The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,255 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Suissu shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,255 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,255 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,255 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration, while Suissu users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds' Channel Manager (MyAllocator) and Suissu's Channel Manager hinges on your hotel's specific needs in connectivity and features. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with a broad array of features, while Suissu focuses on seamless, real-time API integrations with a vast network of OTA channels. Which aligns better with your operational priorities?
Both solutions aim to streamline distribution, reduce manual work, and prevent overbookings. But Cloudbeds, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, appears more established and trusted. Are you ready to dive into the details?
Cloudbeds' Channel Manager is designed to serve a wide spectrum of property types, from independent boutique hotels to hostels, with a rich feature set that includes PMS connectivity, analytics, and multi-currency support. Suissu, by contrast, specializes solely in connectivity solutions, promising over 225 OTA integrations via a user-friendly API, but without its own property management or booking engine.
Cloudbeds has a 99.8+ HTR Score, over 1,000 reviews, and recent feedback from 74 reviews in the last six months, confirming its reliability and ongoing improvements. Suissu, however, has no publicly available review ratings or recent user feedback, making it difficult to gauge current customer satisfaction or support quality.
Cloudbeds’ reviews mention robust functionality, ease of use, and high customer satisfaction. Conversely, Suissu's lack of reviews suggests it may be less proven or less widely adopted, raising questions about its real-world performance. Should you prioritize a solution with proven user success?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel management, and booking engine capabilities, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (17 unique features) and widespread regional presence make it ideal for properties aiming for scalability and integrated operations.
If, however, your primary goal is to enhance distribution efficiency through a reliable, real-time API connection to a large network of OTA channels, Suissu might seem appealing. Yet, without reviews or proven support infrastructure, its suitability for critical hotel operations remains uncertain.
For most hoteliers seeking a trusted, feature-rich solution with recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds is the safer, more reliable pick. Do you want a proven platform backed by thousands of reviews and extensive regional support?
Cloudbeds' user interface scores 4.6/5, with onboarding rated at 4.45/5, and reviews frequently mention the platform's intuitive design and ease of staff training. Users appreciate its straightforward setup and centralized control, which reduces operational complexity.
Suissu, lacking publicly available user ratings or reviews, makes it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given its API-centric approach, it may require technical expertise to implement and manage, which could be a hurdle for smaller hotels without dedicated IT support.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, yield rules, and integrated payment processing. These features enable comprehensive management from reservations to revenue, all within one system.
Suissu provides a highly specialized connectivity platform, connecting PMS to over 225 channels through an API, but does not offer additional functionalities like analytics, booking engines, or inventory management.
With its broad feature set, Cloudbeds provides a more complete operational suite. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds' support is rated 4.41/5, with many reviews emphasizing their responsive, knowledgeable customer service. Users often comment that Cloudbeds' support team is proactive and helpful in resolving issues quickly, contributing to high satisfaction.
Suissu does not have publicly available support ratings or reviews, making it difficult to evaluate its responsiveness or quality of customer service. Given the importance of reliable support in critical hotel operations, this lack of transparency is a concern.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts over 190 verified integration partners, including major OTAs, payment processors, and property management solutions, offering a robust ecosystem. Its channel manager supports real-time updates, multi-currency support, and channel self-mapping.
Suissu provides connectivity to over 225 channels via its API, but lacks the verified partner ecosystem and user reviews that attest to stability and support quality. Its focus on API connectivity doesn't guarantee seamless, plug-and-play integrations without technical setup.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds' overall rating of 4.64/5 from over 1,000 reviews, with recent feedback from 74 reviews in the last six months, indicates strong, current user satisfaction. Independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels particularly rate it highly, often praising its ease of use and comprehensive features.
Suissu has no available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific ratings. Without recent reviews, its real-world effectiveness remains uncertain.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $200/month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing model is straightforward, with optional add-ons and a clear value proposition for small to large properties.
Suissu's pricing is not publicly disclosed, which can hinder your ability to evaluate its cost-effectiveness upfront. Many hotels favor transparent pricing to compare value directly.
Given the transparency and clarity, Cloudbeds offers a more predictable investment. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your hotel relies solely on very basic channel connectivity, or if you primarily need a simple, single-channel API integration.
Not ideal if you prefer an all-in-one system, or if you need integrated PMS, booking engine, or analytics in one platform.
Cloudbeds provides a broad, proven platform that combines PMS, channel management, revenue tools, and analytics, backed by thousands of reviews and recent positive feedback. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and high support ratings make it suitable for a wide range of properties seeking operational efficiency.
Suissu specializes in real-time API connectivity to OTA channels, promising high-volume distribution, but without its own PMS or booking engine. Its lack of reviews, recent feedback, and transparent support make it a less reliable choice for most hoteliers.
For properties seeking a trusted, all-in-one solution with recent high satisfaction scores, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. Choose Suissu only if your primary goal is OTA channel connectivity and you have the technical capacity to manage API integrations.
In summary, if you want a comprehensive, well-supported platform proven by thousands of reviews and recent user satisfaction, go with Cloudbeds. If your main focus is OTA distribution and you have the technical resources to handle API complexity, Suissu might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Channel Manager (by Su) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Channel Manager (by Su) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189 verified integration partners, while Channel Manager (by Su) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Channel Manager (by Su): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 99 and Suissu has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor