The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 335 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines when it comes to feature richness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Centralized Messaging.
Kwentra shines , with exclusive features like On premise.
Side-by-side ratings based on 335 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 7 |
After analyzing 335 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Kwentra users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | #68 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | #50 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | #29 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | #52 3 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | #49 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | #58 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | #66 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #9 6 reviews |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and kwentra by Kwentra hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and features differ significantly. Clock PMS offers a vast array of functionalities, supported by a large user base and recent reviews, while Kwentra, despite a smaller footprint, emphasizes legacy system integration and cloud efficiency. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s current and future demands?
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based property management system designed to handle reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk operations, housekeeping, guest messaging, and more, all within a single platform. Kwentra also provides an extensive ecosystem, blending legacy systems with cloud solutions to deliver reservation management, guest communication, housekeeping, and billing, but with fewer native features. The key divergence lies in Clock’s extensive feature set—offering 46 shared features plus 12 exclusive—that cater to hotels needing deep customization and extensive integrations.
Clock boasts a high user satisfaction rate, reflected in its 4.8/5 overall rating from 251 reviews, with recent, detailed feedback emphasizing ease of use, reliability, and support. Kwentra, with only 6 reviews, rates a perfect 5/5, but the limited number and recency of reviews mean less confidence in its current performance. Are you looking for a system with proven, large-scale adoption, or are you willing to explore a smaller, potentially more agile platform?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported system capable of managing complex operations across multiple regions, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive integrations, including 111 verified partners, and detailed functionalities like multi-currency, multi-lingual support, native guest apps, and shift planning make it ideal for larger or expanding hotels. Conversely, if your hotel operates primarily within a limited geographic area with simpler workflows, and legacy system integration is a priority, Kwentra’s ecosystem might suffice, especially given its cloud-native approach.
Hotels that require a scalable, customizable PMS with broad integration options and proven support should go with Clock. If your team values legacy system compatibility, a more straightforward SaaS experience, and fewer native features, Kwentra could meet your needs. However, considering the current review volume and recent positive feedback, Clock’s more established presence makes it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
Clock PMS receives a 4.78/5 rating for ease of use from 251 reviews, with many praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Users report that new staff can be trained efficiently, and the system tends to streamline daily tasks, reducing miscommunication and manual work. Reviewers appreciate the clear navigation, automated workflows, and the responsiveness of support when issues arise.
Kwentra, rated 4.83/5, benefits from its cloud-based architecture and legacy system integrations, making it somewhat familiar for users transitioning from traditional software. Despite fewer reviews, feedback indicates that Kwentra’s interface is straightforward, and its ecosystem simplifies data flow across departments. Given the larger user base and more recent feedback, Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS surpasses Kwentra in features, offering 46 shared functionalities plus 12 exclusive ones like guest profiles, multi-currency support, native guest app, messaging, shift planning, and PCI compliance. These features enable detailed customization, automation, and guest engagement. Kwentra, with only 18 verified integrations and a focus on legacy-system compatibility, offers core reservation, billing, and communication features but lacks many of Clock’s native add-ons.
If your hotel values a rich feature set that supports complex operations and guest personalization, Clock clearly leads. Kwentra’s strength lies in its ability to integrate with existing legacy systems, but it does not match Clock’s native feature depth. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS benefits from a support rating of 4.75/5 based on 251 reviews, with many hoteliers citing quick, helpful responses and proactive service. Review quotes highlight the responsiveness of the Clock team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, contributing to smoother operations.
Kwentra’s support is rated 4.83/5 from only 6 reviews, with users praising the helpfulness and quick responses of their team. However, the limited review data makes it hard to gauge consistency across all users. Given the larger, more recent review base and sustained high ratings, Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS offers 111 verified integrations, including YieldPlanet, SiteMinder, Adyen, and others, with 12 shared partners with Kwentra. These integrations cover channel managers, payment processors, revenue management, and more, providing extensive flexibility.
Kweta’s 18 verified partners include Expedia, Yanolja Cloud, and Nonius, but with fewer total integrations, limiting options for extensive third-party connections. If your hotel relies heavily on integrations for daily operations, Clock’s broader ecosystem makes it the clear leader. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s user reviews, from a sizable 251, are consistently high, with a 4.8/5 rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Reviewers from diverse hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and ongoing updates.
Kwentra, with only 6 reviews, maintains a perfect 5/5 rating, but the limited data diminishes confidence. Its users, primarily from resorts and smaller hotels, note satisfaction with system simplicity and support. Considering review recency and volume, Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, making budgeting straightforward. The pricing model is transparent and suited for hotels seeking a predictable expense.
Kwentra’s pricing is not publicly listed, which suggests possible customized quotes or tiered pricing based on your property’s size and needs. This lack of transparency might complicate budgeting but could offer tailored solutions. For most hotels, the clear pricing of Clock provides peace of mind.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, straightforward system with minimal features or operates predominantly in a single location with basic needs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive native functionalities, broad third-party integrations, or rapid expansion plans requiring comprehensive support.
Clock PMS offers a broad, well-rounded platform supported by a large customer base, extensive integrations, and regular updates. Its feature set caters to hotels needing detailed customization, automation, and multi-region management. If your hotel values proven reliability and a mature ecosystem, Clock is the clear choice.
Kwentra focuses on legacy system integration and cloud-based simplicity, ideal for smaller properties or hotels with existing infrastructure. Its limited reviews and fewer native features suggest it’s better suited for hotels looking for a lightweight, scalable solution with specific integration needs.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers evaluating current data, Clock PMS’s large review volume, recent positive feedback, and feature depth make it the recommended option. Kwentra might serve niche requirements but lacks the proven scale and comprehensive support that Clock provides.
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and kwentra share 46 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and kwentra share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while kwentra offers 18. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. kwentra: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Kwentra has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor