The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
IBS Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel involves evaluating how well each solution addresses your operational needs, guest engagement, and future growth. ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. and iStay Booking Engine by IBS Software both aim to streamline reservation management but diverge significantly in their features and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns better with your hotel’s size, tech maturity, and strategic goals.
ASI WebRes is the more established solution, with a solid track record and a substantial number of recent reviews. In contrast, iStay, while offering a unified platform, has little publicly available feedback and fewer integrations. Would you prioritize proven support and features or a less-tested but potentially more expansive platform?
ASI WebRes and iStay both target hotels seeking to manage reservations and improve distribution. However, ASI WebRes is mainly designed for independent hotels, motels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios, offering a mature, feature-rich system that integrates reservations, channel management, and guest communications. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, support, and continuous updates, making it a dependable choice.
iStay claims to cover the entire guest journey, with a focus on simplifying property management for hotels, resorts, and gaming providers. Yet, it has zero recent reviews, which raises questions about its current user satisfaction and real-world performance. Given the more extensive user feedback for ASI, which platform offers the reliability your team needs now?
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly booking engine with a broad feature set and strong support, go with ASI WebRes. It’s ideal for properties that value seamless reservation, distribution, and communication management, especially if you want a system with recent, positive reviews.
If your hotel is looking for an all-in-one platform that claims to simplify the entire customer journey and has more advanced distribution capabilities, consider iStay. However, be aware that its lack of current reviews and limited integration data make it a riskier choice—best suited for hotels comfortable with untested platforms.
ASI WebRes boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.95 out of 5, supported by recent reviews praising its straightforward workflow, clear reports, and quick onboarding process. Hotel staff find it intuitive, especially with features like calendar views and customizable room settings, making daily management less burdensome.
Conversely, iStay’s usability has no publicly available feedback, which makes it difficult to evaluate its user interface or onboarding experience. Given the strong, recent reviews of ASI’s ease of use, edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers 27 distinct features, including multi-lingual support, Google Hotel Ads, social media integration, special offers, rate plan comparisons, and custom add-ons. Its features support flexible pricing, multi-currency transactions, and detailed reporting—capabilities that many hotels consider essential.
iStay, while claiming to cover the entire guest journey, provides no detailed feature list or unique functionalities publicly. With no verified features or recent reviews, it’s impossible to determine if it matches ASI’s extensive capabilities. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Recent reviews for ASI WebRes give it a support rating of 4.85 out of 5, with users citing fast, professional, and courteous help. Support staff resolve issues promptly, and onboarding is smooth, even for larger teams, making it a trusted partner for daily operations.
iStay’s customer support and onboarding details are not publicly available, and there are no recent reviews to assess service quality. Given the transparent, positive feedback for ASI, edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue systems, and marketing tools like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and TripAdvisor. This broad integration ecosystem allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with most third-party systems.
iStay has only 2 verified partners, with limited information on its available integrations. Without a sizable partner network, iStay may limit your ability to connect with other key systems. Edge: ASI WebRes.
While ASI WebRes has a review score of 4.8/5 based on 20 recent reviews, feedback emphasizes its ease of use, support, and ROI. Hotels of varying sizes appreciate its reliability and feature set.
iStay has no current reviews, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback suggests less proven performance. For now, the clear choice is: edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly listed, indicating they likely require custom quotes based on your property size and needs. ASI WebRes’s pricing model appears to be aligned with its comprehensive feature set and support, but exact costs are unavailable.
iStay also does not provide transparent pricing, typical for enterprise software, making direct comparison difficult. Consult directly with vendors for quotes tailored to your property.
ASI WebRes serves as a comprehensive, reliable booking engine that’s suited for properties of all sizes seeking proven performance. Its extensive features, recent reviews, and support network make it a safer, more predictable choice.
iStay offers an ambitious, unified platform promising to simplify operations and boost revenue, but its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations make it a riskier investment for properties that need immediate, proven results.
If your hotel values support, reliability, and a feature-rich environment, choose ASI WebRes. If you’re comfortable experimenting with a newer, potentially more expansive system and can manage the risk, consider iStay—but proceed cautiously and request demos or references first.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software) offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and IBS Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor