The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 22 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Gourmet Marketing shines in Onboarding — especially for extended-stay properties (5.0/5).
Porter stands out with exclusive features like Mobile Optimized/Responsive.
Side-by-side ratings based on 22 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 12 | 10 |
After analyzing 22 verified reviews, Gourmet Marketing users most value its easy integrations, user friendly navigation, platform layout, while Porter users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Easy integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
User friendly navigation
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform layout
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Default date behavior
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Website Design vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #25 2 reviews | #16 4 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #19 5 reviews | #20 5 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #10 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #15 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #19 6 reviews | #21 5 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #17 5 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #25 1 reviews | #21 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 7 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #9 9 reviews | #24 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #9 9 reviews |
Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites and Porter - Premium Hotel Websites serve hotels aiming to enhance direct bookings through optimized, attractive websites, but they diverge sharply in customization and feature scope. Gourmet Marketing focuses on bespoke, data-driven design paired with digital marketing expertise, delivering tailored solutions for hotels wanting deep strategic partnership. Porter offers a template-based system rich in built-in hotel marketing features like multi-lingual support and conversion widgets, suited for properties seeking a comprehensive, ready-to-go platform.
Both platforms address the same business problem: driving more direct bookings and reducing OTA dependency by providing websites optimized for conversion and user experience. However, Gourmet Marketing’s approach leverages extensive marketing strategy and custom design, while Porter’s strength lies in its broad feature set and ease of content management for ongoing website updates.
If you manage a boutique or extended stay property requiring a fully custom website aligned with a long-term digital marketing partner, Gourmet Marketing is the better choice based on its perfect 5/5 overall rating from 12 reviews, including 2 recent ones, and a 100% recommendation rate. Its users highlight strategic insight and direct bookings growth, reflecting deep industry expertise.
Conversely, if your hotel is a resort, city center, or limited service property needing a feature-rich, mobile-optimized platform with multi-lingual capabilities and SEO tools built in, Porter fits better. Its 4.7/5 rating across 10 reviews, though lacking recent reviews, still shows solid satisfaction. Porter’s 15 unique hotel-specific features and integrations support ongoing site management without heavy customization.
The data for luxury hotels is mixed: Gourmet Marketing scores 5/5 (7 reviews) versus Porter’s 4.5/5 (3 reviews), favoring Gourmet Marketing. For extended stay hotels, Gourmet Marketing dominates with a 5/5 rating across 7 reviews compared to Porter’s 4.5/5 from a single review, indicating limited Porter presence there.
Gourmet Marketing leads ease of use with a 5/5 rating and perfect onboarding score, compared to Porter’s 4.9/5 ease of use and 4.7/5 onboarding rating. Reviewers applaud Gourmet Marketing’s intuitive layout and user-friendly navigation, which reduce staff training time and simplify digital marketing workflows. Porter users appreciate the ease of updating content and tracking website statistics but note occasional template limitations.
Reviewers also emphasize Gourmet Marketing’s smooth integrations that minimize setup friction and support faster adoption by hotel teams. Porter’s platform is described as easy to use but sometimes constrained by its templated design approach.
Edge: Gourmet Marketing.
Porter offers 15 hotel-centric features that Gourmet Marketing lacks, including multi-lingual support, SSL security, social media integrations, conversion widgets, customizable maps, and SEO plugins. These features collectively support marketing teams and front desks by improving guest engagement, enhancing website security, and increasing direct booking conversions through embedded tools like popups and review widgets.
Gourmet Marketing does not list unique features in the source but emphasizes custom design and digital marketing strategy integration. This means operationally, Porter enables hotel teams to manage content, promotions, and guest engagement directly through the platform, while Gourmet Marketing provides bespoke websites that require less reliance on built-in tools but more on agency-driven marketing.
Edge: Porter.
Both products have excellent customer support ratings, but Gourmet Marketing edges Porter slightly with a combined perfect 5/5 customer support and onboarding score, compared to Porter’s 5/5 support but lower 4.7/5 onboarding. Gourmet Marketing reviewers consistently praise their team's knowledge, responsiveness, and proactive marketing collaboration across multiple years.
Porter reviewers also describe a professional, flexible team that supports customization requests and provides friendly service. However, Porter’s onboarding can feel less tailored due to its template-based system, as some users wish for more custom design options.
Edge: Gourmet Marketing.
Porter integrates with 7 verified partners, including RoomRaccoon, SiteMinder, Mews, and Bookboost, while Gourmet Marketing connects with 5, including Lighthouse, The Hotels Network, and Triptease. Both share Revinate as a common integration, important for guest reputation management.
Porter’s integrations skew toward property management systems and booking engines, supporting real-time inventory and reservation data flow, which benefits hotels needing seamless booking connectivity. Gourmet Marketing’s partners emphasize marketing and conversion optimization tools, aiding marketing teams in revenue growth and guest acquisition.
With Porter having 40% more verified integrations, particularly in PMS and channel management, hotels prioritizing operational connectivity will find Porter advantageous.
Edge: Porter.
Gourmet Marketing has a higher overall rating (5/5) based on 12 reviews, including 2 recent ones, and a 100% likelihood to recommend. Porter holds a 4.7/5 rating from 10 reviews but lacks recent reviews, which limits confidence in its current product state.
Segment ratings favor Gourmet Marketing in extended stay (5/5 vs 4.5/5) and boutique hotels (5/5 vs 4.7/5). Porter is rated lower in luxury (4.5/5 vs 5/5) and vacation rentals (4/0/5 vs 5/5) but holds its own in resorts (4.5/5 vs 5/5) with fewer reviews on both sides.
Recent activity favors Gourmet Marketing slightly, with 2 reviews in the last six months versus none for Porter, suggesting its ratings better reflect the current user experience.
Edge: Gourmet Marketing.
Neither Gourmet Marketing nor Porter publishes pricing or offers trials. Both operate without freemium or monthly flat fees disclosed, and no per-room pricing is available. This implies pricing is custom-quoted, likely reflecting project scope for Gourmet Marketing’s bespoke services and Porter’s tailored template implementations.
Hotels must engage each vendor directly for cost estimates, considering factors like design complexity, features needed, and support services.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between Gourmet Marketing and Porter lies in customization versus feature breadth. Gourmet Marketing delivers fully custom websites paired with a data-driven marketing agency that drives direct bookings through strategic insight. Porter offers a feature-rich, templated website platform with built-in tools for conversion optimization and content management.
Choose Gourmet Marketing if your hotel values a strategic marketing partner who can tailor design and digital campaigns to your brand, evidenced by its perfect 5/5 rating and top scores for ease of use and support. Its clientele includes a strong presence in extended stay and boutique segments, where bespoke marketing impacts revenue significantly.
Opt for Porter if your hotel prioritizes an all-in-one website solution with multi-lingual support, SEO plugins, and multiple PMS integrations to streamline operations. Porter’s 15 unique features and integrations with leading hotel systems support operational teams managing mid-sized resorts and city center properties requiring flexible, feature-rich websites.
Where Gourmet Marketing excels in strategic partnership and custom design, Porter shines in operational functionality and built-in marketing tools. The decision hinges on whether your hotel’s priority is tailored marketing expertise or ready-to-use website features.
Website Design pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Design & Content Management
|
|
|
| Drag and Drop Page Builder | ||
| Hotel Website Templates | ||
| Whitelabel Capability | ||
| Fully Customizable Themes | ||
| Blog Post Composer | ||
| Customizable Attractions Maps | ||
| Website Personalization | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| Google AMP Markup | ||
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality | ||
| Mobile Optimized/Responsive | ||
| Review Widgets | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Popups & Alerts | ||
| Customizable Attractions Maps | ||
| Website Personalization | ||
|
▾
Internationalization
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
|
▾
Analytics
|
|
|
| Google Analytics Connection | ||
|
▾
SEO & Traffic
|
|
|
| Social Media Integrations | ||
| Google AMP Markup | ||
| Mobile Optimized/Responsive | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| SEO Plugins | ||
| Customizable Attractions Maps | ||
|
▾
Security & Compliance
|
|
|
| Security Protocals (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| ADA Compliant | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| Storefront/Voucher Functionality | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Conversion Widgets |
What hoteliers love
Users say HubSpot connects easily with other tools, reducing setup friction and helping teams keep workflows and data connected. For hotels, that can... Users say HubSpot connects easily with other tools, reducing setup friction and helping teams keep workflows and data connected. For hotels, that can mean less manual work and a smoother path to managing leads and campaigns in one place.
The review highlights HubSpot as user friendly, with a layout that is easy to work in and visually well organized. In a hotel context, that kind of si... The review highlights HubSpot as user friendly, with a layout that is easy to work in and visually well organized. In a hotel context, that kind of simplicity can help staff adopt the system faster and spend less time navigating the software.
The reviewer specifically likes HubSpot’s layout, implying the structure of the platform makes common tasks easier to follow. A cleaner layout can imp... The reviewer specifically likes HubSpot’s layout, implying the structure of the platform makes common tasks easier to follow. A cleaner layout can improve staff efficiency and reduce training time for hotel teams that need to move quickly.
Where hoteliers push back
A complaint is raised about the date field defaulting to the last day of the month instead of the current date. That small but important workflow issu... A complaint is raised about the date field defaulting to the last day of the month instead of the current date. That small but important workflow issue can create extra clicks and risk data-entry errors for hotel sales teams.
Ranks higher for
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites and Porter - Premium Hotel Websites share many core Website Design features, but each has unique capabilities. Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites offers 5 verified integration partners, while Porter - Premium Hotel Websites offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites: No. Porter - Premium Hotel Websites: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Website Design vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Gourmet Marketing has an HT Score of 0 and Porter has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property