The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,255 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Levart shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,255 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,255 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,255 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration, while Levart users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Levart |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator and Levart’s Channel Control hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both address the challenge of distributing rooms across multiple OTAs, but Cloudbeds offers a more integrated, feature-rich experience with broad regional presence, while Levart excels in connectivity with over 100 interfaces and a straightforward approach.
Your decision should consider the scale of your property, the channels you prioritize, and your desire for an all-in-one platform versus specialized connectivity. Are you seeking a comprehensive management system, or is a focus on channel connections enough?
Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator is designed as part of a broader hospitality management ecosystem, offering features like centralized user management, inventory grid, integrated payment processing, and support for weekly and monthly rates. Its 190 verified integrations, including partners like Tripadvisor, Airbnb, and OTAs, make it highly adaptable for properties that want an all-in-one solution.
Levart’s Channel Control, by contrast, focuses solely on channel management, connecting your property to over 100 platforms for rate and availability synchronization. While Levart’s interface might be simpler, it lacks the extensive feature set of Cloudbeds and is best suited for hotels that need reliable OTA connectivity without additional management tools.
Given these differences, if your hotel wants an integrated platform that combines operations, reservations, and distribution, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If your main priority is expanding OTA reach with maximum channel availability, Levart’s extensive connectivity could suffice.
Edge: Cloudbeds
If your hotel needs a unified platform to streamline operations, manage reservations, and optimize distribution, Cloudbeds is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including centralized management, comprehensive reporting, and automation, appeals to hotels aiming for efficiency and growth, especially those managing multiple properties or diverse segments.
If your hotel’s primary goal is to maximize exposure across numerous OTAs, GDS, and metasearch engines with minimal management fuss, Levart’s connectivity excels. Its 100+ interfaces facilitate continuous updates and rate parity, ideal for properties that rely heavily on online channels but don’t require an integrated management solution.
For hotels seeking a full management toolkit, Cloudbeds provides more value. For those focused solely on channel connectivity, Levart’s specialized platform is sufficient.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ user interface receives a 4.6/5 rating, praised for its intuitive dashboard and straightforward onboarding process, making staff adoption easier. Users highlight its clean design and ease of training, which reduces operational disruptions during setup.
Levart’s interface is less documented in reviews but is described as a simple, dedicated channel management system. Given the lack of detailed user feedback and absence of recent reviews, it’s difficult to confirm how user-friendly Levart truly is.
Considering the detailed positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ ease of use is well-established. Levart’s simplicity may appeal for straightforward channel management, but it doesn’t match Cloudbeds’ comprehensive usability.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ platform includes 17 features, with key functionalities like centralized user & role management, inventory grid, integrated payments, and support for flexible rates. These features support a broad scope of hotel management needs, beyond just distribution.
Levart offers a single core feature: extensive OTA connectivity with over 100 interfaces. While this is a significant advantage for distribution, it lacks the additional management tools present in Cloudbeds.
For a hotel seeking an all-in-one management solution, Cloudbeds’ feature set far exceeds Levart’s. If your focus is only on connectivity, Levart’s specialization might suffice.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Customers frequently mention “excellent customer service,” with some stating, “I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It’s miles ahead.”
Levart’s support data is unavailable, and customer reviews are absent. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to judge Levart’s support quality, but the lack of public reviews suggests less proven support infrastructure.
Given Cloudbeds’ strong recent review count and high support rating, it clearly leads in customer service.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ 1062 reviews, with a recent 74 in the last six months, yield a 4.64/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflecting widespread satisfaction across diverse hotel types. Review highlights include ease of use, comprehensive features, and reliable support.
Levart’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its lack of recent or detailed feedback suggests it’s a less proven solution at scale.
For proven hotel management satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager is priced at $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, offering a straightforward monthly fee. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and integration capabilities.
Levart’s pricing details are unavailable, and it offers no trial or free tier, suggesting a potentially less flexible or transparent pricing model.
Given the transparency and clarity of Cloudbeds’ pricing, it provides better value for hotels seeking a predictable investment.
Edge: Cloudbeds
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds suits hotels looking for a comprehensive management system, especially those managing multiple assets or seeking AI-driven insights.
Not ideal if:
Levart is best for properties that need reliable OTA connectivity with minimal management complexity.
Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator is a full-featured, all-in-one solution designed to streamline hotel operations and expand distribution. Its broad integration ecosystem, recent positive reviews, and high user satisfaction make it well-suited for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Levart offers an extensive number of OTA interfaces, making it an excellent choice if channel connectivity is your primary concern. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature scope suggest it’s less suited for hotels wanting a comprehensive management system.
If your hotel values a proven, scalable platform with robust support, Cloudbeds is the definitive choice. If OTA reach alone is your priority, Levart provides reliable connectivity at a lower complexity level, but with less evidence of overall support and usability.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Levart Channel Control share 12 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Levart |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Levart Channel Control share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189 verified integration partners, while Levart Channel Control offers 13. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Levart Channel Control: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 99 and Levart has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor