The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,255 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
FastBooking shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,255 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,255 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,255 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration, while FastBooking users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
FastBooking |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
FastBooking |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
FastBooking |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
FastBooking |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager (MyAllocator) and CRS FastBooking.com hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline reservations, increase occupancy, and reduce manual workload, but they serve different hotel profiles and integration approaches. Cloudbeds, with its extensive features and proven reliability, dominates the market and review scores, while FastBooking offers a centralized reservation platform that may suit certain operational models. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager is the clear leader, boasting over 1,000 reviews with a 4.64/5 rating and consistent recent feedback—making it the more reliable choice. FastBooking, with no reviews or ratings, cannot compete on data-backed trustworthiness or user satisfaction.
Cloudbeds provides a comprehensive platform combining PMS, channel management, and reporting, with a proven track record backed by over 1,000 reviews and a 4.64/5 rating. FastBooking, on the other hand, appears to solely focus on reservation centralization without available user reviews or detailed feature data, making Cloudbeds the more tested and trusted option. Do you need an all-in-one system that integrates multiple operations or a dedicated reservation system?
If your hotel needs a full operational suite—integrated PMS, channel management, analytics, and multi-currency support—then Cloudbeds is the clear winner, especially given its extensive partner network and proven scalability. Smaller hotels or properties prioritizing reservation centralization without broader management tools might consider FastBooking, but the lack of user feedback makes this less reliable for decision-making. For most hotels aiming for growth and efficiency, Cloudbeds offers more tangible value.
Cloudbeds’ platform has a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating from over 1,000 reviews, with users praising its intuitive dashboard, quick setup, and straightforward management of reservations and channels. In comparison, FastBooking’s interface and onboarding experience are unreviewed, leaving uncertainty around its usability. Given Cloudbeds’ well-documented ease and recent positive feedback, it clearly provides a smoother experience for your team. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-lingual support, 2-way real-time integrations, and yield rules—none of which are available in FastBooking. The depth and variety of Cloudbeds’ feature set support complex operations and multi-property growth. Without any specific features listed for FastBooking, Cloudbeds’s feature richness makes it the superior choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a customer support rating of 4.41/5 based on over 1,000 reviews, with users frequently highlighting responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive onboarding. Many reviewers describe Cloudbeds’ support as “miles ahead,” especially during implementation and troubleshooting. FastBooking’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, making Cloudbeds the more trusted option for reliable assistance. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, and technology providers, facilitating flexible connectivity. FastBooking has zero verified integrations, limiting adaptability and expansion potential. For a modern hotel needing seamless, extensive integrations, Cloudbeds’s ecosystem is a decisive advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s reviews show a 4.64/5 rating from over 1,000 hotels, with recent feedback emphasizing ease, reliability, and comprehensive features. FastBooking lacks any publicly available ratings or reviews, so direct comparison is impossible. With proven high satisfaction levels, Cloudbeds’s reputation is clear. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no implementation or hidden charges, offering transparent, predictable pricing. FastBooking’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to assess value or compare costs. For budget-conscious hotels seeking clarity, Cloudbeds’s straightforward model is advantageous. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with proven reliability and extensive features that support growth. Its over 1,000 recent reviews and high ratings position it as the most trusted choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and scalable distribution.
FastBooking appears to serve a narrower function—centralizing reservations—without available user feedback or a detailed feature list. Its lack of reviews and integrations makes it a risky choice for hotels aiming for stability and growth.
If you want an integrated system that reduces operational complexity and enhances your ability to scale, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Consider FastBooking only if your needs are very limited and you’re confident in its capabilities without external validation.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
FastBooking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and CRS FastBooking.com share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
FastBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and CRS FastBooking.com share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189 verified integration partners, while CRS FastBooking.com offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. CRS FastBooking.com: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 99 and FastBooking has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor