The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Smart Finder shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Smart Finder users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations and guest experience. Your options, Clock PMS by Clock and Soraso by Smart Finder, serve the same core purpose but differ vastly in maturity, features, and market presence. Clock PMS, with 251 reviews and recent positive feedback, offers a robust, full-featured platform. Meanwhile, Soraso has no reviews or user data yet, indicating it’s a less proven solution. Which will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Both Clock PMS and Soraso aim to streamline hotel operations, improve guest interactions, and boost revenue. Clock PMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based system with a strong track record, whereas Soraso remains largely untested in the market. Clock’s extensive features and proven customer satisfaction make it the safer choice; Soraso's lack of reviews raises questions about reliability and maturity. Are you comfortable betting on an unproven platform, or do you prefer a tested solution with a solid track record?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, integrated solution that combines reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, housekeeping, and guest messaging, Clock PMS is the clear winner. Its users praise its ease of use, operational efficiency, and extensive partner integrations, making it ideal for hotels seeking a one-stop platform. However, if your hotel is small, highly specific, or experimenting with new tech, Soraso might seem appealing, but without reviews or features listed, it’s a risky, unverified option.
For hoteliers prioritizing reliability, proven features, and support, Clock PMS stands out. Conversely, Soraso could be considered if your hotel can tolerate the unknown and prefers a potentially customizable, early-stage solution—though this is speculative. Given the available data, Clock is the definitive choice.
Clock PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5 based on 251 reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal training time. Reviewers say, “The use of Clock is easy and reliable,” and “Pretty simple new employee training.” In contrast, Soraso has no reviews or user feedback available, making it impossible to assess its usability.
Your team will benefit from Clock’s proven user friendliness and support during onboarding. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 58 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, revenue management, integrated CRS, guest profiles, payment processing, and automation tools—features that are essential for efficient hotel management. Soraso’s feature set remains undisclosed, with no details or comparisons provided, indicating a lack of publicly available features or proven capabilities.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive, feature-rich platform that covers every operational need, Clock PMS is clearly ahead. Without transparency or user reviews, Soraso cannot compete. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS enjoys a high support rating of 4.75/5 from 251 reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance. Comments include, “The staff have been very efficient,” and “Responsive and helpful customer service.” Soraso has no publicly available review data or support ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain.
Reliable support is critical for hotel operations—Clock’s proven, high-rated support makes it the safer bet. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS features 111 verified partner integrations, including major brands like IDeaS, and offers extensive third-party connection options. Soraso only lists two verified integrations, with Hoteliers.Guru as its sole partner, severely limiting its connectivity options and flexibility.
The broad integration ecosystem of Clock PMS allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with revenue, booking, and operational tools. Soraso’s limited integrations restrict its potential. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has a review score of 4.8/5 based on 251 reviews, with recent reviews indicating ongoing satisfaction. Hotel segments like independent properties and boutique hotels rate it highly, praising its usability and feature set. In contrast, Soraso has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction.
Relying on recent, detailed feedback, Clock PMS’s superior ratings demonstrate its established value. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS costs $600 per month with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing details for Soraso are unavailable, indicating it may not have transparent or established pricing models yet.
For your budgeting considerations, Clock provides a clear, predictable subscription fee, whereas Soraso's unknown costs add uncertainty. Edge: Clock PMS.
Not ideal if you’re a very small property with minimal operational needs or prefer a simple, single-feature solution.
Not ideal if you require a proven, comprehensive, and well-supported PMS. The lack of reviews and features makes Soraso a risky choice for most established hotels.
Clock PMS is a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, proven support, and high user satisfaction, making it ideal for hotels seeking a reliable, all-in-one solution. Its 251 recent reviews and 4.8/5 rating provide confidence that it can meet diverse operational needs effectively.
In contrast, Soraso remains an untested newcomer with no reviews, features, or proven track record. Unless your hotel is in a region where Soraso has local support and you are willing to take a chance, Clock PMS is the safer, smarter investment.
For most hotels looking to optimize operations today, Clock PMS’s proven performance and comprehensive capabilities make it the clear choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Soraso share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Soraso share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Soraso offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Soraso: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Smart Finder has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor