The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
feratel media technologies AG shines .
Neobookings shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 38 |
After analyzing 38 verified reviews, feratel media technologies AG users most value its , while Neobookings users highlight support and professionalism, continuous improvement, booking engine. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and Professionalism
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Usability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #24 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #16 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #26 14 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #30 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #32 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #18 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 14 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #35 0 reviews |
Choosing between the Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) by feratel media technologies AG and Neobookings hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational priorities, and strategic goals. Both products aim to facilitate direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in features, usability, and market presence. Feratel’s solution is tailored for hotels integrated into a Destination Management System, while Neobookings offers a versatile all-in-one platform with extensive features and a broader hotel user base.
Given the current review landscape, Neobookings is clearly the more established and widely-adopted platform, with 37 recent reviews and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Feratel, on the other hand, has no reviews in the last six months and a 0% recommendation rate, indicating a lack of recent customer feedback and potentially less relevance in today’s market. Which platform truly aligns with your hotel’s growth strategy?
Neobookings stands out due to its more recent reviews, higher overall user satisfaction, and significantly higher NPS score of 9.84. Its ease of use, customer support, and value for money are rated near perfect, whereas Feratel’s ratings are nonexistent or at zero, making it difficult to assess its current performance. If recent customer feedback and proven success are your priorities, Neobookings is the clear choice.
However, Feratel’s product may still appeal if your hotel operates within a Destination Management System environment and primarily serves European markets. Yet, with no recent reviews, it’s hard to gauge its current reliability or support quality. Will your hotel prioritize proven user satisfaction or an unverified solution?
Feratel’s booking engine is designed mainly for hotels that are part of a Destination Management System like Deskline 3.0, offering features like automatic price calculations, multi-language support, and package offerings. Its core strength lies in its integration within a broader tourism ecosystem, especially in European markets, but it lacks recent user reviews to validate current performance.
Neobookings, in contrast, is an all-in-one platform supporting direct bookings, channel management, payments, and digital marketing. It boasts 26 unique features, including multi-currency, A/B testing, loyalty programs, and advanced analytics, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive digital sales solution. The decision hinges on whether your hotel needs a specialized DMS integration or a flexible, feature-rich platform.
Are you looking for a system with proven recent customer success? Or do you prefer a system tailored for specific tourism ecosystems with integration needs?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, all-in-one platform capable of boosting direct bookings through digital marketing, Neobookings is your best bet. Its strong recent reviews, high satisfaction levels, and extensive features make it ideal for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and revenue growth.
If, however, your hotel operates within a Destination Management System framework in Europe and requires a booking widget tightly integrated with a broader tourism ecosystem, Feratel’s solution might be more aligned—though the lack of recent reviews makes this choice riskier.
For hotels prioritizing modern digital campaigns, automation, and customer insights, Neobookings’s flexible tools and proven track record clearly set it apart.
Neobookings earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.85/5, backed by recent reviews that highlight its intuitive CMS, simple website management, and straightforward booking process. Users consistently praise its user-friendly interface and effective onboarding, with many saying it has significantly increased direct bookings.
Feratel, on the other hand, has no recent usability reviews, leaving its current user experience unverified. Its interface may be more suited to hotels already familiar with its ecosystem, but without recent feedback, it’s impossible to compare current usability standards.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers 26 features, including multi-room bookings, A/B testing, conversion reports, loyalty program integration, Google and Tripadvisor bookings, and PCI compliance—features that Feratel does not provide. These tools support advanced digital marketing, analytics, and customer engagement strategies.
Feratel’s platform, with only 10 shared features and no exclusive features listed, appears limited in scope. Its core offering is a straightforward booking widget without the extensive customization or marketing tools found in Neobookings.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’s support receives a perfect 5/5 rating, with recent reviews emphasizing its professionalism, responsiveness, and personalized assistance. Customers note that support is always available and that the team is proactive in implementing improvements.
Feratel’s customer support ratings are unavailable or unverified, making it difficult to assess its responsiveness or quality. Given the importance of support in platform success, Neobookings’s proven high ratings strongly favor it.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings integrates with 20 verified partners, including prominent channel managers like SiteMinder, Stripe, Oracle Hospitality, and others, providing broad connectivity for hotel operations.
Feratel offers 13 verified integrations, mostly with European-oriented systems like RoomRaccoon and Profitroom, but lacks the breadth of Neobookings’ partner ecosystem. If extensive integration options are critical, Neobookings leads.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings has 37 recent reviews, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a high review score reflecting overall satisfaction. Hotels across different segments, including luxury and boutique hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Feratel has no recent reviews, so current hotel ratings and satisfaction levels are unavailable. This absence of recent feedback suggests that Neobookings is the more trusted and proven choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Neobookings.
Feratel’s booking engine is priced at a flat $100/month, with no free tier or trial available, which may be attractive for small hotels but limits evaluation. Neobookings charges $500/month, offering a more comprehensive suite of features, with no trial or implementation fee listed.
While Feratel appears cheaper, the value depends on whether the limited features meet your needs. Neobookings’ higher price reflects its extensive capabilities and support, potentially offering better ROI for hotels seeking growth.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced digital marketing, analytics, or multi-currency support. Larger or international hotels should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely within a Destination Management System in Europe and prefers a tightly integrated ecosystem. Smaller hotels with minimal digital marketing needs might find the platform more complex.
Neobookings is a versatile, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, especially in recent customer feedback. Its broad integration options, high user satisfaction, and supportive service make it suitable for hotels looking to grow their direct bookings and streamline operations.
Feratel offers a specialized booking widget tailored for European hotels within DMS ecosystems, but the lack of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain. It’s better suited for hotels already embedded in Feratel’s ecosystem and operating in Europe, with less emphasis on digital marketing or analytics.
Hotels focused on modern digital growth, reliable support, and extensive features should choose Neobookings. Conversely, European hotels within a Destination Management System framework with minimal digital marketing needs might consider Feratel, but caution is advised due to limited recent feedback.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) and Neobookings share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Customizable exit intent modals | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Form autofill | ||
| Multi-room bookings |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
What hoteliers love
Users repeatedly commend the professional and dedicated support team at Neobookings, noting their availability, responsiveness, and ability to address... Users repeatedly commend the professional and dedicated support team at Neobookings, noting their availability, responsiveness, and ability to address issues promptly. This aspect significantly enhances the user experience and trust in the product.
Continuous improvement is highlighted as a key strength. Neobookings' frequent updates and commitment to evolving their products ensure the solution r... Continuous improvement is highlighted as a key strength. Neobookings' frequent updates and commitment to evolving their products ensure the solution remains competitive and effective for hotel operations.
Users emphasize the powerful, versatile, and intuitive nature of Neobookings' booking engine. It helps increase direct bookings and facilitates straig... Users emphasize the powerful, versatile, and intuitive nature of Neobookings' booking engine. It helps increase direct bookings and facilitates straightforward management, with mentions of significant sales boosts and positive user experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users point out usability issues within the CMS and other features, suggesting that enhancements in user interface and additional functionalities... Some users point out usability issues within the CMS and other features, suggesting that enhancements in user interface and additional functionalities, like a comprehensive loyalty program and easier automation, would be beneficial.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) and Neobookings share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Feratel Booking Engine (IBE) offers 13 verified integration partners, while Neobookings offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Neobookings leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Feratel Booking Engine (IBE): No. Neobookings: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. feratel media technologies AG has an HT Score of 0 and Neobookings has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor