The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 256 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Szallas shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 256 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 256 | 0 |
After analyzing 256 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its support and on-boarding experience, ease of use and intuitive interface, comprehensive feature set, while Szallas users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Szallas |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and on-boarding experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive feature set
▾
|
|
|
+
Time-saving benefits
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile functionality
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical and display issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and subscription
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 66 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 21 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #13 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 38 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 42 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 24 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 25 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 21 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 194 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #25 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #20 2 reviews | — |
Choosing a channel manager is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue growth. Both eviivo Suite™ CM and Szallas aim to connect your property with OTAs and streamline booking management, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. With eviivo’s more established reputation and recent reviews, it provides a clearer picture of performance and support. Does your hotel need a proven, feature-rich platform, or is a simpler, less documented solution sufficient?
eviivo Suite™ CM has been on the market since 2004 and boasts over 231 recent reviews, with a high satisfaction rate of 97% likelihood to recommend. Szallas, in contrast, has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Both products aim to handle OTA connectivity, but eviivo’s extensive feature set and record of customer success suggest it’s more aligned with typical hotel needs.
eviivo’s platform is praised for its ease of use, support, and robust integrations, supported by a 4.65/5 ease-of-use rating and a 4.78/5 customer support score. Szallas, lacking review data, leaves hoteliers guessing about its usability, support quality, and reliability. Given that eviivo actively demonstrates its value through recent customer feedback, it’s evident that it is better suited for hotels seeking dependable, proven channel management.
Do you need a solution with a track record of customer satisfaction and ongoing support? Or are you comfortable exploring an unreviewed platform with limited publicly available data? The choice hinges on your desire for proven performance versus unverified options.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, reliable channel management system that integrates with multiple OTAs, manages rates, restrictions, and offers detailed analytics, go with eviivo. Its feature set of 15 unique capabilities—such as PMS connectivity, inventory management, and multi-currency support—makes it suitable for properties of all sizes, especially those with complex operations or a multi-property portfolio.
If your hotel requires only basic OTA connectivity without the need for advanced features or extensive support, Szallas might appear appealing. However, with no customer reviews or verified integrations, it’s risky to rely on Szallas for critical booking operations. eviivo’s proven track record and rich feature set make it the safer, more scalable choice for most hotels aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Are you looking for a mature platform with proven integrations and support? Or a minimal solution that might lack the robustness needed for scaling? Your decision should be based on your hotel’s complexity and growth ambitions.
eviivo Suite™ CM earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.65/5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, simplified management, and helpful onboarding. Customers frequently mention how the platform reduces manual work and streamlines daily operations, even for non-tech-savvy users. Support is rated at 4.78/5, with reviewers praising fast, friendly assistance and clear guidance.
Szallas offers no publicly available reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Without this data, hotel managers risk adopting an untested platform that could complicate daily operations or require extensive training.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo provides 15 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, bulk updates, real-time two-way integrations, channel self-mapping, rate support, inventory management, integrated payments, multi-lingual options, and analytics dashboards. These features facilitate comprehensive control and operational insights, especially for larger or multi-property hotels.
Szallas, lacking detailed feature information, appears to offer basic OTA connectivity without advanced tools or integrations. Its minimal feature set makes it less suitable for hotels seeking detailed rate management, automation, or multi-channel control.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s customer support has a near-perfect rating of 4.78/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and personalized approach. Support agents like Mohamed receive specific commendation for their clarity and commitment. Onboarding is similarly rated highly at 4.65/5, with many users citing a smooth transition and ongoing assistance.
Szallas offers no available support or support ratings, leaving uncertainty about its support quality or responsiveness. Hotels investing in support value reliable assistance, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s recent reviews reflect a strong hotelier rating, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a review count of 231, including 25 in the last six months. Hotels across different segments—such as vacation rentals, B&Bs, and boutique hotels—appreciate its ease of use, support, and functionality.
Szallas has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. This lack of feedback suggests that eviivo has a more engaged user base and a proven track record.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo charges a straightforward base price of $700 per month with no implementation fees, freemium options, or per-room charges. The platform’s pricing reflects its comprehensive features and proven support, making it suitable for hotels ready to invest in reliable channel management.
Szallas’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there is no information on its billing structure or value. The absence of transparent pricing and reviews makes it difficult to evaluate its affordability or ROI.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo Suite™ CM is a mature, feature-rich platform backed by extensive positive reviews, proven support, and a broad market presence. Its ability to connect multiple OTAs, manage complex rates, and provide detailed analytics makes it suitable for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking growth and operational clarity.
Szallas, lacking recent reviews and detailed features, appears to be a minimal solution with uncertain performance. While it might fit very simple needs or testing phases, the absence of verifiable data makes eviivo the more reliable choice for most hotels.
If your property requires a trusted, well-supported platform with a proven track record, eviivo is the clear winner. Conversely, if you only need very basic OTA connectivity and want to experiment without a substantial investment, Szallas could be considered—but with caution. Ultimately, for hotels aiming for stability, growth, and operational control, eviivo’s offering is far more compelling.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ CM and Szallas share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transiti... Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transition and setup process. The support team is noted for its quick, clear assistance, essential for smooth operations.
Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy use... Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy users. The ease of navigation across reservations, channels, and settings has significantly reduced administrative tasks.
The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that t... The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that these features save time and optimize daily management, although some call for more customization options.
Where hoteliers push back
While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, lead... While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, leading to challenges in managing bookings on the go.
Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technica... Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technical improvements could benefit the overall platform.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ CM and Szallas share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ CM offers 32 verified integration partners, while Szallas offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ CM leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ CM: No. Szallas: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 85 and Szallas has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor