operations, go with Clock PMS. It’s ideal for hotels that prioritize automation, integrations, and guest engagement, especially given its extensive partner network and high customer ratings. Smaller hotels or those with simpler needs might consider HS/3 if they prefer a basic system, but the lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice.
For hotels aiming for operational efficiency, revenue growth, and a seamless guest experience, Clock PMS provides a comprehensive solution supported by recent, positive feedback. Conversely, if your hotel is very small or just starting out without complex requirements, a simpler, less costly tool like HS/3 may suffice—but be aware of its limited market validation.
Clock PMS boasts a high ease of use rating at 4.78/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training requirements. Users frequently mention that new staff can learn the system rapidly, and the platform’s design simplifies daily operations. The onboarding process is rated 4.71/5, reflecting a smooth start for most hotels.
In contrast, HS/3 has no available review ratings or detailed user feedback, making it impossible to accurately assess its usability. Without recent feedback, it’s unclear whether HS/3 offers an intuitive experience or requires extensive training. Based on available data, Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS leads with 58 unique features, covering reservations, booking engine, channel management, revenue tracking, guest profiles, online check-in, digital registration, housekeepings modules, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and guest messaging, among others. These features allow hotels to manage almost every aspect of operations from a single platform.
HS/3 offers no detailed feature list or unique functionalities in the available data, suggesting it may lack the breadth of Clock PMS. With no verified integrations or advanced modules, HS/3 probably provides a more basic set of capabilities. Given the extensive features of Clock PMS and its dedicated modules, it’s the more capable choice for multi-layered hotel management. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is highly rated for support, with a 4.75/5 customer support rating and reviews praising its responsive, proactive service. Customers mention quick response times, helpful staff, and regular updates that improve the system. One review states, "Clock has proven itself as the native cloud-based, full-featured solution we’d been looking for."
HS/3 offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to assess its customer service quality. Its limited presence and feedback suggest that support might not be as responsive or well-established. Based on current data, Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts an impressive 111 verified integration partners, including popular tools like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, FLEXIPASS, Profitroom, and RevControl. These integrations enable seamless connections with booking channels, revenue tools, and other hotel management systems, providing flexibility and operational agility.
HS/3 has no verified integrations listed, and its limited market presence suggests fewer or no third-party connections. This significantly restricts its ability to adapt to your existing tech stack. For hotels relying on diverse tools and integrations, Clock PMS’s extensive partner network is a clear advantage. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s reviews reflect a strong user consensus, with a 4.8/5 overall rating based on 251 reviews, 6 of which are recent. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, with one client noting, “switching from Micros Opera, the workflows are much easier, freeing our staff from admin tasks.” Its core segments—independent, boutique, and city center hotels—rate it around 4.83-4.84/5.
HS/3’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the absence of recent feedback, it's unlikely to be rated higher by hoteliers. For proven performance and current customer approval, Clock PMS wins decisively.
Clock PMS is priced at $600 per month with no freemium or trial options noted. Its transparent pricing structure aligns with its comprehensive feature set and large market presence.
HS/3’s pricing details are unavailable, and no trial information exists. This opacity makes it difficult to compare value directly. Given the high rating and features of Clock PMS, its cost appears justified; HS/3 might be a cheaper but less proven alternative.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal automation needs, or if you prefer a low-cost, simple management system. Also, not ideal if you prefer a system with limited features or a smaller vendor footprint.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced automation, detailed reporting, or a broad partner network. Also, not ideal if you value proven, recent customer feedback.
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based property management system that excels in feature depth, user satisfaction, and integrations. It has a proven track record, active customer base, and recent positive reviews, making it a reliable choice for most mid-to-large hotels.
HS/3, despite its claims, has no recent reviews or verified integrations, suggesting limited market validation. Its simplicity may appeal to very small hotels or those seeking a basic system, but the lack of recent data makes it a risky choice.
Choose Clock PMS if you want a well-supported, feature-rich platform with a broad market presence and high user ratings. Opt for HS/3 only if your needs are minimal, and you accept the uncertainty around its current performance and support.
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and HS/3 (acq Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and HS/3 (acq Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while HS/3 (acq Mews) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. HS/3 (acq Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and HS/3 has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor